He's going to walk free and it will be glorious.
Glorious to none but idiots.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's going to walk free and it will be glorious.
Glorious to none but idiots.
He's going to walk free and it will be glorious.
Not idiots. People who understand the facts and how the law applies to this case.
Still, not glorious to any but idiots. There are none glorious, on the RW side, ever or always.
we don't need vigilantes unless you want to see it all spiral out of anyone's control. I don't think a sane mature person would want that.
We already have a problem with fake cops doing stupid and criminal shit, we don't need vigilantes unless you want to see it all spiral out of anyone's control. I don't think a sane mature person would want that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iapwHLd7NPE
See that ^ was the whole point all along.
I wonder why the Deplorables don't get it.
(We all know why)
Nice dodge! YOU attacked her so you must have thought that she is legit. Too easy, sexist dipshit!
Next!
The troll bro patrol has to look out for its own.
Pathetic really.
He has a problem with the underage gun charge.
Not anymore
Getting off, on a technicality ?
The Daily Beast ✓
Twitter › thedailybeast
Just before jurors heard closing arguments in Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial,
Kenosha Judge Bruce Schroeder accepted a defense motion to dismiss
the charge of possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18—
the only misdemeanor the teenager was facing.
9 minutes ago
dismissed because the statute is incoherent and impossible to understand.
It's actually not. What no one bothered to do is break it down to its component parts and look at it.
If this, than that. If that, then this. If neither, then good to go.
The judge read it all and said he, with a legal education and decades of experience, couldn't make sense of it.