Bramblethorn
Sleep-deprived
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2012
- Posts
- 19,193
This has me trying to figure out whether something like T. Kingfisher's "Saint of Steel" series would count as romantasy: author who already had several non-romance books in a fantasy setting also writes fantasy/romance stories within that setting. Each story has some sort of fantasy adventure plot (who is trying to kill the prince, and why are all these headless corpses showing up?) along with a romance happening within that plot (he's a depressed berserker trying to protect this woman, she's a domestic abuse survivor who's had bad experiences with "protectors", together they fight crime and pine at one another). In terms of carrying the story the fantasy aspect does about 60% of the work and romance 40%.And third, I think romantasy as a genre label is basically a pejorative one. Novels are romantasies when the plots and worldbuilding aren't strong enough to support being called fantasy. Authors that do hit those heights in plotting and worldbuilding often reject the romantasy label -- Jacqueline Carey, for one, absolutely writes what might be considered romantasy, but when left to her own devices calls them historical fantasies. She wrote in her newsletter that (paraphrasing) romantasy is a label that implies shallowness, so while she allows her work to be described that way in marketing she doesn't like it. I think that's basically true, at least about the current boom.
Or something like "This Is How You Lose The Time War", assuming one is willing to admit sufficiently advanced technology as fantasy.