Rittenhouse hyperventilating and blubbering like a bitch on the stand.

Still, not glorious to any but idiots. There are none glorious, on the RW side, ever or always.

It's glorious to anyone that believes in due process. This case probably shouldn't have gone to trial and is proof that overzealous prosecutors make our legal system one where only those that can afford their own attorney have a chance at winning.
 
The world is filled with people whose only infomation about current issues comes from consistently unreliable sources, religious leaders, word of mouth, bureaucrats, and politicians. After hearing something which supports their narrative all sense of curiousity, open mindedness, fairness and intellectual honesty shuts down. They refuse to consider, investigate or research anything which counters their beliefs regardless of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. They're incabable of being wrong. Facts and logic are poison. When confronted with different opinions they resort to name calling, yelling, deflecting the conversation, or injecting red herrings and straw men into the argument because they're unable to support their beliefs. It's so predictable. They're embarrassed. They're just like people who who believe everything in the Bible/Koran/Superman Comics. Anyone who doesn't is branded as evil, stupid, and sub-human.

It's easier to continue believing lies than admit you've been lied to.
 
Getting off, on a technicality ?

The Daily Beast ✓
Twitter › thedailybeast

Just before jurors heard closing arguments in Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial,
Kenosha Judge Bruce Schroeder accepted a defense motion to dismiss
the charge of possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18—
the only misdemeanor the teenager was facing.

9 minutes ago
 
Getting off, on a technicality ?

The Daily Beast ✓
Twitter › thedailybeast

Just before jurors heard closing arguments in Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial,
Kenosha Judge Bruce Schroeder accepted a defense motion to dismiss
the charge of possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18—
the only misdemeanor the teenager was facing.

9 minutes ago

dismissed because the statute is incoherent and impossible to understand.
 
A fight broke out on the courthouse steps during protests outside the trial
of shooter Kyle Rittenhouse

Two people were arrested in front of the Kenosha County Courthouse at around 4 p.m.
on Wednesday

A 20-year-old male was arrested for battery, disorderly conduct, and resisting arrest.
A 34-year-old female was arrested for disorderly conduct.

- Raw Story
 
No Verdict in Rittenhouse Trial as Jurors Depart for the Night

November 18, 2021

Kyle Rittenhouse’s defense team sought a mistrial on Wednesday,
its second such request. The judge has yet to rule on either.

- NY Times

Day 2 of jury deliberation in the Rittenhouse trial ends again without a verdict

November 17, 2021

The jurors spent 46 minutes Wednesday reviewing the drone video and other video
evidence, including another recording of Rittenhouse's encounter with Rosenbaum
filmed from overhead by an FBI aircraft.

Jurors also asked Wednesday to review several other videos, including bystander
footage of Rittenhouse shooting Anthony Huber, 26, and Gaige Grosskreutz,
then 26, and a video filmed by Grosskreutz as he spoke briefly to Rittenhouse
in the moments after shooting Rosenbaum. Grosskreutz survived the shooting,
but Huber was killed. They have not yet reviewed that footage.

https://www.npr.org/2021/11/17/1056650542/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-jury-deliberation-day-two
 
dismissed because the statute is incoherent and impossible to understand.

It's actually not. What no one bothered to do is break it down to its component parts and look at it.

If this, than that. If that, then this. If neither, then good to go.
 
It's actually not. What no one bothered to do is break it down to its component parts and look at it.

If this, than that. If that, then this. If neither, then good to go.

The judge read it all and said he, with a legal education and decades of experience, couldn't make sense of it.
 
The judge read it all and said he, with a legal education and decades of experience, couldn't make sense of it.


Not true.

They reviewed the actual text of the law, argued the interpretations in court, measured the rifle and determined that it wasn't covered under the law and was, therefore, legal for Rittenhouse to carry.

The law is poorly drafted, but that doesn't mean it was incomprehensible. It just needed to be scrutinized carefully to determine what the legislature intended when they wrote it. It's not their fault the DA was too lazy to actually do that before they jumped off the cliff and charged Rittenhouse with violating it.
 
Back
Top