Philosorgasmic

[Hamletmaschine]

Okay, let me just get the camera from lexie and make y'all a few "Kodak moments" here....

 

[Dillinger]

Not only am I a gentleman and a scholar...

I'm also suede and de-boner.

 

[erosman]

A multi-dimensional convergence. The release of energy when fusion occurs. The spontaneous ovation when an idea is expressed that triggers mass emotional or spiritual unity. So what is your metabolic rate for philosorgasm? Is the libido feeding on the endorphic calories? Is it similar to the unleashing of passion that can accompany adrenaline?
No doubt I have experienced philoso-, emotio-, spirit-orgasm...where the transparence of unity brings moisture to my eyes. Unfortunately, this particular Pavlonian moisture of sexual appetite has never found its way into my RL sex. Probably because, the restraint to wait for its own climactic timing doesn't exist. Hamlet's example of missed opportunities probably occurred because of fortunate - or unfortunate - restraint. Others of us rush headlong like lemmings to premature orgasmic moments, our hormones hungrily burning the fuel of passions. I think the restraint of cyberspace probably cultivates your philosorgasm.

 

[TWB]

Free, your posts never fail my friend!
I simply need another cup of coffee, and perhaps some food to go along with the caffeine.

I have a nice phyloorgasmic phylodoughpastry here, if you would like a bite. Tastes Great with Coffee.

 

[GreenEyedGirl]

Erosman, although cyberspace has cultivated a few philosogasms, in RL I have to admit to have the pleasure of experiencing this as well. ALthough it is much easier for a woman to say "Let's fuck now! And loudly!" to a man whilst in discussion or debate. Coming from a man, a majority of women would be either offended or shocked into dryness.

And waiting to fulfill this release of energy from fusion (excellent description) by restraint is difficult, but soooo worth the effort.
It is philosotantrigasm.


Damn I am just going to call Webster's right now! They need me!

 

[GreenEyedGirl]

I have a nice phyloorgasmic phylodoughpastry here, if you would like a bite. Tastes Great with Coffee.

LMAO

Only if there is honey in that there pastry!

 

[Guest]

OMG!

 

[Guest]

 

[Dillinger]

When I act gentlemanly?

 

[Dillinger]

Philosorgasms hmmm... is that anything like:

Intellecstacy?

 

[GreenEyedGirl]

Dilly! Of course you would expand on this!

intellecstacy can lead to philosorgasm. But I do not believe that they are dependant upon each other. although if one can have them both together......

OH MY!

 

[riff]

Would having a cerebrection fit in here?

 

[freescorfr]

Is phalology the study of these neo- erotologisms?

I'm deviating there into mere specu-elation. I should stick to the neuro-erotic sense of the thread.

 

[GreenEyedGirl]

Would having a cerebrection fit in here?

I would hope so! How big is your cerebrum anyways that you must ask?

 

[GreenEyedGirl]

Is phalology the study of these neo- erotologisms?

I'm deviating there into mere specu-elation. I should stick to the neuro-erotic sense of the thread.

Neuro-erotic is the base of this thread, but if you feel the need to branch, please do!
Spec-elation is a fabulous thing to do, especially on this board!



(Although I must admit that in writing neuro-erotic, I almost typed neurotic. Hmmmmmmmmmmm...... New thread perhaps? The connection between neurosis and eroticism?)

 

[freescorfr]

Neuro-erotic is the base of this thread, but if you feel the need to branch, please do!
Spec-elation is a fabulous thing to do, especially on this board!



(Although I must admit that in writing neuro-erotic, I almost typed neurotic. Hmmmmmmmmmmm...... New thread perhaps? The connection between neurosis and eroticism?)

"Given sel-fconsciousness, sex becomes a new gestalt....Sexual impulses are always conditioned by the person of the partner; what we think of the other male or female, in reality or fantasy or even repressed fantasy, can never be ruled out. The fact that the subjective person of the other to whom we relate sexually makes least difference in neurotic sexuality, say in patterns of compulsive sex or prostitution, only proves the point more firmly, for such requires the blocking off, the checking out, the distorting of self-consciouness. Thus when we talk of sexuality in terms of sexual objects, as Kinsey does, we may garner interesting and useful statistics; but we simply are not taling about human sexuality..." Rollo May.

Whic is why this thread is so good, because it is looking at sex as the fucking of two persons not two bodies. This is anti-pornography.

 

[GreenEyedGirl]

quote:
"the fucking of two persons not two bodies."

I never thought to do it any other way! My body is the vessel of my mind. Through my flesh, my thoughts become corpreal, my desires take shape, my fantasies form.
And when my partner can engage me within that arena.........
Hoo Boy!


But anti-pornography? LOL Don't tell riff! He'll never post here again!

But does pornography have to be the flesh only? What does the word break down to? The study of what? And why is it considered such an evil?

Ohhhhh I feel a tangent coming on here!

 

[freescorfr]

quote:
"the fucking of two persons not two bodies."

I never thought to do it any other way! My body is the vessel of my mind. Through my flesh, my thoughts become corpreal, my desires take shape, my fantasies form.
And when my partner can engage me within that arena.........
Hoo Boy!


But anti-pornography? LOL Don't tell riff! He'll never post here again!

But does pornography have to be the flesh only? What does the word break down to? The study of what? And why is it considered such an evil?

Ohhhhh I feel a tangent coming on here!

If I could add a corollary, as a question slightly off your tangent.

I was wondering this this morning, and your assertion about only ever fucking as a person is appropriate to it; have I ever had sex with someone and not formed a strong - possibly always loving - relationship with them?

I think there is a sense in which every girl I've had a sexual relationship with has a place in my heart for ever.

Now that would fit if I'm a peron fucker - not if I'm a body-only fucker. But a lot of porn suggests you can be a body-only fucker. That's the neurosis.

So is there a place in your heart GeG for all your former lovers? Or is it only men who are like that?

 

[freescorfr]

That should read "Person" fucker - not Peron fucker. Muy bien?

 

[Calamity Jane]

intellecstacy and philosorgasm... exactly what I'm missing in my life!

My body is pretty easy to please... but my brain, oh my brain is a picky bitch, and she's been ignored too long.


I need intellicourse.

 

[Nathon_88]

intellecstacy and philosorgasm... exactly what I'm missing in my life!

My body is pretty easy to please... but my brain, oh my brain is a picky bitch, and she's been ignored too long.


I need intellicourse.

Don't we all? I spent the evening talking to someone with whom I could have an amazing philosorgasm......but.....we're too alike....too worried about hurting the other person to take from them....Both wanting to give, and give.....when we should take.

 

[Calamity Jane]

Ah but Nathon... you can't even begin to give until you've learned to take... selflessness is deadly and lonely and gray.

Be selfish... have a true meeting of the minds... an all night mind fuck... take and take and take until you don't even realize that you're really giving.

 

[Nathon_88]

Ah but Nathon... you can't even begin to give until you've learned to take... selflessness is deadly and lonely and gray.

Be selfish... have a true meeting of the minds... an all night mind fuck... take and take and take until you don't even realize that you're really giving.

Stop that. You're making sense.......

*smiles* And if I just want to take hours of pleasure licking and pleasing with my mouth....

 

[GreenEyedGirl]

I need intellicourse. [/B]

Perfect! Exactly the phrase to flesh out this discussion (pun intended! I'm feeling punchy tonight)

Intellicourse. The communion of two intellects. The connection between touch and thought. The fucking of the whole person, as Free so eloquently wrote.

LOL and it also sounds like an internet correspondence course.



And yes Free, every lover I have ever been with has a place in my soul and mind for as long as I have both. To get my legs to spread, you must have spread my mind first! And that in itself is more intimate than copulation alone. So how could they not be in my heart? And I hope that tradition continues.

And is that considered a "male" trait? I thought that women were supposed to be more sentimental in the strains of love and sex? Are men as touched by intellicourse? Interesting thought.

 

[Pdxmwm]

Words...

I like the word intellicourse, for when you read my words, you give me entry to your mind. The staying power of words, exceeds the stamina of the longest physical coupling.