Philosorgasmic

"Intellectual congress" ... "dousing of panties" ... oh, my!

I'm getting some serious wood here.
 
No such thing as an intellectual in Congress.

So tell me - if Con is the opposite of Pro - wouldn't that mean that Congress is the opposite of Progress?
 
Hamletmaschine said:
"Intellectual congress" ... "dousing of panties" ... oh, my!

I'm getting some serious wood here.


Some how I knew you'd like this topic!
Glad you're of the same mindset! ;)
 
Dillinger said:
No such thing as an intellectual in Congress.

So tell me - if Con is the opposite of Pro - wouldn't that mean that Congress is the opposite of Progress?

Ahh, but progressive congress is the better choice!
 
freescorfr said:
Who are the "sexy" philosophers? De Beauvoir, Sartre, David Lodge( does he qualify), Gabriel Marcel [for me] and the moderns I've missed out on - Lacan, Derrida, surely.
They can get the heart beating faster, true.
Ah! But you've omitted what are, for some of us, two of the greats. Perhaps they're not truely philospphers but thier works certainly have stood the test of time and talking about them is... stimulating, in all senses of the word.

The compte de Sade, Donatien Alphonse François Sade (1740–1814), a French author, known as the Marquis De Sade. Charged with numerous sexual offenses, he spent 27 years in prisons or asylums, writing obscene romances, including Justine (1791). His theory that since sexual deviation and criminal acts exist in nature, they are natural, foreshadowed modern psychological thought. Sadism, the infliction of pain to attain sexual pleasure, is named for him.
-and-
Leopold von Sacher-Masoch, (1836-1895), who is best known for the novel, “Venus in Furs,” about the masochistic relationship between Serverin von Kusiemski dreamer and dillatante, and Wanda von Dunajew, a beautiful, free-spirited widow, to whom he becomes a slave. The novel is based on real events from the author’s life. It is was also the novel that Dr. Richard von Krafft-Ebing singled out in the origin of the word “Masochism.”

I love the terms philostimulation and philorgasmic! Sex always begins in the brain, anyway; we all know that. Without the willing and eager assent of our brains, our bodies don't get wet or hard. Without the urgency of our thoughts, our bodies lie still, just bags of water and meat.

The best sex is that in which the ongoing intellectual connection is the strongest, most ardent part of the process until one's body touches that of her partner - and then, then, almost-spontaneous ignition flames coherent thought out of the realm of possibility.
 
Last edited:
I must admit to seeing your point, if it will help me progress toward congress with a certain green-eyed beauty.
 
cymbidia said:

I love the terms philostimulation and philorgasmic! Sex always begins in the brain, anyway; we all know that. Without the willing and eager assent of our brains, our bodies don't get wet or hard. Without the urgency of our thoughts, our bodies lie still, just bags of water and meat.

The best sex is that in which the ongoing intellectual connection is the strongest, most ardent part of the process until one's body touches that of her partner - and then, then, almost-spontaneous ignition flames coherent thought out of the realm of possibility.

Very well said! Especially our bodies being bags of water and meat without our thoughts being engaged.

Just beautiful cym!
 
Last edited:
Always a delight to read your take on these matters, Cym.

Glad you're able to spend some time here, again.


:rose:

~H~
 
I acknowledge what you say Cymbidia although I'm a novice in that area, nonetheless I find Lit is enlightening me. I read Justine when I was, perhaps, too young. I live near Chateau D'O - is that related to it?

GeG, my post clearly failed. I thought the start, "Well it depends what you mean by......." would give it away.

And then I got hung up on trying to say what Hamletsmachine said much better.
 
Free, your posts never fail my friend!
I simply need another cup of coffee, and perhaps some food to go along with the caffeine.
 
Okay, enough foreplay. It's time to rip off our clothes and fuck . . . loudly. Don't you think?
 
Hamletmaschine said:
Okay, enough foreplay. It's time to rip off our clothes and fuck . . . loudly. Don't you think?

You are still clothed? Really?
Uhmmmm..... *pushes clothes around on floor with toe*
I'm ready!
 
jeez i always stumble upon these threads late.... don't mind me, get to the loud fucking.... i'll be in the corner with my non functional video camera....
 
seXieleXie said:
jeez i always stumble upon these threads late.... don't mind me, get to the loud fucking.... i'll be in the corner with my non functional video camera....

Corner? There are no corners in philosorgasms! All areas are rounded! Jump in the fray, there's plenty of room!
 
.

So, I have no idea where this thread may go. But I am curious as to what you think about this new word. Have you had a philosorgasm? Can you inspire a philosorgasm? Are you philosorgasmic?...........



Sorry, Babe! I tried. A good 'brain-fart' is about all I can come up with!

dickE
 
seXieleXie said:
jeez i always stumble upon these threads late.... don't mind me, get to the loud fucking.... i'll be in the corner with my non functional video camera....

Would you put the fucking camera down and just take off your clothes?
 
Back
Top