Mr. Speaker! We Need To Get Back To Benghazi

[Disgustipated]

Much like the OP, this topic is well past its prime and time to be put down.

 

[Pookie]

So, I'm guessing that Pookie has not read the report and is reacting to what she "knows."

Which one of the nine are you referencing?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Pick one.

 

[Pookie]

Much like the OP, this topic is well past its prime and time to be put down.

Just one more bedtime story, please?!?!

 

[Pookie]

Pick one.

Reality. Let me know when you get up to speed on it.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You're just taunting in order to avoid anything of substance.


Typical for liberal Democrats.


All mouth and hot air...

 

[miles]

So, I'm guessing that Pookie has not read the report and is reacting to what she "knows."

She doesn't have to read it to know it's wrong.

 

[Darbhinder]

Prairie nigger resurrecting the dead...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

She doesn't have to read it to know it's wrong.

All she has to do is keep repeating what she hears on the good morning news...

They found no new accusations against Hillary Clinton.

This then becomes the lie of omission, they found nothing new. All they had to do was watch the Press conference to know two things, one that this investigation was never focused on Hillary Clinton, but what happened or did not happen at Benghazi and that there were several new things that came out as a result of this investigation that show the Administration cared more about the optics and politics of the attack going into the elections than even attempting to try and save lives. Additionally, since some of the evidence is still hidden, I mean over 30 new Clinton emails turned up just the other day.

But because they refuse to even try to educate themselves, because its too hard for their little brains, they engage in little-brain behavior.

 

[Pookie]

She doesn't have to read it to know it's wrong.

Thanks for your input, XanoPhil!

 

[Pookie]

All she has to do is keep repeating what she hears on the good morning news...

They found no new accusations against Hillary Clinton.

This then becomes the lie of omission, they found nothing new. All they had to do was watch the Press conference to know two things, one that this investigation was never focused on Hillary Clinton, but what happened or did not happen at Benghazi and that there were several new things that came out as a result of this investigation that show the Administration cared more about the optics and politics of the attack going into the elections than even attempting to try and save lives. Additionally, since some of the evidence is still hidden, I mean over 30 new Clinton emails turned up just the other day.

But because they refuse to even try to educate themselves, because its too hard for their little brains, they engage in little-brain behavior.

It's a seven million dollar flop. Sharknado has had better sequels.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You don't even know what's in the report.

It is a flop with Democrats.

On that we agree.

But you were going to vote Democrat no matter what they do. You do not mind being lied to and deceived as long as your team is the one doing the lying and deceiving. Just partisan hackery. People died, and to protect themselves politically your party created a false narrative that they knew was a lie. They didn't care. The only thing they cared about was getting elected so that they (mainly the Clintons) could keep the money train rolling.

 

[Pookie]

You don't even know what's in the report.

It is a flop with Democrats.

On that we agree.

But you were going to vote Democrat no matter what they do. You do not mind being lied to and deceived as long as your team is the one doing the lying and deceiving. Just partisan hackery. People died, and to protect themselves politically your party created a false narrative that they knew was a lie. They didn't care. The only thing they cared about was getting elected so that they (mainly the Clintons) could keep the money train rolling.

It's a flop with everyone. Even the nuttier wingnut members felt the need to add a credit scene to it to try to save it.

 

[Lancecastor]

I think we need to focus more on Huma Weiner.



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BSS9_vECcAA7SiS.jpg

 

[Comshaw]

http://pompeo.house.gov/uploadedfiles/pompeo-jordan_additional_views.pdf

Short version

Actually since you tout your views as being fair I think you should try to be and read ALL the report.

The other half of the short version:

http://democrats-benghazi.house.gov/sites/democrats.benghazi.house.gov/files/documents/Report_of_the_Benghazi_Select_Committee_Democratic_Members-Honoring_Courage_Improving_Security_and_Fighting_the_Exploitation_of_a_Tragedy.pdf


Comshaw

 

[snugglestruggle]

I think we need to focus more on Huma Weiner.



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BSS9_vECcAA7SiS.jpg

I'll bet you Hillary has had her face buried between Huma's thighs more than once.

Hey Mr. Speaker, Hillary lied about the attack but in Washington that's not news. It's not even a crime, it's SOP for a Clinton or any politician for that matter.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Why do the Democrat mention Donald Trump?


He wasn't even in politics when this happened.


I think that outs their report, as well as their obstruction and obscuration as political an act as blaming the movie that is designed to try and protect their brand and candidate because elections are coming up.


The Republicans, it claimed, as all of you have claimed all along, were only targeting Hillary Clinton, which is a lie. Hillary Clinton turned herself into a target during the course of the investigation(s). It took forever to discover her private, unsecured and hacked (by at least one person, the Russians, Chinese, Israelis and Allah knows who else probably have accrued quite the blackmail file on Secretary Clinton) and bring her emails to light. In fact as was stated at the news conference yesterday and highlighted in the full report and the summary was the fact that we still do not have all the facts, emails and evidence because the Democrats at State, in the White House and the candidate are still trying to hide, from the American People, the full story of what they did and why they did it. The Republicans were just trying to figure out why the hell the administration acted more strongly to protect itself than it did the people it purposely put in harm's way. Democrats seem clearly on the side of protecting the administration because they desire to see Hillary in the Oval Office.

Not one of you is willing to ask yourself, if she lied to my face (and the faces of the family) at a time when she was telling her daughter and her foreign contributors that it was clearly a terrorist attack, what lies will she tell me once elected and in charge? If she did not want me to know what she was doing the whole time that she was Secretary of State, what will she keep from me as President? If she is willing to accept huge bribes from Wall Street, foreign governments and those rich misogynist and homophobic Islamic States, what will she do in office to reward them, and will we ever find out what she did to reward them? We know her husband gave rocket technology to the same Chinese who are now beginning to build artificial islands to encroach upon the South China Sea and its neighbors.

How you can support this is beyond rationality and smacks of a cult.

 

[Disgustipated]

Why do the Democrat mention Donald Trump?


He wasn't even in politics when this happened.


I think that outs their report, as well as their obstruction and obscuration as political an act as blaming the movie that is designed to try and protect their brand and candidate because elections are coming up.


The Republicans, it claimed, as all of you have claimed all along, were only targeting Hillary Clinton, which is a lie. Hillary Clinton turned herself into a target during the course of the investigation(s). It took forever to discover her private, unsecured and hacked (by at least one person, the Russians, Chinese, Israelis and Allah knows who else probably have accrued quite the blackmail file on Secretary Clinton) and bring her emails to light. In fact as was stated at the news conference yesterday and highlighted in the full report and the summary was the fact that we still do not have all the facts, emails and evidence because the Democrats at State, in the White House and the candidate are still trying to hide, from the American People, the full story of what they did and why they did it. The Republicans were just trying to figure out why the hell the administration acted more strongly to protect itself than it did the people it purposely put in harm's way. Democrats seem clearly on the side of protecting the administration because they desire to see Hillary in the Oval Office.

Not one of you is willing to ask yourself, if she lied to my face (and the faces of the family) at a time when she was telling her daughter and her foreign contributors that it was clearly a terrorist attack, what lies will she tell me once elected and in charge? If she did not want me to know what she was doing the whole time that she was Secretary of State, what will she keep from me as President? If she is willing to accept huge bribes from Wall Street, foreign governments and those rich misogynist and homophobic Islamic States, what will she do in office to reward them, and will we ever find out what she did to reward them? We know her husband gave rocket technology to the same Chinese who are now beginning to build artificial islands to encroach upon the South China Sea and its neighbors.

How you can support this is beyond rationality and smacks of a cult.

When do you think Drumpf got "in" to politics, Cap'nInjin?

 

[Comshaw]

Why do the Democrat mention Donald Trump?


He wasn't even in politics when this happened.


I think that outs their report, as well as their obstruction and obscuration as political an act as blaming the movie that is designed to try and protect their brand and candidate because elections are coming up.

And 8, count them, 8 investigations into the exact same thing, with nothing more then was discovered the first 7 times (discounting the server issue which was and is a separate issue entirely and should be judged and discussed as such) isn't partisan and obstructionist? 7 Million dollars wasted with no added information on Benghazi? Of course the Dem's were trying to protect their brand. If things had been reversed the Rep's would have done the same. But god damn it, there comes a time when you have to accept the truth and quit playing the game and the truth here is there is and was nothing more to find on his subject.
Edited to add: And Stevens family agrees that Hillary should not be blamed for his death.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/chris-stevens-family-not-blame-000000575.html




The Republicans, it claimed, as all of you have claimed all along, were only targeting Hillary Clinton, which is a lie. Hillary Clinton turned herself into a target during the course of the investigation(s). It took forever to discover her private, unsecured and hacked (by at least one person, the Russians, Chinese, Israelis and Allah knows who else probably have accrued quite the blackmail file on Secretary Clinton) and bring her emails to light. In fact as was stated at the news conference yesterday and highlighted in the full report and the summary was the fact that we still do not have all the facts, emails and evidence because the Democrats at State, in the White House and the candidate are still trying to hide, from the American People, the full story of what they did and why they did it. The Republicans were just trying to figure out why the hell the administration acted more strongly to protect itself than it did the people it purposely put in harm's way. Democrats seem clearly on the side of protecting the administration because they desire to see Hillary in the Oval Office.

Again I'll reiterate, the server issue is an entirely separate one and should be handled as such. Because of the seriousness of the issue, when it was found another panel should have been convened to address it. The two investigations should have been kept separate because the server issue has merit while the 8th Benghazi investigation was a Republican partisan strike at their opponents and was meritless from the start. It was so much bullshit dressed up in finery to keep the issue before the American public into the election cycle. I don't have a problem with calling ANY politician to task for screwing the pooch; I do have a problem with playing political games with our time and our money. The assholes work for us and need to get back to doing just that.

Not one of you is willing to ask yourself, if she lied to my face (and the faces of the family) at a time when she was telling her daughter and her foreign contributors that it was clearly a terrorist attack, what lies will she tell me once elected and in charge? If she did not want me to know what she was doing the whole time that she was Secretary of State, what will she keep from me as President? If she is willing to accept huge bribes from Wall Street, foreign governments and those rich misogynist and homophobic Islamic States, what will she do in office to reward them, and will we ever find out what she did to reward them? We know her husband gave rocket technology to the same Chinese who are now beginning to build artificial islands to encroach upon the South China Sea and its neighbors.

How you can support this is beyond rationality and smacks of a cult.

Lets take a close look at that "LIE" shall we? Most politicians lie to accomplish something. Exactly what was she trying to accomplish? As you say "IF" she lied (and there is no positive facts to support that conclusion) perhaps it was to placate the public until such time as they had facts about the situation. OR it could have been bad intelligence. OR it could have been her best estimate of the situation. Or any number of other reasons. One thing is for sure, no matter what was said the truth of it was bound to come out, so why lie in the first place?

That being said why are you so adamant in believing that she lied, discounting all other possibilities? And why are you so certain that GWB and his administration didn't lie about the WMDs? Why use one criteria to judge Hillary and a different one to judge GWB when the situations were very similar? The only difference was the repercussions from each. One did nothing but stir up a hornets nest of accusations, speculation and ire, while the other lead us into a war.

AJ you always claim you are a Libertarian, but the tone and content of your post are far right Republican. As Cheech and Chong once said,"If it looks like dog shit, if it smells like dog shit..."

Hoofta! I've exhausted my verbosity for at least a week. Nuff' said.



Comshaw

 

[Aglaopheme]

Why you ask?

“This may not be politically correct, but I think that there was a big part of this investigation that was designed to go after people and an individual, Hillary Clinton,” Rep. Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.) said on WIBX First News with Keeler in the Morning, a radio show in upstate New York.

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) last month let it slip that the committee aimed to sink Clinton’s poll numbers. His gaffe reverberated across Capitol Hill and was a major factor in McCarthy’s abrupt decision to drop out of the race to replace outgoing House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio).

McCarthy later walked back his comments, claiming he misspoke.

But on Wednesday, Hanna suggested that McCarthy was being truthful.

“Sometimes the biggest sin you can commit in D.C. is to tell the truth,” Hanna said.

Clinton, who has repeatedly said she is cooperating with the committee’s investigation, is set to testify next week.

On Sunday, a former committee staffer alleged that the chairman, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), fired him for not focusing the probe on Clinton and the State Department.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_561ef9eae4b0c5a1ce62037e

The Republicans, it claimed, as all of you have claimed all along, were only targeting Hillary Clinton, which is a lie.

How you can support this is beyond rationality and smacks of a cult.

Horses mouth, sporto.

 

[Ubiquitious_too]

They're still dead. No one did anything about it and they all conspired to lie to us- the people.

Have you no sense of right, wrong, or corruption?

 

[miles]

Was Hillary lying or telling the truth when she told the nation and the relatives of the Benghazi victims the attack was caused by a YouTube video?

Deflecting, attacking me, or answering the question with another question is a dodge and an admission that she lied.

It's a very simple question which can only be answered yes or no.

 

[Ubiquitious_too]

Was Hillary lying or telling the truth when she told the nation and the relatives of the Benghazi victims the attack was caused by a YouTube video?

Deflecting, attacking me, or answering the question with another question is a dodge and an admission that she lied.

It's a very simple question which can only be answered yes or no.

She lied. She told Chelsea the truth in an email.
period!

 

[Darbhinder]

She lied. She told Chelsea the truth in an email.
period!

How do you know? That email was TOP SECRET!

 

[HighSchoolJock]

Was Hillary lying or telling the truth when she told the nation and the relatives of the Benghazi victims the attack was caused by a YouTube video?

Deflecting, attacking me, or answering the question with another question is a dodge and an admission that she lied.

It's a very simple question which can only be answered yes or no.

Holy fuck your a dumb fuck if the question yoru asking is if she lied or told the truth than the answer people give cant be yes or no because when people say yes or no no one will know if there saying yes to lying or yes to the truth go back to your own country and learn english and the metric system you dumb fucking foreginer get that cock out of your ear

Scotty