Rittenhouse print will walk

oddly enough, if the gun had been 4" shorter, the judge would have to have allowed that illegal charge to stand. go figure.

That would mean it would have not been legal to sell in Wisconsin. So he probably wouldn't have had access to one with such a barrel anyway.
 
Last edited:
oddly enough, if the gun had been 4" shorter, the judge would have to have allowed that illegal charge to stand. go figure.

The rifle was LEGAL and your "if only" whining about how it "might not have been" doesn't change that at all.
 
Don't you love just how consistently (D)'eez backpedal and claim not to be (D)eez or support the (D)'eez narrative whenever they start getting dragged for the implications of their positions??

"Rittenhouse is a MURDERER!! LOOK HOW SCARY THE GUN LOOKS!!!" = support terrorist right to attack people and deny the victims the right to self defense.

Kinda like abolishing ICE/CBP = open borders....doesn't matter if you specifically say "I support open borders." you effectively do when you support abolishing the LEA that secures them.

Biden and the (D)'eez attack fossil fuel producers/markets?? TRUMPS fault gas prices are up!!!!

It's like NONE of them have EVER stopped to think "what will happen if I actually get what I want??" .

LOL.... what a bunch of fee fees driven idiots who can't think 5 min down the road.

And the punchline is that they think it's rich peoples fault they are shit with their money. :rolleyes:

Nope, none of that has to do with anything I've posted here, and your attempt to deflect from my challenge that you cite where I've ever posted what you lied and claimed I posted falls flat.

You haven't backed up your claim. You are a malicious liar.
 
Nope, none of that has to do with anything I've posted here, and your attempt to deflect from my challenge that you cite where I've ever posted what you lied and claimed I posted falls flat.

You haven't backed up your claim. You are a malicious liar.

Only if you ignore what is posted.

Your defense of the rioting terrorist who violently attacked K. Rittenhouse is all that matters here.

It's open support for BLM terrorists RIGHT to attack people without consiquence... because they're protected and supported by the (D)'eez you also support and vote for. Own your partisanship you partisan pile of shit.

Or don't and cry about it more, your tears are delicious.
 
Last edited:
Nope, none of that has to do with anything I've posted here, and your attempt to deflect from my challenge that you cite where I've ever posted what you lied and claimed I posted falls flat.

You haven't backed up your claim. You are a malicious liar.

That was some serious histrionic ascription word salad from the resident dummy.
 
Your defense of the rioting terrorist who violently attacked K. Rittenhouse is all that matters here.

Compounding your malicious lying. Cite where I have defended a rioting terrorist. On this thread alone, I more than once posted that the rioters should be prosecuted.

You are a liar. You are repeatedly lying. I have challenged you three times to back up your malicious lies about what I've posted on this issue and you have failed to do so. You just have gone on to post yet another lie.

You are a sniveling liar.

I have shown a balanced view on this issue and others that you and your board Trumpette cohorts can't let stand because you are unable to show an ounce of objectivity about anything at all. All you can do is lie about simply everything.
 
Last edited:
Compounding your malicious lying. Cite where I have defended a rioting terrorist.

When you called Rittenhouse a murderer. :)

Unless you're going to come out and support his acquittal and RIGHT to carry a gun and defend himself with it.

That's exactly what you're saying.
 
Poor lil Dumb-Dumb claimed Luk called Rottenhouse a murderer and defended the victims, which Luk never did.

Is that ascription or straight-up lying, dipshit?
 
When you called Rittenhouse a murderer. :)

Unless you're going to come out and support his acquittal and RIGHT to carry a gun and defend himself with it.

That's exactly what you're saying.

You've cited nothing. You are a worthless Russian bot working to pit Americans against Americans.

You are a brazen liar.
 
All this defense of Luk and KeithD's terrorist comrades in this thread... more to follow.

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1555507

attachment.php


You fuckers are on the wrong side again.

Yep. They fucked up and he's gonna get off. Still puts you lot on the wrong side.

I have no idea how this is going to end. But I believe any vigilante who takes a weapon to a protest, no matter where that person or protest is on the spectrum, should go to prison. Ergo, in this instance, I see more than one person, including Rittenhouse, who should go to prison.

Neither one had any business being there with a gun. Both should go to prison. Screw your self-defense argument. The kid wasn't on his front porch. It wasn't his property he was "protecting" (the owners of the property have even declared he was trespassing himself.) He had no business being there. He had no business being anywhere close to a protest--and definitely not with a weapon.

Get a brain. You people are nuts.

Hooray for vigilantism!

Oh, bullshit. He was there to play Trumper stormtrooper. He was trespassing. The owners of the property have declared he wasn't engaged to be there or to protect their property. He was a seventeen-year-old imbecile propagandized on social media by vicious fuckers like you.

You're scum.

Wonder why the board Trumpettes are so nervous about this that they have to flood the board with their sweat. ;)

They don't have to prove to anyone that they are swamp gas. They exhibit that constantly.
 
Keith D in this very thread condemning the right for people to defend themselves from his terrorist comrades and insisting punishment for those that do.

I think there are charges that should stick and the kid should do some time. .
 
More leftist defending their pedo-terrorist comrades.... WEEPING for their loss.


Rittenhouse was not out to protect property or himself. The ammo he used was not the normal ammo used in an AR-15 but rather what the military most likely used in Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan. It does not make a clean entrance wound but rather shreds tissue like a shark, a bear or large dog would.

The prosecutor showed pictures of one guy's upper arm that was hit with Rittenhouse's ammo. The guy will never have normal or anything near normal use of his arm and hand.


Funny how he melted down over him being "threatened and chased" but was fine when describing the murders.
 
Luk and D again trashing the victim.


What's that you posted? That a kid took an illegal AR-15 to a protest and intimidated folks with it (not to mention murdered some)?

And the board Trumpettes think that's just hunky-dory and, of course, would think it was just great if a black kid did it too.


https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1555590


KeithD slanders the victim and peddles outright lies in defense of his rioting pedo comrades RIGHT to violently attack the little WHITE MALE!!! :D

You don't "on your way" to anywhere, especially across state lines, to engage in self-defense. Nor are you engaging in self-defense to be taking an illegally obtained rapid-fire ASSAULT RIFLE with you.

Basically, yes--and if the gun nuts didn't help put an illegal RAPID-FIRE ASSAULT RIFLE in his hands.

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1555598
 
That the prosecution went for the murder charge should tamp down the response to the verdict from the street a bit. If it hadn't, the street would have rioted more than it will, I think, because it didn't try for it.

I think there are charges that should stick and the kid should do some time. I think, though, that the guy who survived but had a handgun should be prosecuted too. I don't remember seeing that he has been.

I think anyone who leaves his/her front porch to go to a protest and takes a lethal weapon with them, no matter what side she/he is on, should be prosecuted and do some prison time to think about what civilized society requires.

Thread Post #7.

Corny is a malicious liar.
 
I think he should get a pass (or it be noted he's human) for crying on the stand. He's basically just a dumb kid bamboozled by despicable programming and he's in a horrific position.

Thread post #151

Corny is a malicious liar.
 
There is no "NUH UHHH!!! because you failed to prove your lies and ascription.

I didn't engage in any ascription.

Learn what that word means before you use it again, get your GED son, it will help I promise.

Luk never called Rottenhouse a murderer and Luk never even mentioned the victims.

On the wrong side of what Luk?? If he was "on the wrong side" as you claim, that makes him a murderer what he was charged with .... so you very much were calling him a murderer.

You called the attackers, your pedo and wife beating BLM comrades he was defending himself from, VICTIMS, victims of what Luk?? :D

Try thinking past the exact words you post.... again with that GED.

Thread Post #7.

Corny is a malicious liar.

Not at all, you highlight that you're anti -civil rights.

All the victim shaming and slander along the way.... just defending those terrorist pedo-comrades of yours he put down for being violent fuckwits. :D
 
Last edited:
Back
Top