RELIGION AND HOMOSEXUALITY: Tolerating Dr. Dobson

sweetnpetite

Intellectual snob
Joined
Jan 10, 2003
Posts
9,135
Feb. 9, 2004 -- Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family recently attacked SpongeBob SquarePants — and our own Declaration of Tolerance. Jennifer Smith-Holladay, director of Tolerance.org, asks, "Should Dobson be tolerated?"
By Jennifer Smith-Holladay | Director, Tolerance.org

Dr. James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, was recently quoted in the press claiming that children's cartoon character SpongeBob SquarePants was part of the "homosexual agenda."

The proof? SpongeBob appears in a new video for schools produced by the We Are Family Foundation, and the Foundation's website includes the Declaration of Tolerance, a pledge from Tolerance.org.

The Declaration states in part, "I pledge to have respect for people whose abilities, beliefs, culture, race, sexual identity or other characteristics are different from my own."

The "sexual identity" part alarmed Dr. Dobson.

It's the "beliefs" part that's hard for me.

Whose Gospel?
Focus on the Family's stated mission is to "cooperate with the Holy Spirit in disseminating the Gospel of Jesus Christ to as many people as possible, and, specifically, to accomplish that objective by helping to preserve traditional values and the institution of the family."

Yet, Focus on the Family often seems more intent on disseminating the anti-gay gospel than the Gospels of Jesus Christ (which, by the way, never once mention gay people).

Its anti-gay crusade kicked off in 1992, when Dobson used his highly popular radio show to turn Colorado's anti-gay Amendment 2 into a fundamentalist cause celebre. The anti-gay crusade continues:

Among the scores of anti-gay commentaries, stories and products on the Focus on the Family website is a Dobson essay that strikes a typical note: "Moms and Dads, are you listening? This [gay] movement is the greatest threat to your children. It is of particular danger to your wide-eyed boys, who have no idea what demoralization is planned for them."

Dobson spearheaded the successful national campaign against gay marriage in 2003 and 2004.
Even Christian conservative C. Everett Koop, President Reagan's surgeon general, has called Dobson "homophobic."
So how then do I muster respect, tolerance even, for Dr. Dobson when he constantly maligns my gay brothers and sisters and engages in shameful amounts of fear mongering? How do I respect a man whose beliefs so often contradict my own?

The key to tolerating Dobson may lie somewhere within our democracy's principles. I believe in Dr. Dobson's right to hold and express his beliefs; freedoms of religion and expression are core tenets of our democracy. I also believe that our democracy allows for both Dr. Dobson and a child with two moms.

Things get tough after that though, since Dobson actively seeks to limit the rights and freedoms of others. Worse, I suspect he wants our democracy to resemble a Christian theocracy.

I don't have an easy answer. The one thing I do know: When I sign the Tolerance Pledge today, I'll be thinking of Dr. Dobson and paying special attention to the line that says, "I will examine my own biases and work to overcome them."

http://www.tolerance.org/news/article_tol.jsp?id=1157

---A few months ago, I was talking about if we should or shouldn't tollerate intollerance. Well, I found this article which I figured I'd toss out there. --Sweet.
 
Last edited:
sweetnpetite said:
Feb. 9, 2004 -- Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family recently attacked SpongeBob SquarePants — and our own Declaration of Tolerance. Jennifer Smith-Holladay, director of Tolerance.org, asks, "Should Dobson be tolerated?"
By Jennifer Smith-Holladay | Director, Tolerance.org


Whose Gospel?
Focus on the Family's stated mission is to "cooperate with the Holy Spirit in disseminating the Gospel of Jesus Christ to as many people as possible, and, specifically, to accomplish that objective by helping to preserve traditional values and the institution of the family."

WHose Gospel? WHy, his, of course. Y'know, the right one.

:rolleyes:

Q_C
 
We do have to tolerate the man, and I use the term 'man' loosely.

We do not have to listen to him. And we do have to oppose him with our own words and actions at every turn.

I'm afraid I can't help but wonder how tightly closeted Dr. Dobson is. Several of the worst underminers of the Constitution were closeted so tight, their balls must have ached all the time.

J. Edgar Hoover is the first that comes to mind.

Roy Cohn, the brains behind Joseph McCarthy is another.

And Terry Dolan, the founder of NCPAC (New Conservative Political Action Committee) is yet a third. This man is probably most directly responsible for the current state of politics in the U.S.

Not sure what relationship there is between denying your sexuality and willingness to destroy the goodness of your country, but there seems to be a link, in my mind.
 
Damnit. I caught the thread title out of the corner of my eye and thought it said "Belegon and Homosexuality."

Way to get my hopes up.

(Edited to add: )

Oh, and I liked the "especially your wide-eyed boys" line. I'm not sure what's more disturbing, the implicit Victorian assumption that women are sexually passive receptors who won't get up to any trouble on their own, or the fact that Dobson seems to have this powerful mental image of wide-eyed young boys, and possibly the acts that made their eyes widen.

Shanglan
 
Last edited:
BlackShanglan said:
Damnit. I caught the thread title out of the corner of my eye and thought it said "Belegon and Homosexuality."

Way to get my hopes up.

Shanglan


LOL,

I made the same mis read horsey :)
 
BlackShanglan said:
Damnit. I caught the thread title out of the corner of my eye and thought it said "Belegon and Homosexuality."

Way to get my hopes up.

(Edited to add: )

Oh, and I liked the "especially your wide-eyed boys" line. I'm not sure what's more disturbing, the implicit Victorian assumption that women are sexually passive receptors who won't get up to any trouble on their own, or the fact that Dobson seems to have this powerful mental image of wide-eyed young boys, and possibly the acts that made their eyes widen.

Shanglan
I know. I saw that and I immediately leapt at the conclusion that Dr. D had been approached NAMBLA-style, and been scared witless by the experience, when he was a wide-eyed young boy. He slipped there, unless it's all just callous fear-mongering. The phrase will certainly work, and he could be just casually throwing it in for effect, I suppose.
 
Back
Top