Different ends of the political spectrum coming together in love.

Ww2f

Virgin
Joined
Aug 8, 2021
Posts
11
This election year the nation is more divisive more than ever, domestic and foreign issues distancing each end far more than ever..
Red and blue hearts molding in to Purple.
Stories centered around a conservative and a progressive falling in love each other.

Stories like Purple Hearts(2022),
IMDB excerpt
Two young people, Cassie Salazar and Luke Morrow, have been taught to despise each other because of their different political identities - one progressive and one conservative. Then urgent circumstances (financial desperation) cause them to create a joint enterprise (a marriage of convenience), and they gradually learn that their political identities are not so important when the world throws a variety of challenges at them. Much more important are their personal qualities, such as empathy, integrity, consideration, loyalty, and fairness. Perhaps they can even learn to flourish in a marriage of convenience.


Story ideas:-

Bridging the Divide

In a world torn by ideological strife, where politics dictate not just policies but personal identities, two individuals find themselves on opposite ends of the spectrum.

On one side is Alex, a passionate activist known for their fiery speeches advocating for social justice and progressive change. Alex grew up in a family deeply committed to causes of equality and fairness, and their worldview is shaped by personal experiences of overcoming adversity.

On the other side is Emily, a staunch advocate for traditional values and conservative principles. Emily comes from a background of privilege, where stability and order were cherished above all else. Her beliefs are rooted in a strong sense of duty to preserve what she perceives as the foundations of society.

Their paths cross unexpectedly at a community event where both are invited to speak, representing their respective viewpoints. Initially, sparks fly – not of romance, but of passionate debate. Each sees the other as the embodiment of everything wrong with society's values.

Despite their differences, fate keeps bringing them together. They find themselves collaborating on a community project aimed at bridging divides between different socioeconomic groups. Forced to work closely, they begin to see beyond the stereotypes they've built of each other.

Slowly, Alex discovers that Emily's conservatism isn't rooted in ignorance but in a desire to protect what she holds dear. Likewise, Emily sees that Alex's progressivism stems from genuine compassion and a drive to uplift the marginalized.

As they spend more time together, their initial animosity turns into respect and admiration. They learn to challenge each other's beliefs without invalidating their own convictions. Conversations that once ended in heated arguments now lead to thoughtful reflections and understanding.

Amidst the chaos of their conflicting worlds, Alex and Emily find solace in each other's company. They realize that love doesn't need to erase differences but can thrive because of them. Their relationship becomes a beacon of hope in a society increasingly divided by ideology.

However, their journey is not without challenges. They face skepticism and backlash from friends, family, and even their own communities who view their relationship as a betrayal of their principles. Yet, Alex and Emily remain steadfast, believing that their love can be a catalyst for greater empathy and unity.

In the end, Bridging the Divide is not just a love story but a testament to the power of understanding and compassion in overcoming the deepest of divides – ideological, societal, and personal.


Across the Aisle
Characters:

  1. Elena: A passionate activist for environmental causes and social justice. She organizes protests, writes compelling op-eds, and believes in systemic change through grassroots movements. Elena comes from a family of activists and grew up in a community that values progressivism above all else.
  2. James: A conservative political analyst working for a prominent news network. He is articulate, logical, and believes in traditional values, fiscal responsibility, and a strong national defense. James comes from a wealthy family with deep ties to the political establishment and has always been groomed for a career in politics.
Storyline:

Elena and James first cross paths during a heated town hall debate about climate change and economic policy. Sparks fly not just from their opposing viewpoints but also from their mutual respect for each other's intelligence and passion. Despite their ideological differences, they find themselves drawn to each other.

As they continue to encounter each other at various events and protests, they begin to engage in private conversations that go beyond politics. They discover shared interests in literature, music, and even obscure hobbies like bird watching. These moments of connection challenge their preconceived notions about each other's beliefs and backgrounds.

Their relationship faces significant hurdles as their friends and families question their compatibility. Elena's activist friends see James as a symbol of everything they fight against, while James' conservative circle views Elena as a threat to their values. The pressure from both sides intensifies as Elena and James navigate their growing feelings for each other.

Ultimately, Elena and James must decide whether their love can transcend their political differences. They embark on a journey of introspection, confronting their own biases and assumptions about the "other side." Through their relationship, they learn that understanding and empathy can bridge even the deepest divides.


If anyone wants to make this into an story contest, please be my guest.
 

To that end, we DO NOT publish works of any type featuring the following content:

.
.
.
.


Works that promote or focus heavily on politics or religion, or political or religious figures. Lit readers are bombarded with political disputes on other platforms and they prefer to avoid these types of divisive issues in their erotica.


.
.
.


https://www.literotica.com/resources/content-guidelines
 
To that end, we DO NOT publish works of any type featuring the following content:

.
.
.
.


Works that promote or focus heavily on politics or religion, or political or religious figures. Lit readers are bombarded with political disputes on other platforms and they prefer to avoid these types of divisive issues in their erotica.


.
.
.


https://www.literotica.com/resources/content-guidelines
How can I modify my post to ensure it complies with Literotica's Content Guidelines?

My intention was not to incite such situations. I simply wish to suggest that the specific setting and backdrop offer a rich opportunity to explore the "enemies to lovers" trope in literary works.
 
How can I modify my post to ensure it complies with Literotica's Content Guidelines?

My intention was not to incite such situations. I simply wish to suggest that the specific setting and backdrop offer a rich opportunity to explore the "enemies to lovers" trope in literary works.

I don't think that JAf0 is suggesting you change your post. I think he's letting you know the story might not be publishable here on Lit. It might be worth bouncing off @Laurel and see what she thinks.
 
I have an idea of a post-apocalyptic story where a right-wing militia and socialistic hippie commune band together against the wasteland monstrosities. Repopulation ensues.

I had originally considered accentuating the political differences between my characters in Jumping GI Jane (Walmart Republican Ohio rube vs Limousine Liberal Massachusetts snob) before deciding it would be more interesting to have them both as apolitical (dyspolitical?) cynics and thus accentuate the class differences instead.
 
I don't think that JAf0 is suggesting you change your post. I think he's letting you know the story might not be publishable here on Lit. It might be worth bouncing off @Laurel and see what she thinks.
Thank you for the suggestion. I have let @Laurel know about the situation. Should I contact Moderator: @sirhugs as well?

It is my firm belief that authors can weaving story lines and mold characters without reader subjected to a bombarding of politcal ideas.

Like the conversation about religion between Amanda and Auston in The Oddest of Set-ups by Frankenstein1962 (Forum- @Frankenstein1962).
It is a great story with engaging plot and interesting characters. One of the best work by Frankenstein1962.
 
The dynamics of political opposition can be discussed. I think what they want you to stay away from is any real-life political issues. So someone else's suggestion of "strangereal" seemed on point.

I took that to imply something like the politics of a world which isn't our own, which of course would have fictional issues that wouldn't provoke real-world partisans.
 
Super easy rule to get around. Change the names of everything to a Strangereal sort of way. Did that for my Intern Intrigue story.
Great idea. That premise will grant more freedom to writers with the narrative and world building.

I'm intrigued by exploring how authors' life experiences, ideas, and values shape their interpretations of the world in their stories, as well as how they craft characters and depict their interactions with the world. However, I wonder if an alternate universe setting might create some distance from these real-world connections.
 
A James Carville -- Mary Matalin fan fiction.
Exactly... my friend!

If they can maintain a marriage for over 30 years,
Surely we can create stories inspired by their real-life experiences without descending into political arguments.
 
Back
Top