Republicans: How Has Trump Made Your Life Better?

Republicans are probably enjoying all those new youtube videos of progressives crying their eyes out with despair at public protests.

I saw a clip of a snowflake on her knees screaming her lungs out at the heavens and another crying in despair sitting in a puddle of her piss.:rolleyes:
 
You're "asking for a friend", amiright?

No. The question is rhetorical. His firm either writes off the costs or they hire someone to collect it for them. If the former plaintiff (now "the defendant") truly cannot pay the costs because destitute, homeless, etc, the bill collector (Guido) doesn't get paid. And there's no insurance company to pay that bill.

What it comes down to is that Orfeo/Kirkrapine doesn't understand how the world works. He lives in a bubble and is constantly confused by the things that go on outside his protected little Gaia. Which is why he doesn't understand why socialism doesn't work. Or how most of the world buys, sells, and invoices for product/services. Or what happens when people can't pay their bills because the economy sucked under Obama.
 
I get it 'Rightguide' or whoever the hell you say you are (or not)...

You know your rightist side is the minority on this board and you wish to make yourself the self-appointed Knight of the alt-right voice, riding up on your horse, sticking it to those pesky libruls huh, because they have made your sour life a living hell. Amirite?

https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Purple111/v4/a7/a0/0f/a7a00f01-7ebe-cd06-275f-2b9d245cbbe1/pr_source.png/246x0w.png

Does your being a minority in the American public at large keep you from standing up for your point of view? We see you daily trotting in with your heels abusing the ribs of your Democrat mule to hee haw us to death with ineffectual arguments grounded in ignorance and angry racism. Must suck to be you.

You're wrong. I consider myself fortunate to live the life I'm living now.
 
...how has your life improved since november 2016?...

Are you kidding me?

Getting the U.S. out of the Paris climate "accord" (more accurately, the unconstitutional non-treaty) is a godsend for this country, its people and its economy.


The farce that is the Paris "accord" may have been the single stupidest thing this country ever did.






https://co2islife.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/climate_predictions.jpg


 
replies = 155 (as of 10/08/2018 @ 9:08am)
legit responses = 3

  • gofuckyourself's anecdote was dismissed due to her obvious lies
  • a veteran with a cool story about the va now working for him ;)
  • hispray with an iffy story about his business but it was as close as republicans got to a true answer.
  • trysail babbled about climate change :rolleyes: quell surprise.

not exactly the resounding vote of confidence i was hoping for :(
 

Are you kidding me?

Getting the U.S. out of the Paris climate "accord" (more accurately, the unconstitutional non-treaty) is a godsend for this country, its people and its economy.


The farce that is the Paris "accord" may have been the single stupidest thing this country ever did.






https://co2islife.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/climate_predictions.jpg



Only scientifically illiterate nimrods like trysail who get their information from propaganda sites are swayed by vapid cartoons like the above.
 
Only scientifically illiterate nimrods like trysail who get their information from propaganda sites are swayed by vapid cartoons like the above.

Have you noticed that as Tryfail's downward spiral steadily increases towards "terminal derplocity", the more the "wattsupwiththat" propaganda site is cited?

Not unlike end-stage AJ when every other post cut-n-pasted Von Mises claptrap.
 
Have you noticed that as Tryfail's downward spiral steadily increases towards "terminal derplocity", the more the "wattsupwiththat" propaganda site is cited?

Not unlike end-stage AJ when every other post cut-n-pasted Von Mises claptrap.

Only scientifically illiterate nimrods like trysail who get their information from propaganda sites are swayed by vapid cartoons like the above.

Copying and pasting without deeply examining the data or analyzing bias.
 
trysail, i reported you for spamming my thread with irrelevant off-gassing. :D
 
Copying and pasting without deeply examining the data or analyzing bias.


You mean like this?:



Audit Of The HadCrut4 Global Temperature Dataset by John McLean, Ph.D.



SUMMARY:
This report makes more than 70 findings about areas of concern with the HadCRUT4 temperature dataset. These cover the entire process from the measurement of temperatures to the derivation of HadCRUT4 global average temperature anomalies. They relate to the inclusion of data that is obviously in error, inappropriate procedures, poor data processing and significant assumptions about a range of matters including basing conclusions on very little data.

Most of the findings increase the uncertainty in the data and therefore increase the error margin. One however shows that a common but flawed method of data adjustment creates a false warming trend from the adjustments alone. Another finding points out that when stations were closed rather than relocated any distortion in the data remains in the record. Errors are also identified in sea surface temperatures, including some created by a member of the team responsible for that data.

Ultimately it is argued that the flawed data casts doubt on the credibility of IPCC reports that rely on HadCRUT4 data (or earlier versions of the dataset). Due diligence of these matters by governments twenty or more years ago might have avoided poorly-justified policies on climate and energy.



DATA USED:
As downloaded from CRU and Hadley Centre on 26 Jan 2018



https://robert-boyle-publishing.com...crut4-global-temperature-dataset-mclean-2018/



or did you mean like this?:




So, you think the historic global temperature records are reliable?

Here's how the temperature records for the ocean (remember, that's 70% of the earth's surface) were compiled.



ERI= Engine room intake
Bucket= (literally) throwing a canvas bucket overboard (I swear to god, I'm not making this up)

https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/figure-2.png
Source: Hadley Centre, Climate Research Unit
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadsst3/part_1_figinline.pdf



They haven't got a frickin' clue whether global temperatures are warmer or not.






 
replies = 155 (as of 10/08/2018 @ 9:08am)
legit responses = 3

  • gofuckyourself's anecdote was dismissed due to her obvious lies
  • a veteran with a cool story about the va now working for him ;)
  • hispray with an iffy story about his business but it was as close as republicans got to a true answer.
  • trysail babbled about climate change :rolleyes: quell surprise.

not exactly the resounding vote of confidence i was hoping for :(

The entire thread premise is a question about personal experiences describing how Trump made life better. If you can't accept the anecdotal evidence that was asked for, then GTFO.
 
What business are you in?

I'm a plaintiffs' personal injury lawyer, and payment is never a problem; when we win or settle a case, we get a check from an insurance company.


Oh, jeebus.

God help us, a genuine fucking ambulance chaser.

I should have known.




 

Oh, jeebus.

God help us, a genuine fucking ambulance chaser.

I should have known.





There is NOTHING WRONG with chasing ambulances. The problem is that sometimes the ambulance stops without warning. The number of casualties when that happens is staggering.

It makes a good living for those who chase the ambulance chasers. :D
 
Copying and pasting without deeply examining the data or analyzing bias.


...or did you mean like this:

Surface Stations

"...Published works by Dr. Roger Pielke of the University of Colorado, Dev Nyogi of Purdue University, and Georg Taylor of Oregon State University have demonstrated that a significant number of USHCN and other weather stations used in the climate record have some significant, and in some cases severe measurement biases near the thermometers in these climate stations of record. There have been instances recorded of air conditioners being located directly adjacent to the thermometer, vehicles parked next to thermometers head-in, heat generating electronics and electrical components being placed in the thermometer shelters within inches of the sensor, and sensors being located in the middle of large areas of asphalt/concrete and directly attached to buildings all in violation of standard published NOAA practices for temperature measurement. None of these things witnessed by observers and captured by photography are known or accounted for by climate researchers..."


https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/ushcn-surveyed-7-14-09.jpg
https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/crn_ratings.png


http://surfacestations.org/





 
And one scared chicken-shit OP, afraid to add a poll to decide the real results. He would rather pretend he is correct than face the truth. ;)

so i should start a poll .... about what exactly? and what do you think that i think that i am correct about? i know that you have a hard time communicating so please feel free to use pictures to illustrate your thoughts.
 
so i should start a poll .... about what exactly? and what do you think that i think that i am correct about? i know that you have a hard time communicating so please feel free to use pictures to illustrate your thoughts.

You know exactly what you are incorrect about having admitted it earlier, and verified it by refusing to allow any poll results to confirm your errors. You are the perfect example of the village idiot, oblivious to the reality around you.

You claim you are correct yet are not open to allowing everyone decide by a poll.

There have already been at least three other posters who have supported my case, while none have supported your case. Quite the opposite they strongly disagreed with you.

You are an absolute dummy and not worth any more of my time. Go on, gloat in your fantasy mind.
 
Good for you.


Tell me...

What happens when you don't win and the client can't pay the costs because they're unemployed?

We work on pure contingency fees; if we don't collect anything, the client owes us nothing, not even costs; if we do collect, we pocket a contractual percentage (33.3%, usually), plus costs, and remit the remainder to the client.
 
Or what happens when people can't pay their bills because the economy sucked under Obama.

Obama saved the economy from recession (insofar as Congress would allow -- the stimulus package needed to be twice as large as it was). The prosperity we now enjoy is Obama's doing, not Trump's.

A July 2018 paper, which used the synthetic control method, found no evidence that Trump had an impact on the US economy during his 18 months in office.[311]
 

You mean like this?:



Audit Of The HadCrut4 Global Temperature Dataset by John McLean, Ph.D.



SUMMARY:
This report makes more than 70 findings about areas of concern with the HadCRUT4 temperature dataset. These cover the entire process from the measurement of temperatures to the derivation of HadCRUT4 global average temperature anomalies. They relate to the inclusion of data that is obviously in error, inappropriate procedures, poor data processing and significant assumptions about a range of matters including basing conclusions on very little data.

Most of the findings increase the uncertainty in the data and therefore increase the error margin. One however shows that a common but flawed method of data adjustment creates a false warming trend from the adjustments alone. Another finding points out that when stations were closed rather than relocated any distortion in the data remains in the record. Errors are also identified in sea surface temperatures, including some created by a member of the team responsible for that data.

Ultimately it is argued that the flawed data casts doubt on the credibility of IPCC reports that rely on HadCRUT4 data (or earlier versions of the dataset). Due diligence of these matters by governments twenty or more years ago might have avoided poorly-justified policies on climate and energy.



DATA USED:
As downloaded from CRU and Hadley Centre on 26 Jan 2018



https://robert-boyle-publishing.com...crut4-global-temperature-dataset-mclean-2018/



or did you mean like this?:




So, you think the historic global temperature records are reliable?

Here's how the temperature records for the ocean (remember, that's 70% of the earth's surface) were compiled.



ERI= Engine room intake
Bucket= (literally) throwing a canvas bucket overboard (I swear to god, I'm not making this up)

https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/figure-2.png
Source: Hadley Centre, Climate Research Unit
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadsst3/part_1_figinline.pdf



They haven't got a frickin' clue whether global temperatures are warmer or not.







Oh, you mean climate science denier John McLean? All your propaganda links back to the same small set of deniers. Hell, even the surface station project you refer to is funded by Anthony Watts. :rolleyes:
 

Oh, jeebus.

God help us, a genuine fucking ambulance chaser.

I should have known.





Actually, the Bar rules don't allow that -- it's called barratry (one of four legal meanings of the term). You can't hang around in the emergency room and hand out business cards to patients, you can only contact a potential client after a specified number of days have passed since the accident.

It's different for criminal lawyers, because the Bar assumes that anyone who needs one, needs one immediately. Get arrested for anything and your mailbox will fill up with letters from lawyers, and that's perfectly ethical.
 
What it comes down to is that Orfeo/Kirkrapine doesn't understand how the world works. He lives in a bubble and is constantly confused by the things that go on outside his protected little Gaia. Which is why he doesn't understand why socialism doesn't work. Or how most of the world buys, sells, and invoices for product/services.

No PI lawyer lives in a bubble; it's a very hard, gritty, on-the-streets field of practice. In fact, the only lawyers who might live in a bubble are those whose work is purely intellectual, such as specialists in appellate practice.
 
Back
Top