Mr. Speaker! We Need To Get Back To Benghazi

We wanted to put Saddam down, leaving him be would most likely have hurt little if anything in the grand scheme of things. . .well we wouldn't be spread to thin to deploy (if you buy that malarky) if we weren't still recovering from that. But hey, do stupid things.
 
The mental deterioration you speak of is apparent in anyone who wants to argue that a communist isn't a leftist. In your case however there is very little to deteriorate, and in his, none whatsoever.

I don't see you REFUTING those facts on Putin that Sean laid down in his post, basic bitch. You went right past his post because you can't REFUTE them. That's the new buzz word you're jizzing over lately, "refuting."

Putin was being hungrily lip-locked by the nut sack by your side for the better part of a month, all in the hopes of slighting Obama over the Ukraine and Crimea. That means you bitches will lay down, bend over and put out for anyone, including the enemy, as long as it serves your purposes.

That's the definition of a ho bag.

That's what y'all are. Traitorous ho bags. So go get your shots, fish. They're affordable now. REFUTE THAT.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_md3ukoOYpm1qa6g1m.gif
 
Gowdy is a good man, but let's be clear, fundraising off of the incompetence that led to their deaths, isn't the same as fundraising off the dead. That kind of malfeasance deserves the light of day, and the money it takes to put it down.

Let's really be clear - the loyal opposition did not turn into ghouls when the marines were killed in the terrorist truck bombing of the barracks in Lebanon. Putting them in there was clearly an incompetent decision.

There was no malfeasance in Benghazi. The bad guys killed the good guys. Where is the outcry for justice?
 
Your full of shit. He was a KGB Lt. Colonel as such he was a fully vetted Communist. He was a member of the Communist Party until it was dissolved in 1991. You are an ignorant naive fool.

Because that was the only way to become a powerful man in that society. It is why he is an opportunist, do you even think before you respond?
 
Okay, so I'm still wondering:

Bush lied and people died
People died and supposedly Obama lied

Which is more tragic?
Oh yeah, the people died BEFORE a lie :rolleyes:
 
Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Pig Virus) Calls For Congressional Hearings On “Offensive” Washington Redskins Name…


Henry Waxman

To clarify: Benghazi committee = Bad. Congressional hearings on a football team’s name = Huge priority.
Via DCist:


The racist remarks by Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling, which led to a lifetime ban from the NBA and a $2.5 million fine from NBA commissioner Adam Silver, have led many to question the racist connotations from a different team in professional sports: the Washington football team.

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-California) is urging the Committee on Energy and Commerce to hold a hearing to examine the racial insensitivity of the team’s name in light of the actions taken against Sterling.

The team’s derogatory name has been a source of controversy for decades, and has heated up in recent years because of several high-profile Change the Name campaigns, most notably the one launched last year by the Native American group Oneida Indian Nation. In a letter to Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), who chairs the Committee, Waxman writes that “in the case of the Washington football team, the offensive conduct is public, not private…but is being condoned and defended by the National Football League.”

Despite the fact that the NFL is a private league, Waxman says it “enjoys many public advantages,” which is why Congress has the right to step in on the matter. He also mentions how Washington was the last segregated franchise in the NFL, and it took public pressure from the federal government to get then-owner George Marshall to integrate the team.

“As the Committee with primary jurisdiction over sports, we could play a constructive role in challenging racism by asking Mr. [Dan] Snyder and Mr. [Roger] Goodell,” Waxman writes, “to explain in a public hearing how their actions are consistent with the public interest.”
 
I have him and his limited brain on Iggy, so it's only when I'm bored that I view one of his posts. However, what he just posted is beyond idiocy and deserves no reply, in fact I've already taken that notion apart like a clock anyway. I might as well be instructing a turnip.

You believing his screed has any merit whatsoever is a grim reminder that the towering intellect you claim as your own, is as small as the two democrat raisins you got hangin', little man. Now, go and find another ankle to hump.:cool:

blah blah blah. That's all you can do in front of truth, with a thesaurus wrapped around your dick like a busted burrito. He ain't on iggy, you need him.

Refute his facts or shut up.

THAT'S WHAT YOU SAY.
 
I believe the only shame in the Washington Redskins name is the part associating it with Washington DC. I propose the "American Redskins."

Thanks again for confirming your racist tendencies.
 
The Congress made our mission clear, read the war resolution.

I just did, that's a steaming pile of crap reasons to go to war if the WMD charges weren't in the list. Nice try, linking Iraq to 9/11 too.
 
I have him and his limited brain on Iggy, so it's only when I'm bored that I view one of his posts. However, what he just posted is beyond idiocy and deserves no reply, in fact I've already taken that notion apart like a clock anyway. I might as well be instructing a turnip.

You believing his screed has any merit whatsoever is a grim reminder that the towering intellect you claim as your own, is as small as the two democrat raisins you got hangin', little man. Now, go and find another ankle to hump.:cool:


It's ok. You iggy free thinkers yet banter with racists. Good on you, tubby. :cool:
 
I believe the only shame in the Washington Redskins name is the part associating it with Washington DC. I propose the "American Redskins."

America's Angriest White Men:

Second, the extreme Right is extremely patriotic. They love their country, their flag, and everything it stands for. These are the guys who get teary at the playing of the national anthem, who choke up when they hear the word America. They have bumper stickers on their pick ups that show the flag with the slogan “These colors don’t run.”

The problem is that the America they love doesn’t happen to be the America in which they live. They love America—but they hate its government. They believe that the government has become so un-American that it has joined in global institutions that undermine and threaten the American way of life. Many fuse critiques of international organizations such as the United Nations with protectionism and neoisolationism, arguing that all internationalisms are part of a larger Zionist conspiracy. Some embrace a grand imperial vision of American (and other Aryan) domination and the final subjugation of “inferior races.”

<snip>

That such ardent patriots are so passionately antigovernment might strike the observer as contradictory. After all, are these not the same men who served their country in Vietnam or in the Gulf War? Are these not the same men who believe so passionately in the American Dream? Are they not the backbone of the Reagan Revolution? Indeed, they are. The extreme Right faces the difficult cognitive task of maintaining their faith in America and in capitalism and simultaneously providing an analysis of an indifferent state, at best, or an actively interventionist one, at worst, and a way to embrace capitalism, despite a cynical corporate logic that leaves them, often literally, out in the cold—homeless, jobless, hopeless.
 
Back
Top