Orgasms! Orgasms! Orgasms!

[regularguy13]

Below Deck

I'm not a Doctor, though i sometimes play one when i'm with my wife. I was watching the show "Below Deck". The crew is in their 20's and 30'. One young woman was telling another about her hook up with one of the hot guys. She said, "We did it five times in one night!"

Hope that helps. I'll keep monitoring all reliable sources. r

 

[JanusGoneAwry]

The OP was about a short story length. Your response was about stamina for a single sex session--and that's pretty much how others were taking it. They aren't the same things.

You are right they aren’t the same thing but here is what I said/wrote

“Just to set the stage I believe the answer "However many the author chooses." is a fine one but I'm seriously interested what you think about stories that always have the female and/or male character cumming two or three times in the course of one, albeit protracted, sexual encounter.”

I used a fairly arbitrary Lit page count bc that corresponds to about one sexual encounter in my little uninformed world. I understand, as I think others do, that YMMV with regard to how much ground is covered in any given story so you are right, session does not equal story except in my case and as the original poster those who read my comment above actually interpreted it the way I intended.

I apologize if I was vague, you can chalk that up to my newb status I guess. I do appreciate your feedback and your opinions matter but I wanted to set the record straight with respect to what the OP actually meant or didn’t.

Peace

 

[JanusGoneAwry]

I'm not a Doctor, though i sometimes play one when i'm with my wife. I was watching the show "Below Deck". The crew is in their 20's and 30'. One young woman was telling another about her hook up with one of the hot guys. She said, "We did it five times in one night!"

Hope that helps. I'll keep monitoring all reliable sources. r

Uhhhh you’re not charging me for this research are you?????

 

[KeithD]

You are right they aren’t the same thing but here is what I said/wrote

“Just to set the stage I believe the answer "However many the author chooses." is a fine one but I'm seriously interested what you think about stories that always have the female and/or male character cumming two or three times in the course of one, albeit protracted, sexual encounter.”

I used a fairly arbitrary Lit page count bc that corresponds to about one sexual encounter in my little uninformed world. I understand, as I think others do, that YMMV with regard to how much ground is covered in any given story so you are right, session does not equal story except in my case and as the original poster those who read my comment above actually interpreted it the way I intended.

I apologize if I was vague, you can chalk that up to my newb status I guess. I do appreciate your feedback and your opinions matter but I wanted to set the record straight with respect to what the OP actually meant or didn’t.

Peace

Oops, you got me then. I'm sorry (and am sorry to Zeb for questioning his post) I didn't see that and fixated on something else you were asking, which I won't get into in this post because I don't to water down my bad for having misread what you were asking for.

 

[yukonnights]

Oops, you got me then. I'm sorry (and am sorry to Zeb for questioning his post) I didn't see that and fixated on something else you were asking, which I won't get into in this post because I don't to water down my bad for having misread what you were asking for.

In looking back at the posts, I think I might have been the one to steer the ship off course. Luckily, I quoted a good answer in agreement to the actual question...but I also conflated the page count into my answer, in effect suggesting a second romp.

As I see it, we have two choices: We can either be humble, like we have been above...or we can secretly plot together and turn this all around to be JanusGoneAwry's fault

 

[KeithD]

I'd prefer making it SimonDoom's fault since he pompously set himself up as the voice of the AH yesterday.

 

[yukonnights]

I'd prefer making it SimonDoom's fault since he pompously set himself up as the voice of the AH yesterday.

Shush...not so loud...I'm in. It doesn't matter who takes the fall.

 

[SimonDoom]

I'd prefer making it SimonDoom's fault since he pompously set himself up as the voice of the AH yesterday.

I got a good belly laugh out of this one.

I did not intend to take the position of "Voice of the AH" -- whatever that is -- but now that I think about it, if the office is open I'll take it, and if I get it I will gladly accept blame for whatever it is I said, however pompously I said it, even if I can't remember what it was, and even if I don't agree with it anymore.

 

[KeithD]

Fine with me. After seeing what gets posted on the AH, I'm happy with letting you have that and just being the voice of really have been there and done that.

 

[Hypoxia]

I researched online a little and found a possible chemical cocktail of hypnotics, Viagra precursors, sperm-generators, etc that let two women rape a bound man for hours. The formula is in one of the middle BOOK OF RUTH episodes. They all orgasmed a lot but he didn't necessarily enjoy it. Ah, the wonders of chemistry.

I wrote RANDY RANDY (THE PORNOMANCER) as a parody about a guy who attracted and endlessly fucked women forever. Unrealistic? Who cares?

 

[KeithD]

Unrealistic? Who cares?

Those who are clueless about what the purpose of erotica is.

 

[Zeb_Carter]

The OP was about a short story length. Your response was about stamina for a single sex session--and that's pretty much how others were taking it. They aren't the same things.

Maybe not in your stories.

 

[jehoram]

Interesting thread. But it got me thinking about how multi-orgasmic readers respond to a story versus mono-orgasmic readers.

For me, as a typical male, despite how many orgasms are described, it's "one and done" ... I get one orgasm out of the story. I might be good for another one after the refractory period, but not right away. By then, I'm on to the next story.

But for women who can ride an orgasm for longer, or who experience multiple orgasms within a short period of time, is the reading experience different? Can women get a separate orgasm from each description of sex in a single short story? I really don't know. I've never asked a woman this.

 

[KeithD]

For me, as a typical male, despite how many orgasms are described, it's "one and done" ... I get one orgasm out of the story. I might be good for another one after the refractory period, but not right away. By then, I'm on to the next story.

You don't write any stories that cover more than one day?

 

[KeithD]

Maybe not in your stories.

Right, my short stories are rarely limited to a single sex scene. Some can cover years or decades. So, that's right, it's not "short story equals a single sex scene" for me.

 

[JanusGoneAwry]

Interesting thread. But it got me thinking about how multi-orgasmic readers respond to a story versus mono-orgasmic readers.

For me, as a typical male, despite how many orgasms are described, it's "one and done" ... I get one orgasm out of the story. I might be good for another one after the refractory period, but not right away. By then, I'm on to the next story.

But for women who can ride an orgasm for longer, or who experience multiple orgasms within a short period of time, is the reading experience different? Can women get a separate orgasm from each description of sex in a single short story? I really don't know. I've never asked a woman this.

I think that's a great question and one deserving its own thread frankly, so a broader audience can chime in.

I always have my female characters in mind with regard to the actual physical aspects of sex in my stories and frankly, all of the stories I have written thus far (only 2 of them published here as of today) are for female friends of mine. I've always asked if they get off on them but I've never asked if they can, or do bridge multiple orgasms across the story arc. I always ask what I can do to make the story better, more erotic for them so I have been the benefactor of that feedback over the years.

A fascinating question actually.

 

[gordo12]

Personally I'd love to see more feedback from women over the sex scenes. I ran a story by one woman once and she made it very clear that certain things I found sexy were non-starters for her.

So there's a new thread.

Women, tell us how you really want it written.

Then again the majority of the audience are men and the stories are written more for them.

 

[KeithD]

What seems to beg discussion as well is how strictly a story needs to be clinically pristine and controlled by reality check to be erotic--ergo sexually arousing (realizing, of course, that the edge to this is would differ from person to person). My view is that the eroticism and arousal come from pushing the edges, not staying strictly within them.

 

[JerseyGirlDownUnder]

“Just to set the stage I believe the answer "However many the author chooses." is a fine one but I'm seriously interested what you think about stories that always have the female and/or male character cumming two or three times in the course of one, albeit protracted, sexual encounter.”

I used a fairly arbitrary Lit page count bc that corresponds to about one sexual encounter in my little uninformed world. I understand, as I think others do, that YMMV with regard to how much ground is covered in any given story so you are right, session does not equal story except in my case and as the original poster those who read my comment above actually interpreted it the way I intended.

Peace

The first story I wrote had the tag line of "First person account of too many orgasms." It describes 6+ of hers and 1 of his. It was in one page, all in one encounter. Of course, there was almost nothing BUT the descriptions of the orgasms in the short. Nobody left a cranky comment... but I suppose they never would have opened the story in the first place if they didn't want to read that advertised idea. Someone better at statistics can determine if it was viewed a "normal" amount of times.

 

[OmnislashXX]

I totally get that and in some of the genres that is sexy as hell, but in stories of mutual consent other than the male character wanting to last as long as possible (Stud Syndrome) isn't cumming one of the goals of the sex?

Not the only goal or perhaps not even the main goal but one of them wouldn't you say?

Yeah. But what if the dude finds himself on the bottom, her legs are locked around him, he has no condom and he's trying not to cum inside, but the sex makes him creampie her anyway? Oops.

*And I thought that I responded to this thread before but I suppose my response didn't go through.

 

[JanusGoneAwry]

Yeah. But what if the dude finds himself on the bottom, her legs are locked around him, he has no condom and he's trying not to cum inside, but the sex makes him creampie her anyway? Oops.

*And I thought that I responded to this thread before but I suppose my response didn't go through.

Ok so first of all "HOT" and second to echo a point that I believe KeithD has been making all along regarding the author being true to their story and allowing the audience to find their way to what interests them. (My apologies to KeithD if I fucked that up)

For ten years now I've written stories exclusively for dancers in strip clubs and have profited off of their delight now I feel like I'm stepping into an arena for real and some of the stories posted here are fucking incredible and some not so much. In the case of the later, it's usually more a case of my disconnect with the genre.

My OP was rather selfishly intended to validate what I had already been doing or give me the nudge away from that and to a more compliant storyscape. My take away from the kind and considerate posts to this thread thus far is "To thine own story be true" and that's a pretty fucking alright thing in my books.

So in the immortal words of James Joyce "Here's a fucking dancing banana"

 

[OmnislashXX]

Really, I have no idea what you just said.

 

[JanusGoneAwry]

Really, I have no idea what you just said.

I should probably stop putting Ambien in my coffee.

 

[yukonnights]

Ok so first of all "HOT" and second to echo a point that I believe KeithD has been making all along regarding the author being true to their story and allowing the audience to find their way to what interests them. (My apologies to KeithD if I fucked that up)

For ten years now I've written stories exclusively for dancers in strip clubs and have profited off of their delight now I feel like I'm stepping into an arena for real and some of the stories posted here are fucking incredible and some not so much. In the case of the later, it's usually more a case of my disconnect with the genre.

My OP was rather selfishly intended to validate what I had already been doing or give me the nudge away from that and to a more compliant storyscape. My take away from the kind and considerate posts to this thread thus far is "To thine own story be true" and that's a pretty fucking alright thing in my books.

So in the immortal words of James Joyce "Here's a fucking dancing banana"

Translation point 1) It's fucking hot to envision a guy on the bottom with (insert name)'s legs wrapped around him until he losses control and makes a mess. Implies interest in "domination"

Translation point 2) Keith got another person to say they're sorry...even though they don't quite know why

Translation point 3) OP was making sure that her stories were not too far out of the norm in an attempt to determine if adjustments might be needed for best reception by intended audience (i.e. pander to the crowd).

Translation point 4) OP agrees that the important thing is for authors to be true the story they have to tell.

Translation point 5) OP is satisfied with input and waves goodbye

This translator wishes to thank OP for the question and learned that women indeed have a better sex life than men

 

[JanusGoneAwry]

Janus would like to thank the representative from Alaska

Translation point 1) It's fucking hot to envision a guy on the bottom with (insert name)'s legs wrapped around him until he losses control and makes a mess. Implies interest in "domination"

Translation point 2) Keith got another person to say they're sorry...even though they don't quite know why

Translation point 3) OP was making sure that her stories were not too far out of the norm in an attempt to determine if adjustments might be needed for best reception by intended audience (i.e. pander to the crowd).

Translation point 4) OP agrees that the important thing is for authors to be true the story they have to tell.

Translation point 5) OP is satisfied with input and waves goodbye

This translator wishes to thank OP for the question and learned that women indeed have a better sex life than men

Woah!!! Thank you

On point 3, I come from a different place than Lit. I know my audience, personally. I see them and interact with them, giving them that opportunity to steer my stories to their delight. I get direct and explicit feedback and have the opportunity to fix the things that they don't like. I don't know how that translates out here IRL where you have no idea who's reading your stuff and voting or down voting them seemingly at random.

I will admit that pandering to the crowd deserves a

Question: Does that mean I can keep putting Ambien in my coffee?