Perspectives.....

horny_giraffe said:
That's kind of the critical point, isn't it? Once you contact someone via email or PM, that is. I guess at that point it is a rather cruel thing to do.

You made me aware of something additional, as well.

Previously, I've been thinking that people stupid enough to develop internet relationships get what they deserve. It occurs to me, however, that this sort of argument bears a striking resemblence to the justification that I've heard from criminals who say that a person was an idiot for leaving their door unlocked and therefore deserved to be robbed.

Yes, leaving your door unlocked is pretty stupid--but that doesn't mean you deserve to be robbed. Similarily, developing a relationship from the internet in my experience is rarely successful--but that doesn't mean that someone deserves the pain they receive, however foolish they may have been.

Taking advantage of one's strengths to exploit other people is cruel. The kind thing is to keep your distance if you feel that you don't feel like honoring another sensitivities. (For the record, as intrigued might say, I did not participate in the main memorial thread at all. I did not believe that I could muster the appropriate sensitivity, so I maintained my distance. I did post a mildly acerbic comment to an additional "memorial" thread that someone else started up, as I thought they came across as particularly crass and attention-seeking by starting up an additional thread. )

In many ways, some of the most famous "trolls" on this site are the most kind in their cruelty. Their cruelty is obvious and lacks subtlety--few people are fooled and even fewer are bothered. A subtle barb from a poster that one considers a friend can be much more painful, and a major lie from a friend can be very destructive to someone that has come to depend on them.

Many points to address here. Sorry.:)

Its of merit to point out that internet relationships that are successful to whatever degree usually are initiated as a springboard to meeting in person. (If not...all this discussion is a moot point) Think of it like using a personals service, the work is done ahead of time, and can really be quite advantagous. When relationships are taken to the next level, IM, phone, etc...it becomes as real as any other relationship.

I've found that I've learned so much more about others when meeting them in this venue than say, a blind date, or someone you meet off the street, providing I've done my homework. The tools are there, you just have to use them. You can get to know someone over time, good days, bad days, perspectives, moods, triggers...etc and you can do so in a manner that is timely. What transpires online/long distance could very well take months to happen between two strangers meeting in person for the first time.
When the intent is honest, well, I can't see that it is a less valued way of meeting/finding a mate.

In Rams case, he was just screwed. Period. Did he deserve it...is that a real question???:confused:

With regard to your last paragraph on trolls, you are absolutely correct. Hanns never bothered me until he took my pictures. In this case, hell yes, I deserved it for being stupid. I'll not explain again my reasons for ever posting my pics, my intent means squat. I got something beautiful out of it...and thats about the only way left for me to look at it. I can't undo it now.

It is when troll are friends first and then troll you, as LordLucan74 did with me, that it hits hard. Its when you realize that it goes deeper for some trolls than others, as in obsession, that it hits even harder.
I've never had a response of this nature to me and I realize I didn't handle it well. And actually, I don't know that I ever will...he is truly a freaky person.
I know that the best thing to do is to no longer respond to LL at all, but it kills me for him to throw out lies about me, and twist what little relationship we had into something that suits his purposes, which are simply to inflict pain.
I feel when I don't respond that its perceived as "well, he must be telling the truth" or something along those lines and that is very hard for me.
I can only hope that in time, he will hang himself. I have to keep reminding myself that those that know me know the whole story, but still, it bites.


Back to Tan...this is not a new experience for me. At my first message board two years ago, I befriended a female that was bipolar, manic/depressive... and had several other diagnoses that I cannot recall, and I am only stating this because she was quite unstable. When she was up and taking her meds and doing good, she was a wonderful young lady. When not, she bacame clingy and demanding and a little on the obsessive side. She was also a rape victim, and bleeding heart that I am, I befriended her. At this point, I learned that she was bi~sexual and had an interest in me. That was fine, I was married still and she knew I had no interest and said she accepted that. But she did not. I began to try to distance myself because she began to try to manipulate me, and that is one of the worst things anyone can try to do to me, plus, she came to me with problems that I just couldn't handle. Well, she didn't like that worth a damn. Within a week, a thread was started by a so called friend of hers that her abusive boyfriend had beaten her and that she was in the hospital near death.
She was the person that started the thread, and I knew it instantly. I knew it was a manipulative move made to get me to do what she wanted me to do. I played along, but it so violated my sensibilities that I outfoxed her on the board publicly and in the end, she admitted it.
I shut down...shut her out, and walked away.
She apologized, but by then, I was numb.

So...having said that, my feelings about what supposedly happened to Tan were of no importance and still are not. She has made that perfectly clear.
 
intrigued said:
I feel when I don't respond that its perceived as "well, he must be telling the truth" or something along those lines and that is very hard for me.
I can only hope that in time, he will hang himself. I have to keep reminding myself that those that know me know the whole story, but still, it bites.
Only complete idiots would take anything he said seriously, and idiots make lousy friends. Think of him as you screening service - let him weed the losers out for you.
 
crysede said:
Only complete idiots would take anything he said seriously, and idiots make lousy friends. Think of him as you screening service - let him weed the losers out for you.

Ofcourse...his lunacy is frightening. But he implies that he knows me personally and that may lend one to believing him. I assure all, he does not know me personally.
 
intrigued said:
Cheyenne, I understand what you are saying, I understood before. The point I spent all that time trying to make and apparently failed miserably at is this...I did not think it showed a great deal of humanity for a forum board to demand answers from a man that was greiving. It became a feeding frenzy, and seemed to be less about he and Tan, and more about us.
Those questions could have been answered behind the scenes, in due course...and by those really needing to know, not by those just seeking a little entertainment.


Some of the people weren't demanding answers for themselves but were suggesting that RAM needed to get those answers for his own peace of mind. The response of many on the board was to put their heads in the sand just a bit deeper.

The questions were being answered behind the scenes. Hence my first post to this thread- not making assumptions about what Ram was thinking or doing while he was silent on the board.

Do you think you're the only one who can care for other people? For you it must be "concern" but for everyone else it must be "just seeking a little entertainment?" Wrong.
 
intrigued said:
Cheyenne, I understand what you are saying, I understood before. The point I spent all that time trying to make and apparently failed miserably at is this...I did not think it showed a great deal of humanity for a forum board to demand answers from a man that was greiving


He grieved for a two or three whole days. now he's on his way to putting it past him as nothing more than an unfortunate experience.

If the more cynical people on this board hadn't questioned an obviously fishy story he'd still be grieving now, wouldn't he?
 
Problem Child said:
He grieved for a two or three whole days. now he's on his way to putting it past him as nothing more than an unfortunate experience.

If the more cynical people on this board hadn't questioned an obviously fishy story he'd still be grieving now, wouldn't he?

Exactly.
 
Originally posted by Intrigued
It's of merit to point out that internet relationships that are successful to whatever degree usually are initiated as a springboard to meeting in person. (If not...all this discussion is a moot point) Think of it like using a personals service, the work is done ahead of time, and can really be quite advantagous. When relationships are taken to the next level, IM, phone, etc...it becomes as real as any other relationship.

I'm with you there. The trouble is that the words and pictures one presents on the internet form an incomplete portrait of a person, at best--even when people's intentions are good. At worst, they are completely deceptive.

People rarely understand themselves well enough to be able to say "This is the kind of man/woman that I want and need. This is the kind of person I am." Most people just don't know themselves that well. They see themselves from the inside, through the filter of their own perceptions. It has become a cliche of the personals when someone says "I like picnics in the park, walking on the beach, and a good Bordeaux wine." Yes, they like these things, but it says very little about the person.

For me, if I wish a relationship with a person to be anything more than the most casual and anonymous, I need to interact with that person face-to-face. I know that there are still many possibilities for deception, even then. It is my understanding that this woman had met Ram face-to-face and had spent some time with her, as well, which makes the deception even more difficult to deal with.
 
Last edited:
*bratcat* said:
OMG, Chey...are you sitting down??? I actually agree with you.

Well then, that's twice in one night! I agreed with you on another thread about the "sister" telling Ram about the accident being truly sick.
 
Cheyenne said:
Some of the people weren't demanding answers for themselves but were suggesting that RAM needed to get those answers for his own peace of mind. The response of many on the board was to put their heads in the sand just a bit deeper.

The questions were being answered behind the scenes. Hence my first post to this thread- not making assumptions about what Ram was thinking or doing while he was silent on the board.

Do you think you're the only one who can care for other people? For you it must be "concern" but for everyone else it must be "just seeking a little entertainment?" Wrong.

Cheyenne, I NEVER even IMPLIED anything of the sort.

For the last time, the same things said to him on this board could have been said privately....though there is no way in hell that I would have said such a thing to a man that posted the thread that he did. Apparently I am the odd ball again.

Did you see me posting this kind of stuff? No...and you know what? I thought it too, and did not say a word to Ram privately or in this thread because it hit me as unbelievably inappropriate. The reason I thought it is because a friend of hers hinted at it to me by saying "it's not going where Ram thinks it's going". After this conversation with her friend, I talked to Tan and she told me that everything was fine and that they were meeting (last) Friday.

When I read his thread, my heart sank. But I knew without a doubt that Ram would find out the truth in his own time, he is a grown man that loved her and intended to marry her. Did you think he wouldn't go to her funeral? Did you think he wouldn't maybe wish to send flowers, or any other means of expressing his sympathy?


In the comment you quoted above, I am so damn clearly referring to Hanns and unregistereds and those casting doubt within HOURS of his breaking the news. It's troublemaking at a time when he was grieving and it showed disrespect to a woman that he said was dead. (My opinion ONLY, and I get to share it just like everyone else.)

Whether or not anyone decided to put their head in the sand just a bit deeper is not your place or my place to determine, or to shape in any way, it is their own personal decision and if they so choose to, its their business. It is no one elses place to try to steer them to where they want them to go.
Its insulting to think they can't do their own mindmaking.


It is not wrong of me to hope for a memorial thread that would be just that, a memorial thread. Shot to hell.
I wonder, if this had been the truth, if she had really died, how would any of you feel then, after all that was said in that thread? Again, I am back to showing respect for the person he said was dead.
We would have found out the truth regardless. Did we (and only those that did so, not everyone) really have a right to demand answers from a man in mourning, within hours of him sharing the news with us? Is it possible that maybe it occured to him at some point that he wanted answers, too, and that he came to that thought all by himself??
I never spoke for Ram or anyone else but myself. I never said I was the only person that cares for others.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top