Proposed Literotica zoning law, interested men should check in.

KillerMuffin

Seraphically Disinclined
Joined
Jul 29, 2000
Posts
25,603
Welcome to the Literotica Planning Board meeting, ladies and gentlemen. Today we are beginning exploratory option on the proposed zoning law LGB-112054. All comments for or against are welcome, thought the Board would appreciate it if we kept the comments to the subject and clean for our more delicate audience members.

LGB-112054 is a proposed zoning law that affects roughly half the populace of the Literotica community. Our fact-finding mission is to establish whether or not this proposal will benefit the community or harm it.

The proposal writer isn't here with us today, though I understand he will be around later on this evening if there are any questions concerning the drafting of this proposal. Please see Problem Child or PM him if there are any questions that must be dealt with prior to suggestion.

All right, if we can move right along here, the language of the proposal is very simple. It affects the Literotica General Board, platted GB-4, in its entirety. All persons residing or conducting business in this zone will be required to conform to this regulation should it be enacted as law. Specifically, all male persons will be required to conform to this regulation. The length covered by this proposal is not less than 100 years where a new discussion will be scheduled to discuss the merits of repeal or renewal. At that time, the law will remain in effect should the scheduled discussino fail to happen. As a statute, the law would require a space no less than 3 feet from the central location, heretoafter referred to as the "cock," of one male to the "cock" of another. Additionally, the "cock" of one male must remain out of the line of sight of another male at all times. This is the personal comfort addendum that has been modified to ensure that unwanted sightings do not happen. The stipulation that the "cock" of a male that is being utilized within any orifice of a female is free from the unwanted sighting addendum as the eyes of other males will not be affected by such viewings.

The drafted proposal, LGB-112054 is commonly referred to as the "3 foot no-cock zone."

Assuming no argument, this proposal is due to be sent from committee to legislative chambers in one week, November 27, 2001 at 8 a.m. pacific standard time.

The floor is now open for discussion.
 
I tend to zone out on the boring parts and go right to the heart

....blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah ah blah blah blah blah blah blah blablah blah blah blah blah blah blahh blah blah blah "3 foot no-cock zone."

blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
 
does this mean Killer Muffin needs 3 feet of cock to pe pleasured at all times?
 
Now, now. This is a personal security proposal. It's designed to help the men of this site maintain their comfort levels. It guarantees that they won't be exposed to unwanted cock and that their cocks won't get within three feet of another man's cock.

I was under the impression that a man consider another man's cock to be pretty much a "HELL FUCKING NO!!!!!!" kind of thing.
 
I've been to gay sites. I'm well aware of what goes on in the men's locker room. I must say I'm shocked that you've participated. And so blithely, too. I can see the 3 foot no cock zone isn't a big thing for you.
 
KillerMuffin said:
I was under the impression that a man consider another man's cock to be pretty much a "HELL FUCKING NO!!!!!!" kind of thing.

Silly Muffin, trix are for kids.
 
KM, I'd appreciate being credited with the concept of the 3 foot "no-cock zone" that you have misattributed to PC. I am the real homophobe around here. I'd also like to say that there's no reason to be closer than 3 feet from another cock even in a locker room.

Thank you.
 
This proposal is UN-AMERICAN!

Are you telling me that you're attempting to legislate quarterbacks only operating from the shotgun? What do you think we want to become, Detroit Lions fans? (Gratuitous humor inserted for STP's sake). And just think how long the counter line at McDonald's would be if you enforced a 3' radius in all directions (though I confess I scoot closer to pretty women ;).

I would expect this kind of social engineering from Marxist, but YOU KM! I'm SHOCKED, SHOCKED!
 
Re: This proposal is UN-AMERICAN!

Pan718 said:
Are you telling me that you're attempting to legislate quarterbacks only operating from the shotgun? What do you think we want to become, Detroit Lions fans? (Gratuitous humor inserted for STP's sake). And just think how long the counter line at McDonald's would be if you enforced a 3' radius in all directions (though I confess I scoot closer to pretty women ;).

I would expect this kind of social engineering from Marxist, but YOU KM! I'm SHOCKED, SHOCKED!

What? Point to a thread where I social engineered. OK, I did post a map with all of the dissenters of the world in a wad but that's not what you meant.

I'm an asshole, but please attribute attitudes correctly.
 
Wink

Gosh, Marxist... Please don't make me check my facts. I couldn't accurately tell you the attitude I write with in half of my posts. Next thing people will expect my spontaneous tongue in cheek responses to actually be witty.... The pressure would turn me into a veg.

(Although that might initiate a relationship with NekkidHickGurl?)
 
Last edited:
Re: This proposal is UN-AMERICAN!

Pan718 said:
Are you telling me that you're attempting to legislate quarterbacks only operating from the shotgun? What do you think we want to become, Detroit Lions fans? (Gratuitous humor inserted for STP's sake). And just think how long the counter line at McDonald's would be if you enforced a 3' radius in all directions (though I confess I scoot closer to pretty women ;).

I would expect this kind of social engineering from Marxist, but YOU KM! I'm SHOCKED, SHOCKED!

I agree the NFL is sacred, changes of this type would ruin the game. Not to mention the effect it would have on the WWF!:eek: :eek:
 
no can do

Sorry, the proposed ordinance would render the use of urinals problematic, forcing men to rely only on every other one due to current spacing. I don't think I need to point out that you don't want to enact a zoning change that lessens the probability of actually using the plumbing - do I?

I'm not one who feels strongly about this otherwise, I did some modeling and got comfortable with my own self, if anybody else is uncomfortable he can just impose his own zone.
 
no problem here.

as long as they don't bother me with it i could not care less what other males do with their cocks.
 
Under no circumstances am I giving up circle jerks and the blowjobs I have come to expect. I vote an emphatic no to whatever this zoning thing is.
 
modest mouse said:
Under no circumstances am I giving up circle jerks and the blowjobs I have come to expect.
So you have circle jerks and blowjobs aplenty, but boob dances are a rarity up there in Vermont? We really need to get you some females in those parts.
 
Mischka said:
So you have circle jerks and blowjobs aplenty, but boob dances are a rarity up there in Vermont? We really need to get you some females in those parts.

We's got cows. Sum arr purty ya know.
 
Back
Top