N. Korea Violates UN Cease Fire Agreement..

Lost Cause

It's a wrap!
Joined
Oct 7, 2001
Posts
30,949
No, this isn't a bash _________ anyone thread by deluded conspiracy America haters. The U.N. will field a force to back up the existing 39,000 US troops, and crush the coming N. Korean offensive. My old unit here is tasked to deploy to Korea in just such an incident. Our warplans are drawn up to react on the violation of the CEASE FIRE signed 50 years ago. Do you think we will do a preemptive strike on the reactor soon? Do you think the Chinese will commit to the N. Korean side like 50 years ago? This is a U.N. fight, not just the U.S., disregarding the anti-American crowd here, do you think the U.N. will commit to this war?

*If you just want to post to bash any aspect of the US, go to P.P. Man's thread, and drivel away, stay off this thread!

SEOUL, South Korea (CNN) -- The North Korean army has brought light machine guns into the Demilitarized Zone, the United Nations Command on the Korean Peninsula said Friday -- a violation of agreements signed in 1953 at the end of the Korean War.

A U.N.C. Military Armistice Commission investigation revealed that the North Koreans had brought into the DMZ automatic weapons, the kind that can be operated by crews.

They were observed transporting, setting up and manning Type-73 light machine guns on six days between December 13 and December 20.

North Korea has been observed breaching the Demilitarized Zone from time to time.

The South Korean army spotted the weapons while providing security for workers building the reconnection of the Gyeongui railroad and adjacent highway between the two Koreas.

The South Koreans reported that their northern counterparts set up the weapons from 100 to 400 meters north of the line and removed them at the end of each day.

U.N.C. said that it sent a message December 23 to North Korea requesting a meeting on the issue, to be held December 26, but the North Koreans would not accept the message.

DEMILITARIZED ZONE
The demarcation line between North and South Korea is known as the 38th parallel.

The line is 2.5 miles wide and 151 miles long.

Nearly 2 million troops guard the line on both sides.

The Demilitarized Zone extends 2,000 meters from each side of the Military Demarcation Line, as agreed to in an armistice to the Korean War signed July 27, 1953.

According to U.S. and South Korean officials, two-thirds of North Korea's 1.1-million-member military are currently deployed close to the border with South Korea.

The U.N.C. report came on the same day that Pyongyang ordered International Atomic Energy Agency monitors to leave the country and began to restart dormant energy plants that the United States says could easily make nuclear weapons.

It also told the IAEA that it will resume operations at its plant for reprocessing spent fuel rods -- a facility capable of making weapons-grade plutonium.



:D
 
Lost

The DPRK has violated terms of the Cease Fire for a couple of decades........only NOW it is publicized.

The UN will huff and puff and bluster and throw dozens upon dozens.......of RESOLUTIONS at the DPRK......as to war? I doubt it.

There will be no preemtive strike agains the Nuke facility.......Israel is to far away.......and the world will not "stand" for the US to do it.

Why are there SO MANY in SKorea that actually demostrate FOR the DPRK and against the US?

Why should we care if the DPRK takes over the South........and then turns the South into the miserable shit hole the North is????? Japan?........
 
Briefly Serious

SINthysist said:
Does Don K. Dyke write your material or just edit your style?

C'mon SIN . . . you know LC writes his own stuff . . .

Being serious for a rare moment . . . you specification of the 38th parallel demonstrates how flimsy the peace really is in Korea. Perhaps the Administration should rethink its policy of withholding the agreed oil supplies. The last time conscripts were sent to Korea, many were killed, and conscription would appear to be the ultimate aim of the Administration.

We live in dangerous times . . . why is the Administration stirring up trouble in the world??

End of being serious. :)
 
Last edited:
Re: Briefly Serious

Don K Dyck said:
Perhaps the Administration should rethink its policy of withholding the agreed oil supplies.

There are/were violations of the treaty that started the withholding of oil.

The first blame is on DPRK, not the US.
 
Re: Re: Briefly Serious

HeavyStick said:
There are/were violations of the treaty that started the withholding of oil.

The first blame is on DPRK, not the US.

Oh, have there been? But then I s'pose that U$ foreign policy since 1945 has been totally defensive of the U$ nation . . . like Somalia, Nicuragua, Chile, Argentina, Philippines, Vietnam . . . the list goes on, the war crimes accumulate . . . at least Robert McNamara had the good sense to confess that he was wrong . . . the world waits to arrest Kissinger . . . and will pursue the Bush Family Dynasty in the future . . . :)
 
Donkey Dick's Political Philosophy

Everything is America's fault
 
Re: Re: Re: Briefly Serious

Don K Dyck said:
Oh, have there been? But then I s'pose that U$ foreign policy since 1945 has been totally defensive of the U$ nation . . . like Somalia, Nicuragua, Chile, Argentina, Philippines, Vietnam . . . the list goes on, the war crimes accumulate . . . at least Robert McNamara had the good sense to confess that he was wrong . . . the world waits to arrest Kissinger . . . and will pursue the Bush Family Dynasty in the future . . . :)

Instead of staying on focus, within the intentions of the thread, you wander off everytime.

You repeat the same idiotic rhetoric, hoping in some vile attempt to show intelligence and gain respect. The problem is you are repeating it ovewr and over again.

Concessions with DKRP were made and recognized by the world community. DKRP violated agreements it made.

If the DKRP would get rid of some of it's military, let's say 50%, it could use that money to feed it's people.

You result to bashing events that date back 50-60 years instead of contributing to a possible solution or greater understanding of the current dilemna.

I'm not even happy when I say this. You are an idiot.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Briefly Serious

HeavyStick said:
Instead of staying on focus, within the intentions of the thread, you wander off everytime.

You repeat the same idiotic rhetoric, hoping in some vile attempt to show intelligence and gain respect. The problem is you are repeating it ovewr and over again.

Concessions with DKRP were made and recognized by the world community. DKRP violated agreements it made.

If the DKRP would get rid of some of it's military, let's say 50%, it could use that money to feed it's people.

You result to bashing events that date back 50-60 years instead of contributing to a possible solution or greater understanding of the current dilemna.

I'm not even happy when I say this. You are an idiot.

Hi Stick, what has changed in US policy in the last six months?? Very little, hence the repetition. The world works as a complex simultaneous interaction of many processes, not as a sequential series of events. it is difficult to divorce one aspect of U$ foreign policy from another . . .

OK, NK could reduce the military numbers . . . and create unemployment at home with consequential social unrest . . .

SIMILARLY, the US government could put a quarter of "defense" spending into social programmes for expanding the internal economy of America by generating useful jobs, thus lowering the unemployment rates, save another quarter by reducing armaments purchases or developing a fixed price contract system with suppliers (a very difficult job) and STILL match the spending of the rest of the world on "defense".

The present day solution that you request is for the U$ to encourage non-polluting industries at home in recognition of the Kyoto obligations, encourage efficient use of petroleum fuels, develop alternative enegry sources and fuel systems, stop initiating war opportunities, re-write the Corporations Laws to make executives responsible to the shareholders rather than themselves, provide a national health scheme to make sound health affordable in America, make voting at Federal elections at least compulsory on the Oz model . . . and that is only the start.

I understand why you are not happy . . . with a government looking after vested interests to the detriment of the general population, few voters would be. :)
 
Counter Capitalist Revolutionaries......

Your leader's have issued new orders for how you are to attack the imperialist, warmongering, American pigs!

The international community is becoming increasingly critical of the U.S. hostile policy toward the DPRK and warning it of its adverse consequences. Foreign policy analysts and personages in different countries are unanimous in their views that the U.S. loud-mouthed fiction of North Korea's "nuclear program" and its assertion that dialogue with Pyongyang is possible only after it scraps its "nuclear program" are aimed to put the Korean Peninsula under its control and create a favorable atmosphere and conditions for carrying out its strategy to dominate Asia.
The Finnish Kominform News Agency in an article posted on its internet homepage dismissed North Korea's "nuclear suspicion" as a pretext invented by the Bush administration to mount a military attack on it. It called on the international community to closely follow the moves taken by the U.S. after groundlessly kicking up a nuclear racket.
Harising Khang, member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) in a statement said that what the U.S. truly seeks in raising a hue and cry over North Korea's "nuclear issue" is to destroy the economy of the DPRK and stifle its socialism.
The Dec. 13 issue of the British newspaper Guardian in an article on the situation on the Korean Peninsula said that such world-stunning announcements made by North Korea as its declaration on resuming the operation of its nuclear facilities and its statement accusing the U.S. of its operation to seize a DPRK ship carrying missile parts that ended in failure convinced the world how difficult it is to deal with the North Korean Government.
North Korea is stunning its rivals stronger than itself in a do-or-die spirit, far from yielding to them, and winning victory by employing strategies and tactics more skillful than theirs. It also said that the U.S. and its allies might have miscalculated, quoting a military expert as saying that the outside world does not understand the psychology of North Korea and it will not bend its knees.
Many other countries are warning bush, accustomed to superpower behaviour and seized with war fever, to behave with discretion, well aware of North Korea's attitude toward the U.S.
Even the most conservative diplomats of the U.S. are criticizing Bush's policy, saying that a war with the DPRK is unimaginable and horrible consequences to be entailed in case North Korea burning with revengeful thought takes military actions compels the U.S. to reconsider the war option. Even a limited military attack on a nuclear power plant arouses apprehensions as the DPRK may regard it as a declaration of war, it added.

*Oh, and to kiss Sodamn Insane's ass, go here; www.uruklink.net/eindex.htm

FTW :D
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Briefly Serious

Don K Dyck said:
Hi Stick, what has changed in US policy in the last six months?? Very little, hence the repetition. The world works as a complex simultaneous interaction of many processes, not as a sequential series of events. it is difficult to divorce one aspect of U$ foreign policy from another . . .

OK, NK could reduce the military numbers . . . and create unemployment at home with consequential social unrest . . .

SIMILARLY, the US government could put a quarter of "defense" spending into social programmes for expanding the internal economy of America by generating useful jobs, thus lowering the unemployment rates, save another quarter by reducing armaments purchases or developing a fixed price contract system with suppliers (a very difficult job) and STILL match the spending of the rest of the world on "defense".

The present day solution that you request is for the U$ to encourage non-polluting industries at home in recognition of the Kyoto obligations, encourage efficient use of petroleum fuels, develop alternative enegry sources and fuel systems, stop initiating war opportunities, re-write the Corporations Laws to make executives responsible to the shareholders rather than themselves, provide a national health scheme to make sound health affordable in America, make voting at Federal elections at least compulsory on the Oz model . . . and that is only the start.

I understand why you are not happy . . . with a government looking after vested interests to the detriment of the general population, few voters would be. :)

The US doesn't have a starvation on it's hands. DPRK does.
 
Re: Briefly Serious

Don K Dyck said:
C'mon SIN . . . you know LC writes his own stuff . . .

Being serious for a rare moment . . . you specification of the 38th parallel demonstrates how flimsy the peace really is in Korea. Perhaps the Administration should rethink its policy of withholding the agreed oil supplies. The last time conscripts were sent to Korea, many were killed, and conscription would appear to be the ultimate aim of the Administration.

We live in dangerous times . . . why is the Administration stirring up trouble in the world??

End of being serious. :)


I meant BusyBody and you damned well know it Ozhead!

:D
 
Re: Re: Briefly Serious

SINthysist said:
I meant BusyBody and you damned well know it Ozhead!

:D

Sorry SIN . . . did I miss a post somewhere? :D
 
Back
Top