Angel
Cuntbeans
- Joined
- Dec 26, 1999
- Posts
- 33,975
There have been questions and arguments and discussions over whether or not remotely linking to an image is okay as opposed to yanking them from the website and uploading it, so I'm copying over and slightly editing a part of my post from another thread.
-------------
I owned a website, on which I used to place pictures of my paintings, drawings, the few photographs I took and some digital art.
I had to shut it down because of people directly linking to the files on my website. I paid for a fixed amount of bandwidth each month, and if I went over, I was charged for it.
Someone on here stated that the bandwidth usage from people remotely linking was a mere blip, but that is not always true. My account package included double what my current website is, and each month I was going more then three times over it, and having to pay for it.
The truth is that if you remotely link from a website, your link itself will be a very tiny blip, but combine that with all of the other people who could be doing the very same thing and it adds up. And only the webmaster will know exactly how high it does.
I eventually sold the domain, bought a new one and changed over to webdesign and graphics, and I used to have tons of freebies that I made for people to take and upload onto their own server, and yet again people insisted on remotely linking to the images, and again I was paying more and more each month.
When I found places it was happening, webhosts were contacted, and accounts were terminated.
I don't do that anymore. It's not worth it.
Be aware that most webmasters nowadays who don't want you to remotely link to their images will say so on their website. They say it for a reason. I did, and people still did it.
That said, you'd be surprised at the number of webmasters who will actually say yes if you do ask them if you can remotely link, this way they can keep track of it. I've asked quite a few and have rarely gotten a no.
This is what I do now, for certain people.
-------------
I owned a website, on which I used to place pictures of my paintings, drawings, the few photographs I took and some digital art.
I had to shut it down because of people directly linking to the files on my website. I paid for a fixed amount of bandwidth each month, and if I went over, I was charged for it.
Someone on here stated that the bandwidth usage from people remotely linking was a mere blip, but that is not always true. My account package included double what my current website is, and each month I was going more then three times over it, and having to pay for it.
The truth is that if you remotely link from a website, your link itself will be a very tiny blip, but combine that with all of the other people who could be doing the very same thing and it adds up. And only the webmaster will know exactly how high it does.
I eventually sold the domain, bought a new one and changed over to webdesign and graphics, and I used to have tons of freebies that I made for people to take and upload onto their own server, and yet again people insisted on remotely linking to the images, and again I was paying more and more each month.
When I found places it was happening, webhosts were contacted, and accounts were terminated.
I don't do that anymore. It's not worth it.
Be aware that most webmasters nowadays who don't want you to remotely link to their images will say so on their website. They say it for a reason. I did, and people still did it.
That said, you'd be surprised at the number of webmasters who will actually say yes if you do ask them if you can remotely link, this way they can keep track of it. I've asked quite a few and have rarely gotten a no.
This is what I do now, for certain people.