Prescription for a revolt.

Authoritarian oppression from "progressive" (D)ictators and (D)espots on power trips resulting in a revolt.

But, you don't have any revolutionary agenda -- except, in your case, decentralization, and that ain't gonna fly.
 
But, you don't have any revolutionary agenda -- except, in your case, decentralization, and that ain't gonna fly.

Taking out any despotic and illegal tyrants on an illegal power trip should they demonstrably become so.

What other agenda is needed??

Why wouldn't it fly?? It's done so many times in the past.
 
Stop with the bullshit. They are trying to expand the government to levels unseen in our history and completely change the relationship between citizen and government.

Biden's agenda is a complete Socialist take over of the country's economy and social programs.

There is nothing in it that has not been done before, and worked out well enough. Federal funding of infrastructure? Goes back to the Whigs. Election reform? The Voting Rights Act was constitutional. There isn't even single-payer health care in the present agenda. It's not even social-democratic.

His plan is to expedite an invasion of the country by foreign nationals . . .

Immigration =/= invasion.

Type that 100 times.

. . .he plans to influence economically in order to dilute and eventually dispossess the American voting majority, so as to facilitate dragging the country into totalitarian socialism.

His administration is proposing a total amnesty and citizenship for all illegal aliens who have entered the US since the 70s. This amnesty will include voting rights and huge monetary awards designed to buy their voting allegiance. Democrats are the most dangerous and destructive force in America today. Americans realize this and are poised to put a stop to it.

:rolleyes: Will you drop that preposterous canard once and for all?! The Dems are not trying to import Dem voters.
 
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71EWZpN+kiL._AC_SL1024_.jpg

I mean you are always calling liberals who support civil rights fascist......like most comrades who hate liberty and lover authority. :D

Ah, my favorite President. He is my neighbor right down the street. I visit his house here often. The crossing is right up the road.

Yes, Washington is a great figure and a great example of a liberal of his day....though he was flawed. He owned slaves so he wouldn't qualify as a liberal for today's times. Liberals today embrace equality , social and civil rights so he would be disqualified due to the slaves he owned.

And I still do consider him a great example of a great man and founder of our country.
 
Ah, my favorite President. He is my neighbor right down the street. I visit his house here often. The crossing is right up the road.

Yes, Washington is a great figure and a great example of a liberal of his day....though he was flawed. He owned slaves so he wouldn't qualify as a liberal for today's times. Liberals today embrace equality , social and civil rights so he would be disqualified due to the slaves he owned.

And I still do consider him a great example of a great man and founder of our country.

"I am an aristocrat. I love liberty, I hate equality."

-- John Randolph of Roanoke
 
Washington was descended from and related to, Britsih Aristocracy.

But why are you even considering taking down Jefferson's statue?
 
Ah, my favorite President. He is my neighbor right down the street. I visit his house here often. The crossing is right up the road.

A fascist revolutionary and alt-reich Nazi by your standards.

Yes, Washington is a great figure and a great example of a liberal of his day....though he was flawed. He owned slaves so he wouldn't qualify as a liberal for today's times. ​Liberals today embrace equality , social and civil rights so he would be disqualified due to the slaves he owned.

Yes liberals embrace equality.... not EQUITY.

They also embrace civil rights.

This is why you and the other equality and civil rights loathing leftist (D)'eez/ "progressives" are NOT liberals. :D
 
Taking out any despotic and illegal tyrants on an illegal power trip should they demonstrably become so.

What other agenda is needed??

Why wouldn't it fly?? It's done so many times in the past.

Because revolutions are sometimes worth having but always risky. Even when the revolutionaries can be sure of winning, they can never be sure of what comes next. You take the Oath of the Tennis Court, and next thing you know Napoleon is Emperor -- is this what we had in mind?!

The danger is that much higher when you start a revolution with no clear idea of what comes next, and the only thing you have in mind is overturning the status quo.

This was the problem the 1960s New Left had.

The New Left not only have no blueprint, they don’t want a blueprint. Let’s just see what happens, they say. Well, I can tell them what will happen: first anarchy, then dictatorship. They are rich in Tom Paines, but they have no Thomas Jefferson.

—Gore Vidal[1]
 
Last edited:
Because revolutions are sometimes worth having but always risky. Even when the revolutionaries can be sure of winning, they can never be sure of what comes next.

I never said it was without risk... I don't think anyone did.

Yell at some clouds some more why don't you. :D

The danger is that much higher when you start a revolution with no clear idea of what comes next, and the only thing you have in mind is overturning the status quo.

In my case it would be to return to the Constitution that the hypothetical abusive and illegal government was no longer adhering to.

This was the problem the 1960s New Left had.

That's the problem the current left has LOL

Ya'll are the revolutionaries trying to overturn the status quo.... shit can civil rights and undermine the border in an effort to destroy the USA. and "Progress" it into a shit hole like Venezuela.

The moderate liberals, libertarians and conservatives are the ones who want you assholes to stop attacking our civil rights and undermining the nation state proper.
 
There is nothing in it that has not been done before, and worked out well enough. Federal funding of infrastructure? Goes back to the Whigs. Election reform? The Voting Rights Act was constitutional. There isn't even single-payer health care in the present agenda. It's not even social-democratic.



Immigration =/= invasion.

Type that 100 times.



:rolleyes: Will you drop that preposterous canard once and for all?! The Dems are not trying to import Dem voters.

But illegal immigration does equal invasion. Repel the illegals by any means.
 
:rolleyes: I hope you don't mean Minutemen means.

FLIR equipped ground attack aircraft would be preferable.

I have a high preference for A-29 super Tucano, A/C-130 gunships and A-10 warthogs, nothing wrong with sea bugs, vipers or rotary though.

Come in the front door like you're supposed to, or get treated like a threat.

Just like a house.

The current left hardly exists. And, no, the Democrats are not the left. The corporations own both parties.

You can lie to yourself all you want but it won't get anymore true.

Democrats openly pursue an equity agenda, they are definitively leftist no matter how much you want to pretend otherwise.

War isn't peace, 2+2 does NOT equal 5 either...... there are four lights. :)
 
Last edited:
Democrats openly pursue an equity agenda, they are definitively leftist no matter how much you want to pretend otherwise.

I wish I could believe you. But I don't see them doing anything that could seriously threaten the political hegemony of the 1%, let alone of the 20% -- and both are intolerable.
 
Last edited:
Only if you're dishonest enough to conflate equality with equity, the way you, peck and other "progressive" (D)egenerates love to do.

I honestly embrace both.....a modern day Liberal and proud of it.

"Equality means each individual or group of people is given the same resources or opportunities. Equity recognizes that each person has different circumstances and allocates the exact resources and opportunities needed to reach an equal outcome."

How much would you bet that Washington(and all slave owning liberals of that time) allocated resources on an Equity basis?
 
I wish I could believe you.

Read their platform, they talk all about it.

Read their actions... that's all they are after. From the billionaire tax to "Free shit for everyone!!" they are openly anti-liberty, anti-civil rights, anti-equality leftist. :)
 
:rolleyes: I hope you don't mean Minutemen means.

Every able bodied armed Texan should be on that border to do what Biden cannot do, repel with whatever force is necessary the coming invasion of tens of thousands of illegals marching through Mexico to trespass on and despoil our country..
 
I honestly embrace both.....a modern day Liberal and proud of it.

"Equality means each individual or group of people is given the same resources or opportunities. Equity recognizes that each person has different circumstances and allocates the exact resources and opportunities needed to reach an equal outcome."

How much would you bet that Washington(and all slave owning liberals of that time) allocated resources on an Equity basis?

And that is the precise reason you and people like you must be expunged from society. If you want Communism, move to China.
 
I honestly embrace both.....

Directly opposite of each other you can't have both.



a modern day Liberal and proud of it.

Can't be anti- civil liberty, anti-democracy, anti-equality and call yourself a liberal.

"modern day" is almost a direct acknowledgement you understand this and thus add the bullshit prefix.

"Equality means each individual or group of people is given the same resources or opportunities. Equity recognizes that each person has different circumstances and allocates the exact resources and opportunities needed to reach an equal outcome."

Yes, equal opportunity or equitable outcome.

You can have one or the other, not both.

How much would you bet that Washington(and all slave owning liberals of that time) allocated resources on an Equity basis?

Everything..... they lived in mansions and the slaves lived under the porch.

Pretty over the top inequity.
 
Read their platform, they talk all about it.

Read their actions... that's all they are after. From the billionaire tax to "Free shit for everyone!!" they are openly anti-liberty, anti-civil rights, anti-equality leftist. :)

I don't see them doing anything that could seriously threaten the political hegemony of the 1%, let alone of the 20% -- and both are intolerable.
 
Back
Top