Should the u.S stop fuunding the U.N

Dazzle1

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Posts
2,042
Currently the U.S contributes 25 % of the U.N budget.

Since this organzation promotes racist policies and does not serve our interests, why should we give them money?
 
Currently the U.S contributes 25 % of the U.N budget.

Since this organzation promotes racist policies and does not serve our interests, why should we give them money?

Your post serves as a reminder as to why organisations like the UN are necessary.
 
Why because I call out this corrupt group

Take Israel off the table for a second.

How about the rapes by U.N workers in Africa, how about them doing nothing on the Russia invasion of GA or the human right violations in Venezuela, Cuba and Bolivia?
 
Why because I call out this corrupt group

Take Israel off the table for a second.

How about the rapes by U.N workers in Africa, how about them doing nothing on the Russia invasion of GA or the human right violations in Venezuela, Cuba and Bolivia?

Is alleged rape and inaction corruption? How so?
 
Did you read the post or just ignore it?

None of you want to answer why the U.S should have to fund so much of the U.N budget?

Let us pay the percentage of our vote.
 
The USA is still owe the UN millions from the last time it stopped paying its dues.
 
It's called "United Nations", not "United US-friendly Nations".

Why don't you leave your selfjust view of the world as you expect from every dictator in the world to do so?
 
It's called "United Nations", not "United US-friendly Nations".

Why don't you leave your selfjust view of the world as you expect from every dictator in the world to do so?

all true

but still answer why the US pays 25% and should pay 25%
 
Becasue we do so much good for the world we should have a great say in these bodies than a tin pot dictatorship like Venezuela

Either that or give us the money back
 
No, they should apply a relevance test to them.

Move the whole kit'n caboodle to Haiti and give them ten years to prove they are relevant and effective by attempting to unfuck the place, If they can do that, then we will pay attention to them, if they cannot, let them go beg the Chinese and Saudis for their play money.
 
all true

but still answer why the US pays 25% and should pay 25%

Maybe because you don't have the balls to negotiate a lower rate that makes the UN still working ?

USA must be dumb as hell if they really want to leave the UN. It's like saying goodbye to civilization. But do you really think things turn better in the UN for the US if they pay LESS?
 
It's called "United Nations", not "United US-friendly Nations".

Why don't you leave your selfjust view of the world as you expect from every dictator in the world to do so?

Then why are we cheering and acting all self-important every time we take out once of the human-rights abusing pieces of shit?

We do not buy into the moral-relative view of other cultures ruled by thugs.


541850027_2348cb0b8c.jpg

That makes me a model fucking citizen.
 
Did you read the post or just ignore it?

None of you want to answer why the U.S should have to fund so much of the U.N budget?

Let us pay the percentage of our vote.

Tis true, Daz, I don't really read much of what you post. It takes me too long to find a germ of wisdom amid the burning flames of bullshitdom.
 
Maybe because you don't have the balls to negotiate a lower rate that makes the UN still working ?

USA must be dumb as hell if they really want to leave the UN. It's like saying goodbye to civilization. But do you really think things turn better in the UN for the US if they pay LESS?

LOON!


the UN and CIVILIZATION in the same breath is like saying GERMANY and PEACEFUL CO-EXISTANCE in the same breath


go kill some people and STFU
 
LOON!


the UN and CIVILIZATION in the same breath is like saying GERMANY and PEACEFUL CO-EXISTANCE in the same breath


go kill some people and STFU

Busy, careful there, old chap, you're liable to burst a blood vessel with all the repressed anger. What's ailing you really?

Care to tell uncle Charlie?
 
yes. stop funding the corruption

What corruption are you referring to?

Personally, seems like the US has the loudest voice anyway. It may only have '1 vote' but still has the clout, nouse and wherewithall to apply pressure on other voters at will in most circumstances.

...and if it can't get enough votes it does tend to find a way to go ahead with its own agenda anyway.

This recent UN recognition of Palestine was a genuine surprise to me. I didn't think the UN would get its shit together with all the threats coming from the US and Israel. Even us (UK), the self-styled adoring poodle, abstained.

The irony, for me at least anyway, is that Israel's shenanigans with Palestine the past few years have actually turned a lot of previously sympathetic states/people against them.

Killing 100 Palestinians for every 1 Jew and illegal settlement building hasn't been good PR for them.

I say YES! USA fund only proportionately to your voting power but don't expect any more unofficial UN favours under the table.

Let's face it, the UN as a functioning organisation is totally inept anyway.

Will never forget the ineptitude of the UN peace keepers as they watched genocide unfold on all sides in Yugoslavia.
 
The UN is where we go to recruit spies and bribe foreign officials. New York makes it sooo much easier for us.
 
Becasue we do so much good for the world we should have a great say in these bodies than a tin pot dictatorship like Venezuela

Either that or give us the money back

ahahahahaaa!

Typical American bozo, crying because he doesn't get his way!
 
Maybe because you don't have the balls to negotiate a lower rate that makes the UN still working ?

USA must be dumb as hell if they really want to leave the UN. It's like saying goodbye to civilization. But do you really think things turn better in the UN for the US if they pay LESS?

It was created to supposedly prevent W.W. III, so far it seems to work but stay tuned.

Iran wants nukes.
 
Back
Top