Should an author tell the exact size of a man's member?

[TxRad]

You had me going there, until the end. Tape measure foreplay is a nice way to get acquainted. It helps bridge that awkward space after you've decided to get a room or just do it in the car.

Now we know why all those soccer moms drive minivans.

You can only have sex in a Mini Cooper if it has a sun roof. <<<< The voice of experience.

 

[Pure]

demurrer

y'all are taking porn writing too seriously. it's not supposed to read like updike or f. occonner.

there is a style we may call humorous or 'over the top' or 'tall tale.' it works fine. as an example of the latter:

Paul Bunyan was a mountain of a man; he stood 10 feet and 4 inches tall, and could eat 200 pancakes and 100 sausages for breakfast. because of his 40 in biceps, he could crush a rampaging bear.

i won't hunt up examples, but Southern's _Candy_ and Sade's _Juliette_ come to mind. porn aims at arousal, not delicacy, so saying "her clit was a big as a man's thumb" or "Rinaldo's member exceeded 20 cm, and when erect,4 average sized parrots could perch on it."

that said, good writing aims at freshness, and the laziness of bad porn writers and commonness of their formulas. Hence "Rinaldo's erection was steel hard", as compared with "Rinaldo's monster has the resilience of spring steel and was thicker than her wrist."


l

 

[darkknight01]

The QUEEN of Size Queens. Would it be wrong to assume the woman who says Ten in is to small for her is a slut? I know it wouldn't necessarily mean she's a slut, but to think she's most likely a slut, would that be wrong?

I think it would be wrong to assume a woman is a slut if she likes her man to be ten inches or more. So she like them big, doesn't mean she sleeps around with every guy that has a big one. If a guy things that D-cups are small, does it mean that he is a dog?

 

[darkknight01]

y'all are taking porn writing too seriously. it's not supposed to read like updike or f. occonner.

there is a style we may call humorous or 'over the top' or 'tall tale.' it works fine. as an example of the latter:

Paul Bunyan was a mountain of a man; he stood 10 feet and 4 inches tall, and could eat 200 pancakes and 100 sausages for breakfast. because of his 40 in biceps, he could crush a rampaging bear.

i won't hunt up examples, but Southern's _Candy_ and Sade's _Juliette_ come to mind. porn aims at arousal, not delicacy, so saying "her clit was a big as a man's thumb" or "Rinaldo's member exceeded 20 cm, and when erect,4 average sized parrots could perch on it."

that said, good writing aims at freshness, and the laziness of bad porn writers and commonness of their formulas. Hence "Rinaldo's erection was steel hard", as compared with "Rinaldo's monster has the resilience of spring steel and was thicker than her wrist."


l

No I don't think it has to be like a master novel but I think we all read erotica for passion, arousal, and creativity. When I read "Steve was 10 inches..." or "Jane had 34D's..." I'm kind of done with the story at that point. What's wrong with wanting more from your erotica? And I don't care to read an erotic "tall tale", but that is just me.

 

[bronzeage]

Now we know why all those soccer moms drive minivans.

You can only have sex in a Mini Cooper if it has a sun roof. <<<< The voice of experience.

I will remember that. On long trips, I carry a Mini as a spare.

http://www.aww-kittah-aww.com/up/files/2993/buick_2153.jpg

 

[Stella_Omega]

The QUEEN of Size Queens. Would it be wrong to assume the woman who says Ten in is to small for her is a slut? I know it wouldn't neccesarily mean she's a slut, but to think she's most likely a slut, would that be wrong?

yeah, it would be wrong to make that assumption, for crissake.

*sigh* You know how some people have a size five shoe and some people wear a size eleven? And you know, of course that the size of their foot has nothing to do with how many miles they've walked?

Same principle.

 

[bronzeage]

The QUEEN of Size Queens. Would it be wrong to assume the woman who says Ten in is to small for her is a slut? I know it wouldn't neccesarily mean she's a slut, but to think she's most likely a slut, would that be wrong?

No more that it would be to call a man who prefers 38DDD breasts or larger, a man-whore.

The man-whore does have the advantage in a tits vs. dick preference. He is less likely to be surprised.

On the other hand, there are probably a lot more 38DDD breasts in the world, than 10 inch penises.

 

[darkknight01]

yeah, it would be wrong to make that assumption, for crissake.

*sigh* You know how some people have a size five shoe and some people wear a size eleven? And you know, of course that the size of their foot has nothing to do with how many miles they've walked?

Same principle.

Very well Said

 

[Stella_Omega]

y'all are taking porn writing too seriously. it's not supposed to read like updike or f. occonner.

there is a style we may call humorous or 'over the top' or 'tall tale.' it works fine. as an example of the latter:

Paul Bunyan was a mountain of a man; he stood 10 feet and 4 inches tall, and could eat 200 pancakes and 100 sausages for breakfast. because of his 40 in biceps, he could crush a rampaging bear.

i won't hunt up examples, but Southern's _Candy_ and Sade's _Juliette_ come to mind. porn aims at arousal, not delicacy, so saying "her clit was a big as a man's thumb" or "Rinaldo's member exceeded 20 cm, and when erect,4 average sized parrots could perch on it."

that said, good writing aims at freshness, and the laziness of bad porn writers and commonness of their formulas. Hence "Rinaldo's erection was steel hard", as compared with "Rinaldo's monster has the resilience of spring steel and was thicker than her wrist."


l

Who is this Rinaldo, all the ladies want to meet him!

 

[darkknight01]

Who is this Rinaldo, all the ladies want to meet him!

LOL yes, who is this guy?