I'm asexual, only thing I crush on is flowers, fruit, cake and tacos.
Not all crushes are sexual.
Romantic then? I don't do that either.
How exactly would you categorize this alleged crush I have??
And once again, none of what you've presented has refuted the very large role that women play as domestic abusers both to men and other women. Most of the GB has read your evidence - we have just seen right through your spin doctoring.
But you were using this "joke" to defend against a (bullshit) misandry claim?
When a woman rapes a woman partner or beats up a man, is that
Because the critiques are a giant pile of spin doctoring. Plus I already told you that men do hit harder so that skews things a lot.
Nope, I didn't say I'm an expert. I do say that women rape each other and they hit men without provocation more often than men do it to women, and the statistics bear this out. "Conflict Tactics Scale 2" cannot undo or refute those numbers. They can try to gerrymander the fuck out of statistics but the fact that sexual assault plagues a third of lesbian relationships torpedoes the entire CTS2 agenda: to massage the numbers to continually demonize men and empower / acquit abusive women, based both on speculative analysis of existing statistical studies and a dishonest but very clever, prejudice-driven reclassification of domestic abuse acts.
At last Richard Daily tells the truth!
I'm asexual, only thing I crush on is flowers, fruit, cake and tacos.
At last Richard Daily tells the truth!
)
And once again, none of what you've presented has refuted the very large role that women play as domestic abusers both to men and other women. Most of the GB has read your evidence - we have just seen right through your spin doctoring.
And none of this explains why feminists are protesting against domestic violence by men, but not domestic violence by women. You want men to stand with you so much but when a woman is beating a man, feminists can be counted on to be quite silent, which is why when a man reports being hit by a woman, he's the one who gets arrested - and again, feminists care fuck all.
But you were using this "joke" to defend against a (bullshit) misandry claim?
When a woman rapes a woman partner or beats up a man, is that
a) masculinity
b) femininity?
You're assigning all evil things to masculinity which is associated with men. Which is why feminism, as an ideology, is morally bankrupt and intellectually dishonest: their bigoted ideology holds that even if not all men are evil, all evil comes from men and male-ness.
And again you fail to address the fact that hegemonic masculinity does not properly diagnose the problem. The real cause is power dynamics, and the cause of that is male disposability and mate competition - something that nature inflicts upon males of almost all animal species.
As for feminism being judged by its adherents, your responses have been found wanting.
Because the critiques are a giant pile of spin doctoring. Plus I already told you that men do hit harder so that skews things a lot.
But when a GOVERNMENT study shows women initiate unprovoked violence against men more often than vice-versa, feminist critiques of CTS does not refute that. Statistics clearly show: don't start none, won't be none. Cars should not pick fights with trains if they don't wanna get run over.
Clearly, women start shit more than men do. Statistics clearly dictate this. No feminist critique of CTS refutes this.
Literally they try to break things up into "negotiation" and "psychological aggression" vs "injury" etc. without any evidence at all to support the implied feminist talking points that women are the negotiators and psychological aggressors (minor) and men dominate the assault, injury, sexual coercion, etc. (more severe) categories.
The most insidious aspect of CTS2 is that they classify assault assault ("slapped my partner") as MINOR. Basically the feminist CTS2 model says a woman who slaps a man is not a problem because she didn't injure him (severe). This perpetuates women's rights to go around hitting men without provocation just because he pissed her off. Which in turn eventually leads to escalation (kicking, or weapons use), or him slapping her back and the potential for her to catch an ambulance, which will land his ass in jail while she comes crying to a feminist like you about teh hegemonic masculinitaah. Under CTS2 abusive women will continue to have the absolute fucking field day that they have now: keep slapping him and make a bitch out of him, or until he slaps back and WHAMMO, his life is destroyed, yay feminism, yay girl power, now I can get on the feminist lecture circuit and cry about duh soggy knees.
The most dishonest part of CTS2: Feminist critiques of CTS do not nullify the fact that women - equally sized participants - sexually assault each other in at least 30 percent of lesbian relationships. "CTS2" does not nullify that. I think we can all agree that sexual assault is domestic abuse.
CTS2 is literally trying to gerrymander domestic violence statistics and twist the numbers like a kitten with a ball of yarn to get a "more guilty than her" verdict for men.
But again the telltale elephant in the room is that lesbians sexually assault each other in huge numbers, proportionally speaking. Oh but wait, I'm sure the unfounded feminist talking point here is "women only insist on sex when their partner didn't want it". Totally unfounded but only a fool would put this propaganda past feminists.
Feminist studies of domestic violence ultimately end in the same "women are made of sugar and spice and everything nice and boys are made of snakes and snails and puppy dog tails" propaganda that they always peddle.
Which is why nobody gave a shit when a crowd of women were laughing at a man getting mutilated by his wife for no reason.
In the end, and I know you're not smart enough to read this and comprehend but whatever, this is why you even tried to tangle with me about DV statistics: you are trying very hard to defend the "men are the statistical problem" angle so as to keep the discussion of women abusers from ever happening. I already covered, of course, how CTS2 is a Goddess send for abusive women. But you know this already. Or you're a fucking idiot. And I know #2 is not an option. Feminists are rarely stupid.
That's why we have a "Violence Against Women Act" and not "Americans Against Violence Act" - because there is no need for feminism in any conversation about women perpetrators.
TL;DR: CTS2 = "But men do it more/worse so we shouldn't talk about women who abuse." You're all as transparent as thin air.
Nope, I didn't say I'm an expert. I do say that women rape each other and they hit men without provocation more often than men do it to women, and the statistics bear this out. "Conflict Tactics Scale 2" cannot undo or refute those numbers. They can try to gerrymander the fuck out of statistics but the fact that sexual assault plagues a third of lesbian relationships torpedoes the entire CTS2 agenda: to massage the numbers to continually demonize men and empower / acquit abusive women, based both on speculative analysis of existing statistical studies and a dishonest but very clever, prejudice-driven reclassification of domestic abuse acts.
This is why feminism will never talk about female perpetrators and male victims - because if society starts talking about them at all, there is no need for feminism in the world of domestic violence studies, whatsoever.
At last Richard Daily tells the truth!
I find that totally shocking, and suspect it a lie to save face after letting your hate for white guys slip.
Remember when I posted an example of a prominent feminist who was clearly a hateful piece of shit as evidence that feminism isn't a unified political ideology or movement and certainly not one that is synonymous with equality??? But it was only one example so it's totally not evidence that some feminists and their ideas of what feminism is are hateful pieces of shit??
I'm just returning the favor, so I'll never accept anything from you as evidence of anything. You're filled with nothing but lies and hate.
Do enjoy that.....and bless your heart.
No.
And what exactly qualifies someone to discuss women?
Or are you just white knighting again ??
Said the white knight.....from Detroit. LOL
LOL - I have a friend who says almost exactly the same thing. At one point he was hellbent on inventing the bodydom, to prevent the risk of physical contact with another human being. One of my favourite people.
(Also, coincidentally, a man who I vehemently defended when he was accused by his utter nutbar ex of domestic violence ... but obviously that didn't really happen because LJ reliably informs me that feminists NEVER defend men in cases of DV. EVER.
I wasn't sticking up her..
Sounds like an intelligent person. We'd either love or hate each other.
Brilliant idea either way.
Of course they don't....ALL feminist are of the feminazi variety, clearly
I hope not, if you didn't get consent you might make Detroit the most rapey town in America too.
That's not what I asked moron....
LOL
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/235/520/c21.gif
And is that supposed to be an insult? I'm asexual buddy...I don't care.
1) I didn't copy and paste.
2) Wiki is not a dictionary.....moron.
3) What dangers?? Shit saved my life and made me rich LOL
You must not read what you post then, and have for as long as I can remember.
Shit is comedy gold.
I make up lie after lie after malicious, unfounded about LT because I fear and wish to shame and silence all men who speak out against women who inflict domestic violence on men.
I've rescued over a million women on the Internet and have never been laid once!
Let's take this to post 5,000 Faily Boy, see who tires out first, shall we?
