Progressive NIMBYs

SpeareChucker

Literotica Guru
Joined
Oct 27, 2017
Posts
24,614
Let them live in the streets where they belong!

We need to think property values here people.


Rich San Francisco residents in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s congressional district have collected more than $60,000 after starting an online crowdsourcing campaign to wage a legal challenge against a proposed center for the city's homeless.

The campaign, called “Safe Embarcadero for All,” was launched March 20 after San Francisco Mayor London Breed proposed a 200-bed homeless Navigation Center in the city’s most desirable location, the Embarcadero along the coast of San Francisco Bay, earlier this month.

“The planned location for Mayor Breed's #megashelter is home to thousands of families, visited by millions of tourists and at the center of some of San Francisco's most iconic events - including the San Francisco Marathon, San Francisco Giants stadium and on one of the busiest bicyclist paths in the city,” reads the site posted by the group opposing the construction.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sa...s-shelter-as-city-struggles-with-homelessness
 
If only poor people would just...go away.

Then we wouldn't have to look at them anymore...

and when we don't see them, we don't have to think about them.
 

Tenants abide by the terms of the lease that the landlord sets, Miles. They're not negotiable. I realize you feel rules and laws are merely "advisory in nature", that explains why you, Ish, AJ and vetty all got banhammered...and i'm still standing.

Also, your three daughters should die in a fire.

Pulsa DiNura for you and yours.
 
... and Democrats wonder how Hillary could have lost since they are so appealing to rational people unlike the deplorables that they love to hate.


Throbbie has always thought that belittling others increases his stature.
It's an illness shared by so many who identify with the label Democrat voter

(especially those moderates who claim to vote issues/person but just cannot bring themselves to vote for a Republican because they are bad people on the wrong side of every issue).
 
... and Democrats wonder how Hillary could have lost since they are so appealing to rational people unlike the deplorables that they love to hate.


Throbbie has always thought that belittling others increases his stature.
It's an illness shared by so many who identify with the label Democrat voter

(especially those moderates who claim to vote issues/person but just cannot bring themselves to vote for a Republican because they are bad people on the wrong side of every issue).

...and you wonder how obama won. twice :cool:

And look at them rush in to prove me right.


Life is good.


;)

prove you right, nimby? you posted a link, it's not like you had an original thought :eek:
 
You see, once again, when the topic is uncomfortably close to home, the true Progressive lashes out.


Trump won because of Progressive lashing out and those people who they lashed out at voted for him (see post #7). That is far different than people voting for Obama to get past the stigma of Racism.
 
Saint Peter
This message is hidden because Saint Peter is on your ignore list.

Im sure Mr. Bumpersticker had something short, shallow and, in his mind, pithy* to add to the conversation.




* and no, I'm not attacking his sexuality or mannerisms (they thpeak for themselves...)
 
You see, once again, when the topic is uncomfortably close to home, the true Progressive lashes out.


Trump won because of Progressive lashing out and those people who they lashed out at voted for him (see post #7). That is far different than people voting for Obama to get past the stigma of Racism.

by that flawed logic, hillary should have won because woman.

this isn't going well for you, nimby :(
 
This is a sanctuary city where the homeless are shitting in the historically picturesque city where the streets are now covered in garbage and needles, where only the most upper-crust can afford to live and they don't want to do a gawd-damned thing to relieve the suffering of the homeless because housing them might bring down the value of their adjacent properties.
 
by that flawed logic, hillary should have won because woman.

this isn't going well for you, nimby :(

Hillary could have won because of woman and she thought she was going to win because of woman and this led her to besmirch, belittle and ignore.

Campaign stops in just two of the deplorable states was all she had to do, but that would have pissed off the base she chose to pander to. She is such a horrible person that no one was really motivated to vote for her to prove they weren't misogynists, even women and minorities.

But what does any of that have to do with the plight of the homeless?

Are they homeless in San Fransisco only because Trump was elected as the 'not Hillary' candidate? Is the reason for a homeless shelter not being built Trump? Does Trump own a huge chunk of real estate in that neighborhood?
 
Now enlighten me.


How am I a NIMBY? Sounds like a real serious charge. You must have some sort of proof...
 
bringing up san francisco and double posting means you're rattled. :cool: you should be. this conversation went bad to worse for you in a hurry :D
 
lol



Rattled. Is that some sort of euphemism of the day for the worn-out 'triggered?'

Or is changing the subject and not addressing the topic the only form of argument such a brilliant thinker such as yourself can engage in? I see why Throb does it; he's just not as smart as you, so he has to resort to potty mouth...
 
lol



Rattled. Is that some sort of euphemism of the day for the worn-out 'triggered?'

Or is changing the subject and not addressing the topic the only form of argument such a brilliant thinker such as yourself can engage in? I see why Throb does it; he's just not as smart as you, so he has to resort to potty mouth...

give it up, cap'n. :)
 
Back
Top