scheherazade_79
Steamy
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2003
- Posts
- 9,677
One thing nobody's mentioned so far (at least I don't think so - apologies if they have) is that a good basic standard of national healthcare is something that benefits everyone.
Even if you're super-rich and can afford the best healthcare in the world, it's still in your interests that the poorer people in your area get good coverage, too.
Two reasons:
1. The economic boost - fewer sick days, greater productivity, increased government revenue, lower taxes for everyone.
2. Epidemic-control - think of all those nasty little conditions and diseases we associate with poverty. Drug-resistant TB, typhoid fever, scabies, measles... As Prince Albert found out, once they gain a foot hold in the community they put everyone at risk - not just the people who live in slums and can't afford good healthcare.
I'm no socialist, but I do believe that health isn't something that should be regulated by how much you or your mommy and daddy earn.
Even if you're super-rich and can afford the best healthcare in the world, it's still in your interests that the poorer people in your area get good coverage, too.
Two reasons:
1. The economic boost - fewer sick days, greater productivity, increased government revenue, lower taxes for everyone.
2. Epidemic-control - think of all those nasty little conditions and diseases we associate with poverty. Drug-resistant TB, typhoid fever, scabies, measles... As Prince Albert found out, once they gain a foot hold in the community they put everyone at risk - not just the people who live in slums and can't afford good healthcare.
I'm no socialist, but I do believe that health isn't something that should be regulated by how much you or your mommy and daddy earn.