Never forget what feminism is really about

You know what, you're right, that was wrong of me to call you a liar.

Allow me to take that back. Instead, let me be more accurate:

you suck at reading comprehension.

Better?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qodygTkTUYM

Did it work - did the shelters stop receiving money as a result? (Also, 2000 - really? So it's happening all the time, but this is the best result you can get, from 17 years ago?)
 
Fixed your post - you're welcome.

That was in clear responses to your querying whether mens groups should be responsible for organising the shelters, as was blatantly obvioius from the fact that that query was the only thing included in my post.


Exactly where did I say "it doesn't matter that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, when they try to build men's shelters". Because I didn't - basically, you're lying.
 
That was in clear responses to your querying whether mens groups should be responsible for organising the shelters, as was blatantly obvioius from the fact that that query was the only thing included in my post.


Exactly where did I say "it doesn't matter that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, when they try to build men's shelters". Because I didn't - basically, you're lying.
Yes you did, when you said "Well... yeah."

Because when I explained to you that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, your "well... yeah" is the exact same thing as saying those issues don't matter.

You're just like a white person telling a black person to get a fucking job even though it's a known fact that employers will hire a white felon over an equally qualified black non-felon.

That is why you are KKKimGordon67.
 
Did it work - did the shelters stop receiving money as a result?
They never got it in the first place, thanks to feminists.

(Also, 2000 - really? So it's happening all the time, but this is the best result you can get, from 17 years ago?)
http://nationalpost.com/news/canada...ced-to-close-its-doors-due-to-lack-of-funding

And you continue to avoid the question - why can't taxpayers fund shelters for abused men like they do for abused women?
 
You're just like a white person telling a black person to get a fucking job even though it's a known fact that employers will hire a white felon over an equally qualified black non-felon.

That is why you are KKKimGordon67.

You basically just claimed every HR manager/department from super corps to all the various government entities, business owners and contractors out there are massively racist.

Verifiably wrong and certifiably bat shit insane.

The 1st world isn't as racist as you wish it was....you just suck at life.
 
Here are some comparisons of domestic violence committed against men compared to against women. http://www.thehotline.org/resources/statistics/

Women do experience more, but male victimhood is not a trivial thing, despite what some people claim it to be. :(
KKKimGordon doesn't care - she expects men's groups to do the leg work that feminists have never even had to do, and to compete with feminists for funding on a playing field that completely favors women and disfavors men with EXTREME prejudice.
 
Yes you did, when you said "Well... yeah."

Because when I explained to you that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, your "well... yeah" is the exact same thing as saying those issues don't matter.

You're just like a white person telling a black person to get a fucking job even though it's a known fact that employers will hire a white felon over an equally qualified black non-felon.

That is why you are KKKimGordon67.

Here's what the entirety of my post read:

Quote:
Originally Posted by LJ_Reloaded View Post

But hey, it's all up to Men's Organizations amirite


Well ... yeah.

(Sorry, I still haven't worked out how to copy posts properly.)

As you can see, my 'well yeah' was quite clearly in response to your question "But hey, it's all up to Men's Organizations amirite". I deliberately cut the rest of your previous post out because I wasn't responding to those claims. I wasn't saying those issues don't matter - I was just not responding to them.

So ... exactly where did I say "it doesn't matter that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, when they try to build men's shelters". Because I didn't - basically, you're lying.
 
KKKimGordon doesn't care - she expects men's groups to do the leg work that feminists have never even had to do, and to compete with feminists for funding on a playing field that completely favors women and disfavors men with EXTREME prejudice.

Seriously? You think feminists didn't fight to have shelters set up? You think the money just pours out of the sky for these causes? Seriously?
 
Here's what the entirety of my post read:

Quote:
Originally Posted by LJ_Reloaded View Post

But hey, it's all up to Men's Organizations amirite


Well ... yeah.

(Sorry, I still haven't worked out how to copy posts properly.)

As you can see, my 'well yeah' was quite clearly in response to your question "But hey, it's all up to Men's Organizations amirite". I deliberately cut the rest of your previous post out because I wasn't responding to those claims. I wasn't saying those issues don't matter - I was just not responding to them.

So ... exactly where did I say "it doesn't matter that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, when they try to build men's shelters". Because I didn't - basically, you're lying.
Because when I explained to you that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, your "well... yeah" is the exact same thing as saying those issues don't matter.

That is why you are KKKimGordon67.

This was 100% true the first time I said it, and it's true now. I did not lie.

You will keep getting this same response because your attempt to weasel out of what you said, was failed from the get-go.

You did say those issues didn't matter when you said "Well... yeah." Now fucking own up to it or get lost. I will not allow you option #3. Do test me on this one, KKKimmy. You won't get away with denying what you said, not on my watch.
 
An exercise in SJW mental masturbation in an oped is hardly proof of every single employer in the country being ultra racist.

Verifiably wrong and certifiably bat shit insane.

The 1st world isn't as racist as you wish it was....you just suck at life.

Hiring practices do tend to favour white people over others in most positions - but this article definitely doesn't support the assertion that a white felon will be preferred over an equally qualified black non-felon. (I'm guessing he means 'statistically speaking', because of course supporting that sort of statement with just one case of that happening would be silly.) One can only assume that LJ is lying ... again.
 
Because when I explained to you that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, your "well... yeah" is the exact same thing as saying those issues don't matter.

That is why you are KKKimGordon67.

This was 100% true the first time I said it, and it's true now. I did not lie.

You will keep getting this same response because your attempt to weasel out of what you said, was failed from the get-go.

You did say those issues didn't matter when you said "Well... yeah." Now fucking own up to it or get lost. I will not allow you option #3. Do test me on this one, KKKimmy. You won't get away with denying what you said, not on my watch.

I didn't say those things didn't matter. In response to your very specific question "But hey, it's all up to Men's Organizations amirite", I said 'well yeah' - so, in other words and for the sake of clarity, I said that setting up men's shelters is really the responsibility of men's groups. You really do suck at reading comprehension.

So ... exactly where did I say "it doesn't matter that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, when they try to build men's shelters". Because I didn't - basically, you're lying.
 
Seriously? You think feminists didn't fight to have shelters set up? You think the money just pours out of the sky for these causes? Seriously?
Good point. Technically they had to speak up, that counts as fighting.

But they didn't have to fight the shit that we men's groups have to. They didn't have people saying violence against women is fucking trivial. They didn't have crowds of people laughing on television about women being mutilated. Feminists never had anyone saying that shelters for battered women somehow took away from shelters for other people.

Feminists don't have to go through 1/10th of the opposition we men's groups have to. Because in modern America we have television shows openly MOCKING battered men - a reflection of America's feminist gynocentric culture.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BVXiHh95Tc

Nobody brags about beating up women and nobody fucking trivializes it

For you to spout such hateful and bigoted noise as "Well... yeah" in light of all this shit, while at the same time spouting nonsense like "Feminism helps men"? Yeah, feminism is a hate movement.
 
I didn't say those things didn't matter. In response to your very specific question "But hey, it's all up to Men's Organizations amirite", I said 'well yeah' - so, in other words and for the sake of clarity, I said that setting up men's shelters is really the responsibility of men's groups. You really do suck at reading comprehension.

So ... exactly where did I say "it doesn't matter that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, when they try to build men's shelters". Because I didn't - basically, you're lying.

Because when I explained to you that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, your "well... yeah" is the exact same thing as saying those issues don't matter.
 
Because when I explained to you that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, your "well... yeah" is the exact same thing as saying those issues don't matter.

No, because my 'well yeah' wasn't in response to you explaining to me "that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level". It was in response to a very specific part of your post - the last sentence - which I clearly isolated for the sake of clarity.

So ... exactly where did I say "it doesn't matter that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, when they try to build men's shelters". Because I didn't - basically, you're lying.
 
Hiring practices do tend to favour white people over others in most positions

That's because you can't legislate stereotypes and racism away...you can only make people closet it.

- but this article definitely doesn't support the assertion that a white felon will be preferred over an equally qualified black non-felon. (I'm guessing he means 'statistically speaking', because of course supporting that sort of statement with just one case of that happening would be silly.)

No, I take him at his word...he thinks every employer nation wide is that racist.

He's a fuckin loon.

One can only assume that LJ is lying ... again.

I don't think it's lying.

I think he's so batshit he genuinely thinks he lives in an ultra racist hell where his life is horrible because he's just soooooooo oppressed and such a victim of racist AmeriKKKa! :rolleyes: Typical social justice bigot.
 
Good point. Technically they had to speak up, that counts as fighting.

But they didn't have to fight the shit that we men's groups have to. They didn't have people saying violence against women is fucking trivial. They didn't have crowds of people laughing on television about women being mutilated. Feminists never had anyone saying that shelters for battered women somehow took away from shelters for other people.

Feminists don't have to go through 1/10th of the opposition we men's groups have to. Because in modern America we have television shows openly MOCKING battered men - a reflection of America's feminist gynocentric culture.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BVXiHh95Tc

Nobody brags about beating up women and nobody fucking trivializes it

For you to spout such hateful and bigoted noise as "Well... yeah" in light of all this shit, while at the same time spouting nonsense like "Feminism helps men"? Yeah, feminism is a hate movement.

Sure ... people have thought DV against women was a huge issue since the dinosaurs roamed the earth. They were all just waiting for feminism to come along and open some refuges so they could pour their ample funding into them.
 
That's because you can't legislate stereotypes and racism away...you can only make people closet it.



No, I take him at his word...he thinks every employer nation wide is that racist.

He's a fuckin loon.



I don't think it's lying.

I think he's so batshit he genuinely thinks he lives in an ultra racist hell where his life is horrible because he's just soooooooo oppressed and such a victim of racist AmeriKKKa! :rolleyes: Typical social justice bigot.
Both you and KKKimGordon67 really need to shut your idiot mouths up
 
No, because my 'well yeah' wasn't in response to you explaining to me "that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level". It was in response to a very specific part of your post - the last sentence - which I clearly isolated for the sake of clarity.

So ... exactly where did I say "it doesn't matter that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, when they try to build men's shelters". Because I didn't - basically, you're lying.

Because when I explained to you that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, your "well... yeah" is the exact same thing as saying those issues don't matter.
 
That's because you can't legislate stereotypes and racism away...you can only make people closet it.



No, I take him at his word...he thinks every employer nation wide is that racist.

He's a fuckin loon.



I don't think it's lying.

I think he's so batshit he genuinely thinks he lives in an ultra racist hell where his life is horrible because he's just soooooooo oppressed and such a victim of racist AmeriKKKa! :rolleyes: Typical social justice bigot.

I'm using the term 'lying' a bit ironically here ... 'lying' according to his rather random definition of the term.

But yeah, between the KKK and man hating feminists armed with bazookas, you can see why he stays in his mum's basement.
 
Because when I explained to you that men's groups face overwhelming opposition and funding disparities, including at the taxpayer level, your "well... yeah" is the exact same thing as saying those issues don't matter.

It really isn't.

If anyone agrees with LJ's assertion above, please feel free to pipe in with support for him.
 
I'm using the term 'lying' a bit ironically here ... 'lying' according to his rather random definition of the term.

But yeah, between the KKK and man hating feminists armed with bazookas, you can see why he stays in his mum's basement.
It's not a lie - perhaps if you were half the SJW you claim to be then you'd know that.
 
Back
Top