Progressive???

[Kantarii]

From the Urban Dictionary:

Butthurt Liberal:

A liberal that feels victimized when something doesn't go their way. Often comes with the feeling that anything that doesn't reflect their world view has some unfair bias against them. Almost all liberals fall into the category of "butthurt liberal" due in large part to their inherent weaknesses: mental retardation and being vaginas about everything.

Only a Butthurt Liberal would use a website like urban dictionary to slander people they don't agree with.

 

[Emerson40]

Anyone notice that he still hasn't disputed any of the items in the OP?

That’s because I’m still laughing at the absurdity of the source, laughter which has only been compounded by your posts, and the replies in the thread.

And who’s looking to dispute a silly, user-submitted joke definition of progressives, anyway? That’d be about as constructive as disputing a busybody post. Who’s got time to waste on that? Lighten up, Francis.

I may have to step away for a spell, before I get a serious cramp from laughing so hard at all this nonsense.

 

[Conager]

From the Urban Dictionary:

Butthurt Liberal:

A liberal that feels victimized when something doesn't go their way. Often comes with the feeling that anything that doesn't reflect their world view has some unfair bias against them. Almost all liberals fall into the category of "butthurt liberal" due in large part to their inherent weaknesses: mental retardation and being vaginas about everything.

Only a Butthurt Liberal would use a website like urban dictionary to slander people they don't agree with.

I especially liked the triggering potential of that last sentence with its blithe lack of self-awareness, or more likely, deliberate provocation.

 

[Kantarii]

That’s because I’m still laughing at the absurdity of the source, laughter which has only been compounded by your posts, and the replies in the thread.

And who’s looking to dispute a silly, user-submitted joke definition of progressives, anyway? That’d be about as constructive as disputing a busybody post. Who’s got time to waste on that? Lighten up, Francis.

I may have to step away for a spell, before I get a serious cramp from laughing so hard at all this nonsense.

Would you like to give us a more in-depth definition of Butt hurt Liberal or refute some of the things about the definition of “Progressive”? You choose.

 

[Conager]

That’s because I’m still laughing at the absurdity of the source, laughter which has only been compounded by your posts, and the replies in the thread.

And who’s looking to dispute a silly, user-submitted joke definition of progressives, anyway? That’d be about as constructive as disputing a busybody post. Who’s got time to waste on that? Lighten up, Francis.

I may have to step away for a spell, before I get a serious cramp from laughing so hard at all this nonsense.

Wait.

You are laughing because progressives are a joke or because you actually think that fairly accurate description of a stereotypical progressive is a joke and inaccurate?

I thought it was dead nuts* on. I wouldn't even go so far as to accuse it of hyperbolic amplitude. The bit about why progressives have so labeled themselves, and the history of various labels that they've applied to themselves and rejected over the years very much mirrors statements I've made here on that very subject.

(Legumes would be a acceptable along with tree nuts.)

 

[Kantarii]

Wait.

You are laughing because progressives are a joke or because you actually think that fairly accurate description of a stereotypical progressive is a joke and inaccurate?

I thought it was dead nuts* on. I wouldn't even go so far as to accuse it of hyperbolic amplitude.

(Legumes would be a acceptable along with tree nuts.)

Is he making a weak attempt to deflect?

 

[Conager]

Is he making a weak attempt to deflect?

Progressives are pretty humorless lot so anytime they're "laughing" that is a pretty good indication that they're actually not laughing and looking to deflect and minimize the appearance of butt hurt.

 

[Kantarii]

Progressives are pretty humorless lot so anytime they're "laughing" that is a pretty good indication that they're actually not laughing and looking to deflect and minimize the appearance of butt hurt.

I think the Urban Dictionary has Emerson accurately defined. He’s certainly not trying to refute the definitions on either account.

 

[Emerson40]

I just knew the two of you would get along like a house on fire.


Birds of a feather...

 

[Kantarii]

Yup.. He’s butt hurt for sure now. Look at him go proving the definition true instead of refuting it.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I just knew the two of you would get along like a house on fire.


Birds of a feather...

Two patriotic liberal (actual liberty loving liberals, not socialist posers) American veterans?

Yea. Birds of a feather.

Yup.. He’s butt hurt for sure now. Look at him go proving the definition true instead of refuting it.

They never refute it, they rarely ever try to deny it because that never works out very well.

Lefty: "Abolish ICE/DHS/CBP!!! Close concentration camps and decriminalize undocumented entry!! No more deporting undocumented citizens!!"

Everyone else: So you wan't open borders......

Lefty: I NEVER said that!!!

Everyone else: so then you want secured borders and enforced immigration laws??

Lefty: I NEVER said that either you fucking NAZI!!!!

 

[Conager]

I just knew the two of you would get along like a house on fire.


Birds of a feather...

You and Hashtag were always thick as thieves.

 

[Kantarii]

Anyone notice that he still hasn't disputed any of the items in the OP?

Nor has anyone else attempted to refute the definition either.

 

[Conager]

Every pundant on the right and the left has said that the Democrats cannot simply be the anti Trump party. They have to stand for something specific. Preferably something positive something that they are going to offer the country. The problem is anything that they want to do is going to harm the economy not help it and they know it.

So they're gambling on being the anti Trump party.

 

[Kantarii]

Lefty: I NEVER said that either you fucking NAZI!!!!

Listen to them long enough and they will try to convince you that half the population in America is Nazis out to get them.

No, it’s just the fact we don’t share their batshit crazy pipe dreams.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Listen to them long enough and they will try to convince you that half the population in America is Nazis out to get them.

No, it’s just the fact we don’t share their batshit crazy pipe dreams.

It's the most insane shit ever.

Not a woke socialist? NAZI!!!!

No love for liberty?? I thought you were a fan.

 

[Emerson40]

You and Hashtag were always thick as thieves.

Ooch! Sick burn, que. I might never recover from that one.



But, haven’t you heard, Kunthairy is the new hashtag.


Same comprehension abilities and hunger for attention, and just look at him not giving a fuck, all throughout this thread.

 

[Kantarii]

Every pundant on the right and the left has said that the Democrats cannot simply be the anti Trump party. They have to stand for something specific. Preferably something positive something that they are going to offer the country. The problem is anything that they want to do is going to harm the economy not help it and they know it.

So they're gambling on being the anti Trump party.

Here’s a nice article you might find interesting:

Dems want to copy Europe and print more money.

https://apple.news/AMgUfu1mfR2-nyjFUSNmDFw
What do you mean we can't afford Medicare for All or the Green New Deal? Why not just print the trillions of dollars we need? Why not?

—————
What they’re offering is BS, not something a number of us don’t want.

 

[Kantarii]

Ooch! Sick burn, que. I might never recover from that one.



But, haven’t you heard, Kunthairy is the new hashtag.


Same comprehension abilities and hunger for attention, and just look at him not giving a fuck, all throughout this thread.

Damn, dude. You swallowed the bait hook, line and sinker.

So let’s set the hook and reel you in.

Why are you dodging and not trying to refute the Urban Dictionary definition of progressive?

 

[Conager]

Ooch! Sick burn, que. I might never recover from that one.



But, haven’t you heard, Kunthairy is the new hashtag.


Same comprehension abilities and hunger for attention, and just look at him not giving a fuck, all throughout this thread.

That is what this is about? You can't get a rise out of hashtag anymore so you are seeking approval by trolling elsewhere?

 

[cowslinger64]

Every pundant on the right and the left has said that the Democrats cannot simply be the anti Trump party. They have to stand for something specific. Preferably something positive something that they are going to offer the country. The problem is anything that they want to do is going to harm the economy not help it and they know it.

So they're gambling on being the anti Trump party.

Being the anti-Hilary party and the I'm not OBAMA!! party worked for the last idiot you people elected.

Pretty much goes for the next election, it couldn't get worse than the orange trainwreck, the views of you ball lickers, notwithstanding.

 

[Emerson40]

That is what this is about? You can't get a rise out of hashtag anymore so you are seeking approval by trolling elsewhere?

I replied in a thread, commenting about a silly source in the OP. That’s trolling?

The rest of it is... well, you’ll say it’s whatever fits your narrative. Have at it. Posts are there for all to read.



Entertainment, well worth the price of admission.

 

[Conager]

I replied in a thread, commenting about a silly source in the OP. That’s trolling?

The rest of it is... well, you’ll say it’s whatever fits your narrative. Have at it. Posts are there for all to read.



Entertainment, well worth the price of admission.

There's that fake laughter, covering the Liberal Butt Hurt again.

To repeat, why question the attribution when you have nothing specific you disagree with? He attributed the source because he wanted to give credit for the accurate description of a stereotypical progressive, not because one expects to find such insight on UD.

 

[Conager]

Being the anti-Hilary party and the I'm not OBAMA!! party worked for the last idiot you people elected.

Pretty much goes for the next election, it couldn't get worse than the orange trainwreck, the views of you ball lickers, notwithstanding.

Go help someone hand you the appropriate talking points about the last election so that you don't sounds like such a blithering idiot.

Trump did not run on not being Hillary. He ran on trade, immigration, healthcare, jobs, economic policies, cronyism, and anti-corruption.

Hillary did run on being a continuation of the Obama administration. Voters that matter rejected a third term for Obama's policies.

 

[Emerson40]

There's that fake laughter, covering the Liberal Butt Hurt again.

To repeat, why question the attribution when you have nothing specific you disagree with? He attributed the source because he wanted to give credit for the accurate description of a stereotypical progressive, not because one expects to find such insight on UD.

Yeah, yeah, I get it que. You’ve already said source is irrelevant, provided the description / definition matches the narrative you want.


Explains a great deal about you and your position, actually.


*more fake laughter*