Obama ‘Strongly Objects’ to Religious Liberty Amendment

Busybody

We are ALL BUSYBODY!
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Posts
55,323
Obama ‘Strongly Objects’ to Religious Liberty Amendment




Obama ‘Strongly Objects’ to Religious Liberty Amendment



By Todd Starnes

The Obama Administration “strongly objects” to a proposed amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act on Wednesday that would have protected the religious rights of soldiers – including evangelical Christian service members who are facing growing hostility towards their religion.

FOLLOW TODD ON FACEBOOK FOR CULTURE WAR NEWS. CLICK HERE TO JOIN!

The amendment was authored by Rep. John Fleming, R-La. It would have “required the Armed Forces to accommodate ‘actions and speech’ reflecting the conscience, moral, principles or religious beliefs of the member.”

The Obama Administration said the amendment would have a “significant adverse effect on good order, discipline, morale, and mission accomplishment.”

“With its statement, the White House is now endorsing military reprimands of members who keep a Bible on their desk or express a religious belief,” Fleming told Fox News. “This administration is aggressively hostile towards religious beliefs that it deems to be politically incorrect.”

Fleming introduced the amendment after a series of high-profile incidents involving attacks on religious liberty within the military- including an Air Force officer who was told to remove a Bible from his desk because it might give the impression he was endorsing a religion.

He said there are other reports of Christian service members and chaplains being punished for their faith.
•The Air Force censored a video created by a chaplain because it include the word “God.” The Air Force feared the word might offend Muslims and atheists.
•A service member received a “severe and possibly career-ending reprimand” for expressing his faith’s religious position about homosexuality in a personal religious blog.
•A senior military official at Fort Campbell sent out a lengthy email officially instructing officers to recognize “the religious right in America” as a “domestic hate group” akin to the KKK and Neo-Nazis because of its opposition to homosexual behavior.
•A chaplain was relieved of his command over a military chapel because, consistent with DOMA’s definition of marriage, he could not allow same-sex weddings to take place in the chapel.

Last month Coast Guard Rear Admiral William Lee told a National Day of Prayer audience that religious liberty was being threatened by Pentagon lawyers and service members are being told to hide their faith in Christ.

“Leaders like myself are feeling the constraints of rules and regulations and guidance issued by lawyers that put us in a tighter and tighter box regarding our constitutional right to express our religious faith,” he said.

Fleming said the purpose of his amendment is to clarify ambiguities in the Pentagon’s policies.

“The bottom line is the military is bending over backwards to remove – even in the case of chaplains – expressions of faith and conscience,” Fleming said.

Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, called the Obama Administration’s edict a “chilling suppression of religious freedom.”

“The Obama administration has joined forces with those who are attacking the religious freedoms of those who serve in our Armed Services,” Perkins said. “The Administration’s opposition to Rep. Fleming’s religious freedom amendment reveals that this administration has gone beyond accommodating the anti-Christian activists who want to remove any vestige of Christianity from the military, to aiding them by blocking this bipartisan measure.”
 
The military can burn BIBLES

But

Touch a KOO KOO RAN without gloves.....get COURT MARTIALED:mad:
 
Isn't 'Freedom of Religion' covered in the Bill of Rights...

Obama's just out-of-control!
 
The problem aint Obama, the problem is us. We're a nation of cowards and girly men.

Back in the 1800s men like Jackson and Lincoln didn't need guards, cuz they knew they could whup anyones ass who messed with them. Now we just piss our pants and go see the shrinkette.
 
The problem aint Obama, the problem is us. We're a nation of cowards and girly men.

.

a kid eats a POP TART that looks like a GUN and the UN gets involved

This PC shit is killing us

IT IS OBAMA'S FAULT!

He sets the tone
 
I never understood the religion/military thing.

1. If you are a thumper, why are you in an organization who's sole purpose is to kill people.

2. If we have a separation of church and state (which we really don't), why are the tax payers paying for religious facilities on government property, and putting preachers/rabbi's/whatever muslim leaders are called, on the government payroll.


As an aside, I don't also don't understand the pandering to a wild-eyed killer's wife and kids.
 
The First Amendment would actually prevent that kind of thing because it prevents the government from taking any stance on religion. This is just more right wing conservative Christian bullshit being posted by the troll racist himself busy body.

How's that tiny penis club you started you fucking piece of shit?

Dummy.
 
The First Amendment would actually prevent that kind of thing because it prevents the government from taking any stance on religion. This is just more right wing conservative Christian bullshit being posted by the troll racist himself busy body.

How's that tiny penis club you started you fucking piece of shit?

Dummy.

DAN=DUMMY


Its cool the way you always say

ITS NOT TRUE to everything:D
 
The First Amendment would actually prevent that kind of thing because it prevents the government from taking any stance on religion. This is just more right wing conservative Christian bullshit being posted by the troll racist himself busy body.

How's that tiny penis club you started you fucking piece of shit?

Dummy.

If the government can't take a stance does the military have the right to tell a soldier to lose his or her religious reading materials? Materials that were acquired out-of-pocket?

So, no religous materials of any sort should be allowed because these are government employees, government can't take a stance, etc.?
 
Back
Top