Peregrinator
Hooded On A Hill
- Joined
- May 27, 2004
- Posts
- 89,482
*points and laughs*
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because Bush did such a great job that a speech from him, major power in the party, would sure give Willard a bump! I mean, Bush was awesome! Republicans and independents LOVED him!
And former veep Cheney, too. Remember him?
Really?
This is your OP?
Are you 10?
Bush and Cheney arent on the ballot this time.
Really?
This is your OP?
Are you 10?
Do I need to say any more than that?
Neither is Bill Clinton, and guess what?
How is it that the Dems were perfectly happy to have their prominent former president Clinton come and deliver a slamdunk speech, but the Reps kept George away? Couldn't be that they were afraid the voters would realize they're the party of Bush, Cheney, McCain, Palin, etc, etc, etc?
They're responsible for their own behavior. I'm responsible for mine. If we have a major party that can't find a consistent, prominent leader, then of what use is it?Your second post was actually your OP.
The thing is perg, when we act like children in discussions, how can we expect our politicians not to act as children. After all, it is us they are trying to reach, and if they think childish is the only behavior we relate to, then that's what we get.
We all need to do a bunch a growing up.
Bills a stalking horse for his missus.
This is a dumb argument. It suggests the Dems have no one to be ashamed of.
They're responsible for their own behavior. I'm responsible for mine. If we have a major party that can't find a consistent, prominent leader, then of what use is it?
Bill is a true-blue million watt rock star of a politician and he did a good job as president.
The Republicans have nothing remotely similar.
Not at all. Rather, it explicitly states that the Reps have no one to be proud of. There are plenty of Dems who suck(ed). That's true of both parties. What's not true of one and is true of the other is prominent leaders with good reputations.
They don't have a recent one. The Dems have one recent one. It's not really a big difference.