Rupert Murdoch

[Bad_Doggie]

and apart from all that, what about corporate responsibility? If the murdochs really didn't know, how fucking incompetent is that?

Very, the way that they are all carrying on there is no structure and no one is responsible for anything.

Basically, the argument that they are using “we didn’t know” oh and we’re very, very, very sorry!

Really, they can do little else at this point; their dishonesty has led them to it. What their shareholders make of it is anybody’s guess.

But, how believable is this?

How come one of the most powerful and richest men in the world, one who employs 1000’s of investigative journalists, 1000’s more private investigators couldn’t find documentation that THEY gave to their lawyers.

Better yet Les Hinton, a senior aide to Rupert Murdoch, tells a Commons committee that a "rigorous internal investigation” found no evidence of widespread hacking at the paper. They didn’t think to read the documentation they gave their lawyers. And when they did they were shocked, because how could they know 11,000 pages of documents about phone hacking might actually contain evidence of phone hacking?

Better yet Press Complaints Commission, published a report on hacking but said it found no evidence of wrongdoing at the NoW based on the NoW internal investigation. Then Murdoch says they took no further action based on the PCC report. What?

Add on to this the cosy employment exchange scheme between the met, the Pm and News international, the met also being in possession of yet another 11 000 documents about phone hacking that they also just didn't get around to looking at.

But, the Guardian and a few other researchers manage to discover further evidence of hacking passed the one rogue reporter. Well how about that!

Millions paid to Gordon Taylor and Max Clifford that again no one knew about, dunno may-be the cleaner signed that one off.

So in the end, no not incompetent at all, sure acting like they are though.

One of their closest execs and personal friend is engaging in criminal activity and they don't know? If that is really the case then neither of them deserve to be in post.

Desperate isn’t it?

Woof!

 

[Karen Kraft]

With News of the World representing less than 1% of their company, it's not surprising that the people at the top didn't get personally involved, preferring to leave it up to locals who, as it turns out, were unworthy of the Murdochs' trust.

Or.... one can look at it in terms of strict responsibility vesting with chief executives. In that case, Barack Obama should be investigated regarding the conduct of Major Nidal Malik Hasan, who will be arraigned today. Yeah, you're right. Obama must be incompetent in that he failed to take notice of the warning signs before the Fort Hood shooting. How incompetent is that?

 

[busybody..]

and apart from all that, what about corporate responsibility? If the murdochs really didn't know, how fucking incompetent is that? One of their closest execs and personal friend is engaging in criminal activity and they don't know? If that is really the case then neither of them deserve to be in post.

gee whiz BITCH

NEWS CORP has 50,000 people working for it

That Rupe didnt know is probable

When we AXED how come NIGGER sat in the PEW of a RACIST VILE CRAZED preacher for 20 years

NIGGER DEFENDERS SAID HE DIDNT KNOW

SO FUCK OFF, VILE BITCH!

 

[Karen Kraft]

Obama's employee:

http://angrywhitedude.com/wp-content/uploads2/2011/07/MAJOR-hasan-nidal.jpg​

 

[busybody..]

Obama's employee:

http://angrywhitedude.com/wp-content/uploads2/2011/07/MAJOR-hasan-nidal.jpg​

His new Tolly Rance Czar

 

[Sean]

With News of the World representing less than 1% of their company, it's not surprising that the people at the top didn't get personally involved, preferring to leave it up to locals who, as it turns out, were unworthy of the Murdochs' trust.

Or.... one can look at it in terms of strict responsibility vesting with chief executives. In that case, Barack Obama should be investigated regarding the conduct of Major Nidal Malik Hasan, who will be arraigned today. Yeah, you're right. Obama must be incompetent in that he failed to take notice of the warning signs before the Fort Hood shooting. How incompetent is that?

Yeah, Rebeckah Wade, editor of the news of the screws, was so unworthy of Murdoch's trust he made her CEO of News International and sacrificed one of the oldest papers in the world to try and save her from the axe.

 

[cjh]

Yeah, Rebeckah Wade, editor of the news of the screws, was so unworthy of Murdoch's trust he made her CEO of News International and sacrificed one of the oldest papers in the world to try and save her from the axe.

Not to mention that Les dude who has been with him near 50 years.

 

[Wrong Element]

Yeah, Rebeckah Wade, editor of the news of the screws, was so unworthy of Murdoch's trust he made her CEO of News International and sacrificed one of the oldest papers in the world to try and save her from the axe.

Yeah, to carry on Karen's analogy, I'm pretty sure Obama does personally know everyone in his cabinet. And no one is implying Murdoch should or does send Christmas cards to every newsstand owner who sells the Post.

But keep defending your boy, kids! We report, you decide!

 

[Sean]

One wonders why Rupert was still paying the legal expenses of the convicted PI at the centre of all this up until THIS MORNING.

 

[cjh]

One wonders why Rupert was still paying the legal expenses of the convicted PI at the centre of all this up until THIS MORNING.

I think the Board pulled that plug. They've hired their own counsel.

 

[Karen Kraft]

Yeah, to carry on Karen's analogy, I'm pretty sure Obama does personally know everyone in his cabinet. And no one is implying Murdoch should or does send Christmas cards to every newsstand owner who sells the Post.

But keep defending your boy, kids! We report, you decide!

We'll report when Obama's good buddy, Hasan, faces the firing squad. Uh-oh, being pro-terrorist, do you think Obama might pardon his pal?

 

[busybody..]

Murdoch's Trojan Horse, Courtesy of the Muslim World .
Tuesday, 19 July 2011 04:30 Eliana Benador .THE MAN OF THE IMAM
In the witch-hunt of the XXIst century, which started at the onset of this month (July 2011), a scandal has erupted, reminiscent of Medieval witch-hunts, which, had it happened in the Middle Ages, it would have likely ended at the mast fire.

The scandal started with the alleged corruption and criminality in regard with the News of the World and London’s Metropolitan Police. However, the actual scandal was nurtured not by the public but, surprise, this time, by members of the British Parliament, the BBC and the left-wing media going for Murdoch’s jugular.

» If you like this article, please support Right Side NewsTo add spice to the concoction, American “justice” has now joined in the witch-hunt, making this an all-round, all-time ruthless persecution of Australian-born American mogul, Rupert Murdoch.

WHAT’S AT THE ORIGIN OF THIS ORDEAL?
Irrational anger suddenly erupted because of Murdoch’s NewsCorp intention to buy BSkyB Television, where he anyway had some 39% shares.

That caused, apparently, the ire of the BBC and the majority of Murdoch’s newspaper rivals who ended up angry and shouting at the government, in the name of pluralism, something in the kind of “stop him.”

Whether one wants to envision all the goodness the media benefitted from Murdoch’s contribution or not, especially for Conservatives but also for others, his presence improved journalistic standards and enlarged the accessibility to information for the general public.

As British author Sir William Shawcross explains: “Then in 1981 Rupert Murdoch bought Times Newspapers and moved production of them and the Sun and the News of the World to Wapping. There, with the help of Margaret Thatcher’s new labour laws, he did battle with the unions. It was brutal but he won a famous and vital victory. Today there would probably be no Guardian, no Independent, no Daily Telegraph if Murdoch had not made the industry profitable. Pluralism in British newspapers today is thanks to Murdoch. Similarly with television. At the end of the 1980s, Murdoch launched Sky TV to break the monopoly of the BBC and ITV. Sky was derided by intellectual snobs as “council-house television”. Building it was a huge struggle but now BSkyB, of which Murdoch’s company owns 39.1 per cent, has 10 million subscribers. Sky News is a constant challenge to the BBC and its conventional, left-of-centre wisdom.”

The brutal explosion of this news and the hysterical evolution on a day by day basis, climaxed today with news that “A former journalist who told the New York Times that phone hacking at Rupert Murdoch’s now defunct News of the World was more extensive than the paper had acknowledged at the time, was found dead,” according Monday’s media reports. Unsurprisingly, the police did not hesitate to immediately specify, the death seemed “natural”.

Today (TU19July2011) Rupert Murdoch and his son James will be put on the spot by the British Parliament in what has been probably one of the most rapidly set hearings in recent times.

The intricate details of this situation are vastly reported in the media. I will, however, get into another aspect of this sordid story.

WHO WOULD MURDOCH’S DOWNFALL BENEFIT?
The Arab Broadcast Forum, held a couple of times in Abu Dhabi, was a platform to present the progress report made by the media within the Arab Muslim world, and without. The fora counted not only with Al Jazeera, Dubai 1, the Lebanese Broadcast Corporation (LBC) and other regional outlets, but also with notable Western outfits such as CNN, Bloomberg, BBC, and Fox among others, in their quest to find new markets at a time that Western economies were shrinking by the day.

Allow me to backtrack to 2001:

When the massacres of 9/11 happened, in October 2011, a Saudi Prince, Al Waleed Bin Talal, gave Mayor Giuliani a check for 10 million dollars, after a Thursday morning memorial service at Ground Zero, the site of the World Trade Center towers destroyed in the attacks.

The prince offered his condolences to the people of New York, but after the ceremony he released a statement suggesting the United States "must address some of the issues that led to such a criminal attack.”

In a memorable response-statement, the Mayor of New York, rebuked the Prince saying: “I entirely reject that statement," Giuliani said. "There is no moral equivalent for this [terrorist] act. There is no justification for it. The people who did it lost any right to ask for justification for it when they slaughtered 4,000 or 5,000 innocent people.”

WHO is Saudi Prince Al Waleed Bin Talal?

Prince Al Waleed is a Saudi Arabian billionaire, member of the Al Saud Royal family. His investments span industries and continents, from the Muslim world to Europe and the United States, he succeeded amassing a fortune through investments in stock market and real estate, from Citibank to Citigroup and Citicorp. He also made large investments on AOL, Apple, Microsoft, and many others -including Murdoch’s NewsCorp, where he initially had acquired 5% of shares, but as of 2010 he’s reported to own 7% of NewsCorp shares.

The Prince’s owns a diversified global financial investment firm, Kingdom Holding Company, and his net worth by 2011 is 19.6 billion.

It’s important to note that he also owns Rotana Media as well as Fox Middle East, and numerous other media outfits.

Fast forward to today.

FINAL GAMBIT?

In his article titled: “Murdoch -you will miss him when he’s gone,” published in The Spectator, July 16, 2011, Shawcross writes: “Beware of what you wish for. If Murdoch’s business is destroyed, the diversity of British media will suffer seriously. Who might gather up the wreckage of the Times? Well, maybe Oleg Deripaska.”

Deripaska, born 1968, is the youngest Russian-born oligarch with a net worth of 16.6 billion dollars, in 2011, with a vast amount of investments throughout diverse fields and countries.

However, the one who, in my opinion is more prone to gather up wreckage of NewsCorp -especially now that American “justice” has joined the witch-hunt with its arm the FBI, would be -surprise- none other than H.R.H. Prince Al Waleed Bin Talal Al Saud, the seemingly quiet and silent character in the background and yet too close for comfort to the Murdochs.

Murdoch, the conservative media mogul made a dalliance when he accepted doing business with the man who supports the Imam promoting the next-to-Ground Zero mosque.

Read these from the New York Times: “Remarks by Dan Senor, a former Bush administration official, on Fox News this week led to a call to boycott the channel. In an awkward moment on Fox News this week, a pundit suggested that a member of the Saudi royal family who has supported the bridge-building work of the imam behind a planned Muslim community center and mosque in Lower Manhattan “funds radical madrasas all over the world.” The awkwardness came from the fact — unmentioned by anyone on the Fox set — that the same Saudi, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, also happens to be the second-largest shareholder in News Corp., the parent company of the Fox News Channel.”

How could Murdoch have made such a mistake...? All seems to indicate that the seasoned mogul might have been misled by someone trustworthy, because Prince Al Waleed’s suave manners and elegant custom-made tailored suits are the fanciest shell hiding the underlying essence of creeping, radical Islam in America and the world (yes, the UK included...)

Reportedly, last Friday, the Prince urged Rebekkah Brooks, Murdoch’s right hand in News of the World, to quit -bold, assertive move for a man who only owns 7% of Fox...

But let’s not forget his words to Giuliani in the aftermath of the 9/11 massacres perpetrated by Muslim terrorists against American innocent civilians in times of peace: “the United States must address some of the issues that led to such a criminal attack.”

Last May 19, 2011, on Cavuto, the Prince said: “And I think the Netanyahu position today proves conclusively to the world but more importantly to our friends in the United States that the main obstacle to peace is really Israel, not the Arab world.”

Muslims have infiltrated British life at all levels. My personal experience is that even throughout the ranks of the Parliament, there are “friends” galore of the Muslims, including business partners.

"Business", the magic word...

And the situation is similar here in America, where President Barack Hussein Obama, a true friend of Islam at the expense even of America’s security and interest, has recently instructed his Administration to officially recognize the Muslim Brotherhood -with whom they will soon begin talks on behalf of America.

The Muslim world is filled with intrigue and conspiracy, and students of History know it.

And, why would they be engineering this?

“Maybe” because it’s about time for them to take over our media bastion of conservatism and its founder, the resolute builder of conservative media in the West. That is the challenge and succeeding in overtaking it would be indeed an achievement.

In the end, once again, greed might be the weapon of choice for the enemy. Murdoch might have jeopardized not only his soul and his business but his children’s inheritance. But there is way more than that at stake here.

I may be wrong.

But what if I am not?

Goodwill Ambassador Eliana Benador is a national and international political adviser, global strategist and the former CEO and founder of Benador Associates. She can be followed on Twitter and on her political page on Facebook and her business page on Facebook

 

[Sean]

I think the Board pulled that plug. They've hired their own counsel.

Yep, but only this morning. His solicitor found out when the BBC rang her about 11 o'clock.

 

[Bad_Doggie]

With News of the World representing less than 1% of their company, it's not surprising that the people at the top didn't get personally involved, preferring to leave it up to locals who, as it turns out, were unworthy of the Murdochs' trust.

So I’m off iggi huh? Have the SEALS been round to get yer tomato plants yet?

Yeah they spun that line which you swallowed. No surprise really.

Do you really think that Murdoch didn’t get personally involved and took no interest in this case after November 2005, when Buckingham Palace suspected the prince's voicemail was hacked to get a story and in December called in Scotland Yard?

Something that could potentially cause great damage and financial loss to his company and remember NoW was a special newspaper for Murdoch, it was his first National UK paper and his flag ship for years.

How about in 2007 when Clive Goodman, the News of the World's former royal editor, and private investigator Glenn Mulcaire were jailed for illegally accessing the royal phone messages. No concern there? No cause to enquire further what was going on at NoW? No need to keep an eye on NoW?
He didn’t know? It was in all the worlds media.

He never saw any balance sheets for NoW, never wondered where the large (hush money) payments were going? Never asked anyone?

Also remember that since 2007 James’ office was in Wapping right next to Brookes office. He never had a chat with her about all this, never passed it on to his father.

Incompetent or deliberate concealment, what a choice.

Or.... one can look at it in terms of strict responsibility vesting with chief executives. In that case, Barack Obama should be investigated regarding the conduct of Major Nidal Malik Hasan, who will be arraigned today. Yeah, you're right. Obama must be incompetent in that he failed to take notice of the warning signs before the Fort Hood shooting. How incompetent is that?

If Major Nidal Malik Hasan remained in his post after the shooting with Obama and other officers covering up the shooting and he went on to carry out many more you may have a point. Did that happen?

Woof

 

[cjh]

Yep, but only this morning. His solicitor found out when the BBC rang her about 11 o'clock.

That's pretty significant. The Board thinks it has a possible conflict with management.

 

[Sean]

That's pretty significant. The Board thinks it has a possible conflict with management.

Outrage over here when they admitted it at the SC hearing yesterday. Shareholders are getting rather antsy, but Rupert has the votes so they can go fuck themselves.

 

[where]

So I’m off iggi huh? Have the SEALS be round to get yer tomato plants yet?

Yeah they spun that line which you swallowed. No surprise really.

Do you really think that Murdoch didn’t get personally involved and took no interest in this case after November 2005, when Buckingham Palace suspected the prince's voicemail was hacked to get a story and in December called in Scotland Yard?

Something that could potentially cause great damage and financial loss to his company and remember NoW was a special newspaper for Murdoch, it was his first National UK paper and his flag ship for years.

How about in 2007 when Clive Goodman, the News of the World's former royal editor, and private investigator Glenn Mulcaire were jailed for illegally accessing the royal phone messages. No concern there? No cause to enquire further what was going on at NoW? No need to keep an eye on NoW?
He didn’t know? It was in all the worlds media.

He never saw any balance sheets for NoW, never wondered where the large (hush money) payments were going? Never asked anyone?

Also remember that since 2007 James’ office was in Wapping right next to Brookes office. He never had a chat with her about all this, never passed it on to his father.

Incompetent or deliberate concealment, what a choice.



If Major Nidal Malik Hasan remained in his post after the shooting with Obama and other officers covered up the shooting and he went on to carry out many more you may have a point. Did that happen?

Woof

I don't know why you bother. what the yanks don't get is rupert fucking loved tnotw.

 

[Bad_Doggie]

I don't know why you bother. what the yanks don't get is rupert fucking loved tnotw.

No one’s sending me self porn at the moment

That and a few facts are nice to balance out this bullshit wank fest.

I do have a problem with this media circus. The first of which is the fact that there have been NO criminal charges against those people that were actually engaged in this 'hacking.'

Woof!

 

[where]

No one’s sending me self porn at the moment

That and a few facts are nice to balance out this bullshit wank fest.



Woof!

you know ishy thinks there haven't been any lynchings since the mid 1960s cause the tuskegee archives haven't reported any?

he's a nutter.

you send me self porn and I'll send you some.

 

[rosco rathbone]

Have Kybele & Rebecca Brooks ever been seen together??

 

[busybody..]

we'rent

you

TERRORISTS

supporting

the WIKI guy

and

WIKI LEAKER

yes you were


case closed!

 

[zipman]

What are the odds on Ish ever returning to this thread to respond?

 

[cjh]

Have Kybele & Rebecca Brooks ever been seen together??

rumor has it that on kybele's private porn board are posted photos taken by mr. TRB of kybele "instructing" ms. brooks on proper ass hook technique.

 

[Bad_Doggie]

you know ishy thinks there haven't been any lynchings since the mid 1960s cause the tuskegee archives haven't reported any?

he's a nutter.

you send me self porn and I'll send you some.

It wouldn’t be so bad if he wasn’t such a self-obsessed pompous cunt.

Woof!

 

[Bad_Doggie]

Have Kybele & Rebecca Brooks ever been seen together??

That’s one question that they didn’t, but should’ve asked yesterday.

Kybele, Brookes grudge fuck.

<sits back, yeah working for me>

Woof!