Rittenhouse hyperventilating and blubbering like a bitch on the stand.

One of Rittenhouse’s “victims” was Joseph Rosenbaum. Mr. Rosenbaum was a multi-time pedophile who anally raped a child and sexually assaulted boys ages 9-11 years old.
 
One of Rittenhouse’s “victims” was Joseph Rosenbaum. Mr. Rosenbaum was a multi-time pedophile who anally raped a child and sexually assaulted boys ages 9-11 years old.

I'm sure Rottenhouse had Rosenbaum rap sheet in front of him as he was dishin' out some good ole Murican extrajudicial "summary justice".

Who needs courts anyway, amIright?
 
I'm sure Rottenhouse had Rosenbaum rap sheet in front of him as he was dishin' out some good ole Murican extrajudicial "summary justice".

Who needs courts anyway, amIright?

No, I doubt Kyle had Rosenbaum’s rap sheet but I’m sure we agree that it’s great that he’s dead. We do need courts and Kyle is likely to be found not guilty of murder charges. 🍻
 
I'm sure Rottenhouse had Rosenbaum rap sheet in front of him as he was dishin' out some good ole Murican extrajudicial "summary justice".

Who needs courts anyway, amIright?

The Left spent last summer jacking its limp shrimps over just that, you included, Bobby
 
rittenhouse judge hard against pros. team, allowing def. team to get away with...

...murder? he's pretty keen to wrap it all up (without prejudice, by the looks of things) by allowing the defense team to get away with their expert speaking to things outside the parameters set by same judge:

Lead prosecutor Thomas Binger objected to Black’s testimony. He said Black began to testify about matters far beyond the court’s original order allowing the expert’s testimony about specific gunshots and specific pieces of video evidence. Binger said the defense never sought to expand the testimony beyond those slices in time and “never responded at all” to an order the judge signed long ago to limit the expert’s testimony as indicated.
the judge began the day asking for a round of applause for veterans on veteran day, and oddly enough the only veteran in the room at the time was this same expert...who then got a round of applause from the jury et al and then went right on to deliver his comments.

https://lawandcrime.com/live-trials...nse-witness-was-the-only-veteran-in-the-room/

i don't know this judge at all, so can't say if any of his political/personal leanings colour his actual judgements, but it really doesn't make for a good look. rittenhouse should see time, at least 10 years, imo, but it looks as if he may walk away from this a vaunted and validated figure amongst the crazy magats. He's shown no remorse, nor even any acceptance that his actions were wrong. It's the typical story of trumpies everywhere, deny deny deny, deflect, blame someone else, but never ever ever take responsibility.
 
It's the typical story of trumpies everywhere, deny deny deny, deflect, blame someone else, but never ever ever take responsibility.

It's the typical story of lib/turds everywhere, deny deny deny, deflect, blame someone else, but never ever ever take responsibility.

Just like libs/blm/antifa when they were burning and destroying cities all over the country last summer, but it was only considered "peaceful" protests.
 
Little blubbering bitch pictured with white supremist terrorists showing white power sign.

Yes.... frogs and the ok sign = white supremacy.... in the mind of insane leftist who make everything they don't like about white supremacy, because insane.

Thus the joke.
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2019/12/17/nyregion/15OKsign2/merlin_157582740_6428e5ba-bfa4-405d-8c7a-c51514729d2c-articleLarge.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale


Not that it has anything to do with the trial.
 
Little blubbering bitch pictured with white supremist terrorists showing white power sign.

https://i.redd.it/qekg0hxb35z71.jpg

Yeah, Rottenhouse obviously had a violent racially motivated agenda when he:

1: narrated a video fantasizing about shooting people with his illegal AR-15 a couple weeks before he actually did it.

2: traveled across state lines

3: illegally obtained and possessed an AR-15

4: violated curfew in Kenosha while in possession of his illegal AR-15

5: lied about being enjoined to protect a specific piece of property with his illegal AR-15

6: left said property ^ with his illegal AR-15 after it had been secured behind a police line

7: crossed the police line ^ and entered into an unsecured area with his illegal AR-15

8: began patrolling the unsecured area outside his claimed AOR with his illegal AR-15

9: initiated confrontations with perfectly healthy protesters under the guise of offering "medical" assistance while brandishing his illegal AR-15

10: lied about being an EMT qualified to provide "medical" assistance

11: was caught on video admitting to pointing his illegal AR-15 at a protester long before he fatally shot two people with his illegal AR-15

12: ran up on a protester 3 blocks away from his claimed AOR and pointed his illegal AR-15 in their direction, precipitating a conflict that led to Rottenhouse being chased by an unarmed protester who Rottenhouse ultimately shot four times with his illegal AR-15 in self defense

13: ran away from the scene of the fatal shooting, precipitating a foot chase by people who perceived him to be an active shooter, ultimately shooting two more individuals who tried to apprehend him by use of force; killing one and wounding another

14: retreated back across the state line after Kenosha police demonstrated their bias, and didn't even consider that the white guy with an illegal AR-15 waving them down could possibly be the active shooter they were responding to.

In reality, the Kenosha Police are equally complicit in the shootings because they sanctioned and encouraged the armed vigilantes like Rottenhouse, when they should have considered every civilian out on the streets after curfew as a potential problem.

SAD!!!
 
If he obtained the firearm under false pretenses he could be subject to the same harsh penalty Hunter Biden was slapped with committing the same offense.
 
Crash and burn, bitch.

"Dismissal with prejudice" is a dismissal the judge can do based on prosecutoral misconduct which is intended to try and force a mistrial.

It's a sanction for abuse of the system to prevent punishing a defendant with never ending litigation.

Once the judge does it, the case cannot be retried. The "with prejudice" part can be appealed but the appeals court generally doesn't overrule the trial court on it when the conduct is as egregious as what's being done here.

What conduct?

It's reversible error to even mention that someone invoked their 5th Amendment Right to remain silent.

It's contempt for the prosecution to attempt to introduce evidence the judge has already ruled inadmissible.

Those 2 things alone are sufficient to support a "dismissal with prejudice" and the appeals court won't reverse it to allow the prosecution to refile/relitigate the case.

Crash and burn bitch. Crash and burn.

EXACTLY, their precious feelings and demands don't matter. All that matters is the law. And the relevant facts: such at the prosecutor being way out of line.
 
Yes.... frogs and the ok sign = white supremacy.... in the mind of insane leftist who make everything they don't like about white supremacy, because insane.

It was not leftists who associated the OK sign or the frog with white supremacy. The white supremacists did that themselves.
 
The only narrative I gave was that he took an assault rifle to an out-of-state protest and the owners of the garage claim they didn't ask him to protect their property.

Cite any other narrative I've posted or just stop your lying. I won't hold my breath waiting for that.

That narrative. We can all play the game. Why was Rosembaum out there? Why was he out there when there was a curfew? You keep avoiding the real issue and spinning that narrative. The question the jury needs to answer is did Kyle Rittenhouse have a reasonable fear for his life? If he did, then he was justified in using deadly force.
 
Last edited:
It was not leftists who associated the OK sign or the frog with white supremacy. The white supremacists did that themselves.

The ok sign was actually done as a troll job, but the SJW who see Nazis in their dreams ran with it.
 
I hope we can all at least agree that nobody wants to legitimize Rittenhouse's actions, or encourage emulation.
 
That narrative. We can all play the game. Why was Rosembaum out there? Why was he out there when there was a curfew? You keep avoiding the real issue and spinning that narrative. The question the jury needs to answer is did Kyle Rittenhouse have a reasonable fear for his life? If he did, then he was justified in using deadly force.

Not to mention that several people testified that the Owners of Car Source were quite happy when they found these guys to guard their lot.

The liars here are all trying to lie to keep the mob at bay.
 
Yes.... frogs and the ok sign = white supremacy.... in the mind of insane leftist who make everything they don't like about white supremacy, because insane.

Thus the joke.
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2019/12/17/nyregion/15OKsign2/merlin_157582740_6428e5ba-bfa4-405d-8c7a-c51514729d2c-articleLarge.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale


Not that it has anything to do with the trial.

Hes with white supremists giving the white power sign. No it has nothing to do with the trial but it proves hes a moron and a terrorist sympathizer...much like you.
 
Back
Top