Rittenhouse hyperventilating and blubbering like a bitch on the stand.

Doesn't matter. Vigilantism is vigilantism.

You keep avoiding the self defense issue. Why do you argue against your own interest? You might be in a position where you need to use deadly force to protect yourself. You'll be glad that this protection exists.
 
You keep avoiding the self defense issue. Why do you argue against your own interest? You might be in a position where you need to use deadly force to protect yourself. You'll be glad that this protection exists.

The Left has convinced itself (or is simply play-acting for political purposes) that the threat of being gunned down by a Kyle Rittenhouse is far, far greater than being killed by a random criminal. It's utter madness, but it's the Left we'r talking about.
 
You keep avoiding the self defense issue. Why do you argue against your own interest? You might be in a position where you need to use deadly force to protect yourself. You'll be glad that this protection exists.

Bud said the owners of Car Source were happy the vigilantes were there. My point was, it doesn't matter, which it doesn't.

And I hope I will never, short of a genuine revolutionary situation, go looking for armed conflict the way Rittenhouse did.
 
how about we all just cut the bullshit. if he had been black, in kenosha with a weapon and killed 3 white guys the poor asshole's body would still be hanging from the nearest lamp post. you can rationalize it all you want, the little fucker is guilty and the little fucker will walk.

and there's nothing new here so move along until the glory comes.
 
how about we all just cut the bullshit. if he had been black, in kenosha with a weapon and killed 3 white guys the poor asshole's body would still be hanging from the nearest lamp post. you can rationalize it all you want, the little fucker is guilty and the little fucker will walk.

and there's nothing new here so move along until the glory comes.

OJ? Bill Cosby? They did it, but got away with it. It's not your skin color, it's your wallet that determines if you're going home or not.
 
The Left has convinced itself (or is simply play-acting for political purposes) that the threat of being gunned down by a Kyle Rittenhouse is far, far greater than being killed by a random criminal. It's utter madness, but it's the Left we'r talking about.

The threat of being killed by a random criminal is really very low. They're easy to avoid. Most homicide victims are killed by people they know.
 
how about we all just cut the bullshit. if he had been black, in kenosha with a weapon and killed 3 white guys the poor asshole's body would still be hanging from the nearest lamp post. you can rationalize it all you want, the little fucker is guilty and the little fucker will walk.

and there's nothing new here so move along until the glory comes.

No, that's just the race baiting you dangle to persist in your deliberate ignoring of the facts.

He's not guilty of anything, self defense isn't a crime, that's why he should walk.
 
Find out how many paid for their own lawyers and how many used a public defender and get back to me.

Quoted for posterity and stupidity.

The CUbaNTripod clowned himself and he doesn't even realize it.

JFC

SAD!!!

:D
 
how about we all just cut the bullshit. if he had been black, in kenosha with a weapon and killed 3 white guys the poor asshole's body would still be hanging from the nearest lamp post. you can rationalize it all you want, the little fucker is guilty and the little fucker will walk.

and there's nothing new here so move along until the glory comes.
That's disgusting.

If a black man was being chased and threatened and grabbed at and pushed and kicked and beaten with a skateboard and had a guy run at him with a gun, I would be exactly where I am right now, saying that it is self defense. That is principle. It doesn't matter what color he was, the law should see it the same way for us all.

But, wait, are you saying that it would be different if Kyle Rittenhouse was a BLM protester being chased and beaten by proud boys? Would you still have your same opinion if that was the case?

Look, if you change your mind on whether it was self defense or not based off of skin color, you're just a fucking racist.
 
No he didn't. If he did, the self defense argument wouldn't work.

You bring up the point the whole trial revolves around, did he go looking for trouble, or did trouble find him....

Be interesting to see how the jury rules.....they haven't ruled yet have they?
 
Back
Top