Nuclear Weapon Ooops

JAMESBJOHNSON said:
LISA

I confess I was thinking exactly that...airhead, pacifist bimbo.

I was in the Air Force. My son is career Air Force. I know how things work in the Air Force.

Take Vietnam. The SOP in Vietnam for perimeter defense was verbally challenge the intruder 3 times and fire 2 warning rounds before shooting to kill. In practice we executed the SOP in reverse order.

Now! Gigging 70 airmen for the SOP violation is SOP. Burn everyone remotely connected with the incident. In reality, a sergeant in charge of the munitions armory said "FUCK IT, THEYRE FLYING ON THE MISSLE, I AINT GOT TIME FOR THE PAPERWORK BS." Then the loaders sold the idea to the aircraft crew-chief, who got a verbal okay from the aircraft weapons officer. Three people made the decision, not 70.

I'm trying to figure out where in hell they'd store several warheads inside a B52. So likely someone else said FUCK YOU! YOURE NOT GETTING A GODDAMNED SPECIAL PLANE JUST FOR SOME WARHEADS.

Do you have some proof youre not an airhead, etc?


Sr. Dickless


Nuclear weapons or any of their components are NEVER transported via air in the US....
 
Where exactly do you hang crates in the bomb-bay? Most aircraft munitions are packaged in large crates or large pallets.

I get it, you guys all share a brain dont you?
 
JAMESBJOHNSON said:
LISA

I confess I was thinking exactly that...airhead, pacifist bimbo.

I was in the Air Force. My son is career Air Force. I know how things work in the Air Force.

Take Vietnam. The SOP in Vietnam for perimeter defense was verbally challenge the intruder 3 times and fire 2 warning rounds before shooting to kill. In practice we executed the SOP in reverse order.

Now! Gigging 70 airmen for the SOP violation is SOP. Burn everyone remotely connected with the incident. In reality, a sergeant in charge of the munitions armory said "FUCK IT, THEYRE FLYING ON THE MISSLE, I AINT GOT TIME FOR THE PAPERWORK BS." Then the loaders sold the idea to the aircraft crew-chief, who got a verbal okay from the aircraft weapons officer. Three people made the decision, not 70.

I'm trying to figure out where in hell they'd store several warheads inside a B52. So likely someone else said FUCK YOU! YOURE NOT GETTING A GODDAMNED SPECIAL PLANE JUST FOR SOME WARHEADS.

Do you have some proof youre not an airhead, etc?

Your posts seem proof to me.

How on earth did you investigate this incident and come to your conclusions without military interference.

The fact that you argue with me and the majority of the american people who feel nuclear weapons should be watched closely, that hey "fuck it" and accidents and typos is all it takes to lose a half dozen, maybe even lose them to those who would attack my country with them, also seems proof that the "airhead" title belongs to you, unless you are a undercover commie pinko terrorist spy, in which case you are still inept and impotent.

:rose:
 
LISA SIMPSON

Impotent? Are you my 'ex'? Who told you?

Pssst! Lisa! Do you know the difference between feelings and thoughts?

After you elect me President we'll use em to attack France. (We'll disguise the troops as D-Day re-enactors).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
JAMESBJOHNSON said:
LISA SIMPSON

Yes.

If you can't dazzle them with brilliance

"OR"

Baffle them with bullshit

Go completly off topic with a straightfoward personal attack.

Oh well, after hearing you dis-agree with the experts, with your vast knowledge on the storage, shipment, and security of nuclear weapons, I remain convinced that there was a slight "boo-boo" in losing some, and your childish attempt to anger me was a little funny, but I think the intelligent adult conversation is over.

:rose:
 
LISA

Pork the experts. I know what I know. Rob thinks they stuff shit in the glove compartment of a B52, how credible is he?

Read a few of your own posts, dear.
 
JAMESBJOHNSON said:
LISA

Pork the experts. I know what I know.


Well, to help you know what you know. These was not as you stated in earlier posts some uranium hardened bunker busters kept on-hand to load.

"The AGM-129A advanced cruise missile is a stealth, nuclear-capable cruise missile used exclusively by B-52H bombers, specifically designed to carry a W80-1 nuclear warhead with a yield of 5 to 150 kilotons."

The "packages" are kept in specifically designed storage facilities to protect from the elements and only taken out for testing, even practice loading of the weapons was halted in 1991. Perhaps if you read some of these information the next time you say "pork the experts" you may at least know something about what you are talking about. Here you go:

*************************************************************

The original plan was to transport non-nuclear Advanced Cruise Missiles, mounted on the wings of a B-52, to Barksdale as part of a Defense Department effort to decommission 400 of the ACMs

As a gesture to Russia and the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, the first Bush administration took it one step farther in 1991 by ordering all bombers to halt nuclear ground alerts, which allowed bomber crews to practice loading a nuclear warhead, but never taking off with one.

The Defense Department does transport nuclear warheads by air, but instead of bombers it uses C-17 or C-130 cargo aircraft.

Nuclear weapon experts said they were shocked to find out how completely command and control over the six nuclear warheads failed to allow such a mistake to occur.

Hans Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists, said a host of security checks and warning signs must have been passed over, or completely ignored, for the warheads to have been unknowingly loaded onto the B-52.

ACMs are specifically designed to carry a W80-1 nuclear warhead with a yield of 5 to 150 kilotons and delivered by B-52 strategic bombers.

“It’s not like they had nuclear ACMs and conventional ACMs right next to each other and they just happened to load one with a nuclear warhead,” Kristensen said.

The Defense Department uses a computerized tracking program to keep tabs on each one of its nuclear warheads, he said. For the six warheads to make it onto the B-52, each one would have had to be signed out of its storage bunker and transported to the bomber. Diligent safety protocols would then have had to been ignored to load the warheads onto the plane, Kristensen said.

The main risk would have been the way the Air Force responded to any problems with the flight because they would have handled it much differently if they would have known nuclear warheads were onboard,” Fetter said.

***************************************************************

:rose:
 
LISA

The whole event makes no sense in light of what you just posted. If there was a Presidential or Treaty directive prohibiting outboard transport you'd think everyone would know about it.

Every place I ever served the brass made sure we knew what the rules were.
 
JAMESBJOHNSON said:
LISA

The whole event makes no sense in light of what you just posted. If there was a Presidential or Treaty directive prohibiting outboard transport you'd think everyone would know about it.

Every place I ever served the brass made sure we knew what the rules were.

Apparently Bush #1 ordered it in 1991 and forgot to tell you. You can look it up on google. Thats spelled g-o-o-g-l-e.

OMGosh, if only these military and nuclear weapons security people had asked you. Why don't you whip out a memo telling SEC DEF Gates what the rules really is. And also tell him to ignore that lil precaution about never disclosing where nuclear weapons is for national security, because you demand that everbody know about it.

Lemme know his reply, see ya, Lisa.
 
JAMESBJOHNSON said:
LISA

Still makes no sense, if what you say is true.

JBJ.... I think this is exactly the point everyone is trying to make here.

Which is why the brass is so pissed off about it.

Absent any specific knowledge of these particular weapons and warhead procedures, (and not having any reason to google them to begin with), the irony, of course, that I assumed, as I suspect you and most everyone here would have, is that they routinely fly with armed nuclear weapons. So there you go.....

I admit to being mystified when I first saw the headline.... shit... I had no idea they did not do it routinely so I kept thinking I was missing something about the story. I am glad they don't.... just surprised.

It is curious to me that the SOD fell on his sword publicly about this... must have assumed it would "leak" out.....

I am glad they are tightening up the ship... and I am surprised, on some level, that things were apparently that lax, but perhaps that is just a result of overall fatigue on the part of our military.... they have been stretched thin for a long time..... As it did back in the day, this shit takes it's toll. Maybe they are all just smoking dope again like we did, brother.

-KC
 
KC

Tired or not, the incident makes no sense unless someone high up the food chain ordered the warheads attached to the missles. Lowly privates dont make those decisions, Colonels do.
 
JAMESBJOHNSON said:
KC

Tired or not, the incident makes no sense unless someone high up the food chain ordered the warheads attached to the missles. Lowly privates dont make those decisions, Colonels do.

And those are the guys they are going after... three generals, wasn't it?


-KC
 
keeblercrumb said:
And those are the guys they are going after... three generals, wasn't it? -KC

The "captain of the ship" is always ultimately responsible for any SNAFU.
 
JAMESBJOHNSON said:
Where exactly do you hang crates in the bomb-bay? Most aircraft munitions are packaged in large crates or large pallets.

I get it, you guys all share a brain dont you?
You're making this up, they're not transported in crates.
 
KC

You need to understand the military and the politicians. Pols make all kinds of treaties and agreements with no intentions of honoring any of it. And when the military gets caught doing what the pols want, the soldiers get hanged for obeying orders. This is where Dubya is a yellow dog.
 
JAMESBJOHNSON said:
KC

You need to understand the military and the politicians. Pols make all kinds of treaties and agreements with no intentions of honoring any of it. And when the military gets caught doing what the pols want, the soldiers get hanged for obeying orders. This is where Dubya is a yellow dog.

Yeah... and all those pols are are lying dog, theiving m/f's.. except for my guy, of course.

Reminds me of the "The Daily Show -Global Edition (all I get...) from the other night which had a piece (maybe a "shot") at Gen. Sanchez.... juxtaposing his film bites from when he was in Iraq and now.... pretty funny.

-KC
 
I appreciate anyone who has ever served in the military, god bless and thank you, but since the vietnam conflict there have been some drastic changes.

Near the end of the cold war it was clear that trying to get a bunch of bombers out of a base, when that base would be the first target, was not ideal.

Nuc boats were becoming much more technologically advanced, and with the stealth technology specifically they became our fist line of defense, primarily as a deterent. They were hard to detect and locate in the first place, almost impossible. They could evade and retaliate with impunity.

So with the cold war out the US government had no qualms at the SALT meetings downgrading the nuclear air bombers. The B-52 was the aging worn-out dog even with multiple upgrades, useless against enemy attack aircraft able to take them out, and that was back then.

They are still here, as a deterent. The warheads could be loaded, that is the deterent capability.

For much more than a decade, it has been realized, and becomes much more apparent with changing international events, that nuc boats are our major deterrent ......... at least, if we don't start losing a few.

JMO

:rose:
 
The bottom line is this: terrorism is becoming redundant.

We're perfectly capable of destroying ourselves, thank you very much. Those of us who survive the ineptitude of our bureaucracy will clog our arteries with McDonalds freedom fries, or die of food poisoning after dining on a healthful spinach salad with a side of e-coli.

That'll show Bin Laden.
 
shereads said:
The bottom line is this: terrorism is becoming redundant.

We're perfectly capable of destroying ourselves, thank you very much. Those of us who survive the ineptitude of our bureaucracy will clog our arteries with McDonalds freedom fries, or die of food poisoning after dining on a healthful spinach salad with a side of e-coli.

That'll show Bin Laden.

He, he.

Gimme 2 triple cheeseburgers, super fries, tatertots, a chilidog with extra chili and cheese, and A SMALL DIET COKE.

I hear peoples order stuff like that, and am momentarily stunned, but then I figure at least with the small diet coke they are trying.

:rose:
 
Lisa Denton said:
He, he.

Gimme 2 triple cheeseburgers, super fries, tatertots, a chilidog with extra chili and cheese, and A SMALL DIET COKE.

I hear peoples order stuff like that, and am momentarily stunned, but then I figure at least with the small diet coke they are trying.

:rose:

Diet Coke has a subtle piquancy that is lacking in Coke Classic. It makes the perfect counterpoint to the saltiness of french fries and the tang of e-coli. Of course, it's a matter of personal taste but to my mind, the only thing that goes better with Coke than Diet Coke is a Caesar salad with garlic croutons and salmonella.
 
shereads said:
Diet Coke has a subtle piquancy that is lacking in Coke Classic. It makes the perfect counterpoint to the saltiness of french fries and the tang of e-coli. Of course, it's a matter of personal taste but to my mind, the only thing that goes better with Coke than Diet Coke is a Caesar salad with garlic croutons and salmonella.

I love caesar salad with the garlic croutons, but its hard to get fresh salmonella where I live.

:rose:
 
Back
Top