So when is this "Honest" discussion regarding race relations goint to occur?

Ooh that's so nice. What did you guys do? :D

&Went on a date :rolleyes: He paid of course and took me home, but he tried it. I just wasn't in the mood lol.

Nothing just spent quality time. Next time a guy pays, you should give him some. He spent his hard earned money, the least you could do is help him bust a nut.
 
Nothing just spent quality time. Next time a guy pays, you should give him some. He spent his hard earned money, the least you could do is help him bust a nut.

He'll bust a nut regardless. And I just didn't feel like fucking him, I wanted to be home anyway, so he's lucky I even let him drag me out.

Anyway, were all your kids together, or you went one house at a time?
 
He'll bust a nut regardless. And I just didn't feel like fucking him, I wanted to be home anyway, so he's lucky I even let him drag me out.

Anyway, were all your kids together, or you went one house at a time?

Nah I only saw the 2 by my first bm. My other son went away for thanksgiving, haven't came back yet.
 
I'll take your word for it. But like I said it makes sense. It's basically how we ended up with sanctuary cities in California. The cops couldn't be effective when people refused to talk to them out of fear of being deported or getting someone they loved deported.

Well as has been mentioned there are a LOT of reasons why we glorify the bad guys and vilify the cops. I think it's real easy for whites to kind of ignore, not be aware of, forget the sixties. I might not have been there but my father did march with Martin and Malcolm and did have hoses turned on him. I don't know if he was ever personally there for dogs (I assume not since that sounds like the kind of thing he would have brought up) and did rally with Huey. I was raised by him and spent time around my uncles who had similar experiences. I do my best to be aware of when my father's morality is starting to creep up but we are to some extent who our parents raise us as.

Unfortunately some of this is just shit we have to cry about and let it play out for another generation.



Oops.

That is kinda what I think it will take. Next generation will be talking about trayvon and brown. But that doesn't have the traction of the hard core discrimination and violence against blacks for basically no reason but skin color like the sixties.

One of the guys staying here is 1/2 German 1/2 Mexican. He says society just needs to fuck each-other to the same shade.
 
That is kinda what I think it will take. Next generation will be talking about trayvon and brown. But that doesn't have the traction of the hard core discrimination and violence against blacks for basically no reason but skin color like the sixties.

One of the guys staying here is 1/2 German 1/2 Mexican. He says society just needs to fuck each-other to the same shade.

Do you mean this will be a brown country?
 
That is kinda what I think it will take. Next generation will be talking about trayvon and brown. But that doesn't have the traction of the hard core discrimination and violence against blacks for basically no reason but skin color like the sixties.

One of the guys staying here is 1/2 German 1/2 Mexican. He says society just needs to fuck each-other to the same shade.

I doubt the next generation will be talking about Trayvon and brown, at least I sincerly hope that these things have largely stopped by then. Like I keep saying a lot of this has to do with perception. I'm sure there are times when I've been pulled over by a cop or had them question me when I fully deserved it or at least enough that it wasn't because I was black. I also know that there have been times when I've been waiting for a ride and the cops have been like "Why you out?" And literally every question they asked me needed to be backed up by one of the white people around me.

We're a long, long way from fucking to the same shade.
 
Do you mean this will be a brown country?

Its headed that way in any case. Whites are having fewer kids and later in life, hispanics are growing through birth-rate and migration. It's fine. Less skin cancer.
 
Its headed that way in any case. Whites are having fewer kids and later in life, hispanics are growing through birth-rate and migration. It's fine. Less skin cancer.

I doubt hispanics will continue growing through birthrate in a decade or two and contrary to popular belief there are quite a few fairly light skinned hispanics.
 
Spain absorbed all of its blacks and browns, America will do the same. By 2100 black skin will be uncommon.
 
Jesus

You lie as adroitly and as glibly as Throb...

You never do. You're of that class of poster who doesn't offer anything positive to a conversation, you just want to find fault with those who actually do.

One person who has tried to dominate this thread, is actually an old poster from the past trying to catfish us with a new persona and has no intention of holding a conversation either and that is, to a large extent why we can have no honest conversation, here, or anywhere else. If you're not about the full-on Liberal talking point meme, then...

:eek:

You're not smart enough to talk, you're guided by hate, you're nothing but a liar.

Now, if you have some evidence that you want to produce, or something that moves the conversation along, please do so. I have at least tried to do that.

Can you man up?

So AJ, why do you believe that black men commit more violent crimes as stated by the OP?

First let me point out that your question is of poor construction. I went the FBI site and looked at some breakdowns and in total number of crimes, it goes back and forth as to who commits the most which gives you an argument against what you think the OP said. However, went you compare numbers as a ratio, crimes over population, the black demographic wins hands down. Now I saw on page one or two the claim that FBI statistics never ever mention race and that was then assumed to be an a prori statement, but it I found it, then it cannot be a true statement or a valid premise for any logical construction, therefore, YOU need to make your case, not I.

Now, a partial answer to the question as I interpreted it, not raw numbers, which are not altogether truthful, but as a ratio which tells a grim and disturbing story.

Because as I have expounded upon many times, white Liberals simply refuse to let them grow up and encourage and foster their anti-social behavior in the guise of tolerance, diversity and understanding and then the offer them the hope of one-size fits all plans to improve their lot, that are variations on Bastiat's Broken Window fallacy that leads them, for appearance sake, to taking one step forward while ignoring the eventual two steps taken backwards once they move on to the next patronizing plan.

~~~~~

But, as I pointed out, you are not engaging in conversation, but the same behavior. You're not offering any thought or idea, what you are doing is eliciting a response in order that you may begin your next attack.

To me, it indicates one of two things: a mind closed or a mind unsure and insecure.

Both states have the same cause - the underdeveloped liberal ideology of moral relativism and the shaky and contradictory compartmentalization of which it is comprised.

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=773814

First let me point out that your post contains several misspelled words. Most programs offer spell check. You should ask one of the adults to help you with that.

Second let me point out that your post is long winded and neither addresses the cause of the violent crime mentioned in the op, or my response attempting to educate you right wing racists. What we are doing as a society is to feed the cycle of poverty, crime and prison before we release someone back into society who has had to employ brute force to survive and adopt values that are contrary to a civilized community. Society has spent a ton of money to take a criminal out of society, make them worse and then release them back into society.

As far as all that other bulletin board nonsense about a game I’m playing, I have one or two friends on this board and maybe 10 personalities that I like but I’ve never been a joiner of clicks and I’m not highly concerned about my GB rep. Also, making you look like an asshole doesn’t motivate me as I can see, you don’t need my help.

No, you cannot man up. You are still engaging in the same behavior. You do not want a discussion, for the reasons outlined. You seem to buy into the quip, "L'audace, l'audace, toujours l'audace!," but your battle cry is that of the typical keyboard commando.

Spelling errors? The Latin a priori? or Bastiat?

"RW-racists" is just the corrupted communal thought process of the modern-liberal. I'd really like to know on what grounds you wish to label me a racist other than you do not agree with me (without fact, just opinion). I even said that what we are doing is feeding the cycle of poverty though governmental altruism, but you probably missed that part, or, more probably got pissed when I pointed out that it was actually the liberal Democrat who created the cycle and, at the same time, the phenomenon of "white flight" which when called out by kbate I showed was now being mirrored by a black flight form the urban Democrat strongholds. Who wants to be stolen from just to give it all to people who prefer to remain feral as long as the opportunity is there?

As for being long-winded, I know that the modern liberal prefers bumper-stickers, mantras, sophisms, one-hour who-dunnits, and simply-written and vapid fiction of no depth as a fantastic substitution to actual thought.
 
Last edited:
I doubt hispanics will continue growing through birthrate in a decade or two and contrary to popular belief there are quite a few fairly light skinned hispanics.

Meanwhile, the Hispanic population would more than double, from 53.3 million in 2012 to 128.8 million in 2060. Consequently, by the end of the period, nearly one in three U.S. residents would be Hispanic, up from about one in six today.

https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/population/cb12-243.html
 
No, you cannot man up. You are still engaging in the same behavior. You do not want a discussion, for the reasons outlined. You seem to buy into the quip, "L'audace, l'audace, toujours l'audace!," but your battle cry is that of the typical keyboard commando.

Spelling errors? The Latin a priori? or Bastiat?

"RW-racists" is just the corrupted communal thought process of the modern-liberal. I'd really like to know on what grounds you wish to label me a racist other than you do not agree with me (without fact, just opinion). I even said that what we are doing is feeding the cycle of poverty though governmental altruism, but you probably missed that part, or, more probably got pissed when I pointed out that it was actually the liberal Democrat who created the cycle and, at the same time, the phenomenon of "white flight" which when called out by kbate I showed was now being mirrored by a black flight form the urban Democrat strongholds. Who wants to be stolen from just to give it all to people who prefer to remain feral as long as the opportunity is there?

As for being long-winded, I know that the modern liberal prefers bumper-stickers, mantras, sophisms, one-hour who-dunnits, and simply-written and vapid fiction of no depth as a fantastic substitution to actual thought.

We both know the answer to that one. If you don't toe the line of keeping the black man (and other selected groups) in a state of perpetual poverty and dependence then you are a racist (or homophobe, or misogynist depending on the group under discussion).

Moynihan, who was one of the architects of the "War on Poverty" looked back on the social destruction it had caused and remarked that it was a case of "defining deviancy downwards." Would that all liberals be that intellectually honest.

Ishmael
 
We both know the answer to that one. If you don't toe the line of keeping the black man (and other selected groups) in a state of perpetual poverty and dependence then you are a racist (or homophobe, or misogynist depending on the group under discussion).

Moynihan, who was one of the architects of the "War on Poverty" looked back on the social destruction it had caused and remarked that it was a case of "defining deviancy downwards." Would that all liberals be that intellectually honest.

Ishmael

Yes, yes, #ThosePeople should just #GetOverIt. :rolleyes:
 
I doubt hispanics will continue growing through birthrate in a decade or two and contrary to popular belief there are quite a few fairly light skinned hispanics.

I guess you have never dated a young hispanic woman......just saying
 
That is kinda what I think it will take. Next generation will be talking about trayvon and brown. But that doesn't have the traction of the hard core discrimination and violence against blacks for basically no reason but skin color like the sixties.

One of the guys staying here is 1/2 German 1/2 Mexican. He says society just needs to fuck each-other to the same shade.

They may be talking about them but the conversation will go about like the conversation people have about OJ.
 
Today the blacks are loosing ground. The Mexicans are taking their place.
People are learning they are much more honest and hard working people.
About the only thing the blacks can do is set home and collect welfare checks.
Really not much use for them. They cost more than they are worth.
 
Today the blacks are loosing ground. The Mexicans are taking their place.
People are learning they are much more honest and hard working people.
About the only thing the blacks can do is set home and collect welfare checks.
Really not much use for them. They cost more than they are worth.

Bye!!
 
Meanwhile, the Hispanic population would more than double, from 53.3 million in 2012 to 128.8 million in 2060. Consequently, by the end of the period, nearly one in three U.S. residents would be Hispanic, up from about one in six today.

https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/population/cb12-243.html

I've seen the stats, I just don't find myself inclined to believe it, but I may end up being wrong. It won't hurt my feelings much.

I guess you have never dated a young hispanic woman......just saying


wait.....whut? :confused:

I think he's suggesting they are only good for breeding. However considering how most people from other countries assimilate within a generation or two I have no reason to doubt that the same thing will happen with the Hispanics. It's easy to forget how recently Americans stopped having broods like that. Depending on how old you are it could be you parents or grand parents but how many of them are one out of five or more? Of the grandparents I met (one was dead before my parents even met) two were in families of six children and the other four.

Today the blacks are loosing ground. The Mexicans are taking their place.
People are learning they are much more honest and hard working people.
About the only thing the blacks can do is set home and collect welfare checks.
Really not much use for them. They cost more than they are worth.

Least racist guy is honest.
 
Least racist guy is honest.

I am not really a racist. I am a realist.
I measure each person with the same measuring stick.
The color don't matter. What kind of a person they are does matter.

If a black person does something and I say something about it I will say the same thing about a white person who does the same thing.

For some reason people think everyone should be treated equal but we are not allowed to do that. If we treat everyone equal we are called racist. I don't know who it was that came up with the idea people would be more likely to treat everyone like equals if one race was gives special treatment but he was one dumb fucker.

People will treat everyone equal when everyone is considered equal.

People can call me whatever they want.
If a person is a sorry mother fucker and happens to be black that does not make him anything else. Same thing if he is white. If he is a sorry mother fucker being white does not chance that.
 
No, you cannot man up. You are still engaging in the same behavior. You do not want a discussion, for the reasons outlined. You seem to buy into the quip, "L'audace, l'audace, toujours l'audace!," but your battle cry is that of the typical keyboard commando.

Spelling errors? The Latin a priori? or Bastiat?

"RW-racists" is just the corrupted communal thought process of the modern-liberal. I'd really like to know on what grounds you wish to label me a racist other than you do not agree with me (without fact, just opinion). I even said that what we are doing is feeding the cycle of poverty though governmental altruism, but you probably missed that part, or, more probably got pissed when I pointed out that it was actually the liberal Democrat who created the cycle and, at the same time, the phenomenon of "white flight" which when called out by kbate I showed was now being mirrored by a black flight form the urban Democrat strongholds. Who wants to be stolen from just to give it all to people who prefer to remain feral as long as the opportunity is there?

As for being long-winded, I know that the modern liberal prefers bumper-stickers, mantras, sophisms, one-hour who-dunnits, and simply-written and vapid fiction of no depth as a fantastic substitution to actual thought.

Man you guys really have trouble staying on topic if you don't like the answers....but that is an entirely other matter. I was not referring to your use of latin; I was referring to several other misspelled words. I would point them out but it is too painful to read your babble even once.
 
What do you base that on. Look at Mexico City, there's 21 million people in the Greater Mexico City area, it's the largest metropolitan area in the Western Hemisphere and when asked, 40% have already said they want to come here some day.

He made it up....without checking the facts.
 
Back
Top