Morris Says A Landslide Is On The Way

[garbage can]

History.

When in decline the great centers of civilization experienced falling birth rates and offset them with the importation of labor, labor which did not assimilate, but replaced, the problem being that the replacement was less civilized than what went before to the detriment of the civilization.

When Rome fell, we had the Dark Ages.

When we fall, what will be waiting to fill the void? Sharia?

So mexican immigrants are going to ultimately bring Sharia Law into America, somehow repealing the Constitution in the process.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4est_4est_Gump
History.

When in decline the great centers of civilization experienced falling birth rates and offset them with the importation of labor, labor which did not assimilate, but replaced, the problem being that the replacement was less civilized than what went before to the detriment of the civilization.

When Rome fell, we had the Dark Ages.

When we fall, what will be waiting to fill the void? SPOOKY SHARIA?

You really shouldn't modify other peoples posts.

 

[mercury14]

You really shouldn't modify other peoples posts.

I was doing it to make a point, doofus.

 

[garbage can]

I was doing it to make a point, doofus.

Modifying other peoples posts makes you look foolish and childish.

Your credibility drops to 3 pay-grades below whale shit when you modify a post.

Now you're known as a person who will modify another persons post.

 

[mercury14]

Modifying other peoples posts makes you look foolish and childish.

Your credibility drops to 3 pay-grades below whale shit when you modify a post.

Now you're known as a person who will modify another persons post.

No, deceitfully modifying posts is crappy. But inserting a Halloween word and highlighting it in giant colored letters to make it clear what I did isn't deceptive. I'd say nice try but you're failing abysmally again today.

My point is clearly that AJ finds Sharia law spooky. He's an Islamophobe who, like Ish and others here, believes that there's somehow a real possibility that Sharia Law will trump the Constitution of the United States. And if you ask them how that's possible they run like cowards from the question. Is there anything else you'd like to know about the point I made?

 

[garbage can]

No, deceitfully modifying posts is crappy. But inserting a Halloween word and highlighting it in giant colored letters to make it clear what I did isn't deceptive. I'd say nice try but you're failing abysmally again today.

I see, Halloween made you a fraudulent post changer.

My point is clearly that AJ finds Sharia law spooky. He's an Islamophobe who, like Ish and others here, believes that there's somehow a real possibility that Sharia Law will trump the Constitution of the United States. And if you ask them how that's possible they run like cowards from the question. Is there anything else you'd like to know about the point I made?

Lets see now, AJ and Ish are Islamophobes, and AJ is a racist.

I'm not sure what point you made.

 

[mercury14]

Lets see now, AJ and Ish are Islamophobes, and AJ is a racist.

I'm not sure what point you made.

Funny since you just typed my point.

 

[richard_daily]

Yes. Your stump of a son is better looking than me. You realize he is known as Barney Rubble by Lit women, right? I create jobs and hire people, something you and your idiot son have never had the pleasure of doing.

The US fertility rate is 2.06 children/woman. ZPG is 2.1 children/women.

Ishmael

Damn, you showed him ishmale!

Great response!

 

[RjThoughts]

Chicken Little screamed: The sky is falling, the sky is falling!
The Little Boy Cried Wolf!!

GB NeoCons cry: Sharia Law!! He's a Kenyan!! Sharia Law's coming you watch!!

 

[garbage can]

Yes. Your stump of a son is better looking than me. You realize he is known as Barney Rubble by Lit women, right? I create jobs and hire people, something you and your idiot son have never had the pleasure of doing.

The US fertility rate is 2.06 children/woman. ZPG is 2.1 children/women.

Ishmael

Damn, you showed him ishmale!

Great response!

God, you're an ignorant fuck

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[garbage can]

You're an unimaginative cloud of gaseous talking points. Nobody is saying that Sharia will trump the Constitution, we are saying it is repugnant to the Constitution. We are saying we want to prohibit its application in the affairs of civil society. There's a difference.

Merc has his own truths, and when necessary he manufactures his truths.

 

[Sean Renaud]

You're an unimaginative cloud of gaseous talking points. Nobody is saying that Sharia will trump the Constitution, we are saying it is repugnant to the Constitution. We are saying we want to prohibit its application in the affairs of civil society. There's a difference.

Unless you think it will Trump the Constitution there is no reason to bring it up at all. It's not going to be applied in our affairs (to any real extent) because it cannot be.

 

[mercury14]

You're an unimaginative cloud of gaseous talking points. Nobody is saying that Sharia will trump the Constitution, we are saying it is repugnant to the Constitution. We are saying we want to prohibit its application in the affairs of civil society. There's a difference.

You've never read Ishmael's or AJ's thoughts on it then. They both believe it's a real threat to take hold in the legal system even though it would take a Constitutional amendment for such a thing to occur.

Unless you think it will Trump the Constitution there is no reason to bring it up at all. It's not going to be applied in our affairs (to any real extent) because it cannot be.

Bingo.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Look at the sidebar.

 

[RjThoughts]

Look at the sidebar.

Don't cunfuse the NeoCons with facts!!!!

 

[garbage can]

My point is clearly that AJ finds Sharia law spooky. He's an Islamophobe who, like Ish and others here, believes that there's somehow a real possibility that Sharia Law will trump the Constitution of the United States. And if you ask them how that's possible they run like cowards from the question. Is there anything else you'd like to know about the point I made?

You've never read Ishmael's or AJ's thoughts on it then. They both believe it's a real threat to take hold in the legal system even though it would take a Constitutional amendment for such a thing to occur.

Nuff said

 

[mercury14]

Nuff said

Glad you agree I'm correct.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Sean]

I have my own thoughts on the matter, and the extent to which it may or may not be introduced into the civil society.

Bingo my ass. You two clowns have little forward vision. I remember when nobody thought illegal aliens would be allowed drivers licenses, or that cities in America would flout federal law and declare themselves "sanctuary cities" and thus outlaw governments in violation of the supremacy clause; or that national drug laws would be ignored by some states to placate politically correct vocal minorities. That fact is, these thigs were done because, although illegal, they have become political realities that must be addressed. If we continue to import social revolution it will have to be addressed as well. Anyone who thinks that Sharia law cannot be introduced into the civil society and change it forever by virtue of its political reality is naive.

You're unbelievably selective when it comes to the Tenth Amendment.

 

[unregistered]

 

[miles]

You really shouldn't modify other peoples posts.

He's such a dick.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I have my own thoughts on the matter, and the extent to which it may or may not be introduced into the civil society.

Bingo my ass. You two clowns have little forward vision. I remember when nobody thought illegal aliens would be allowed drivers licenses, or that cities in America would flout federal law and declare themselves "sanctuary cities" and thus outlaw governments in violation of the supremacy clause; or that national drug laws would be ignored by some states to placate politically correct vocal minorities. That fact is, these thigs were done because, although illegal, they have become political realities that must be addressed. If we continue to import social revolution it will have to be addressed as well. Anyone who thinks that Sharia law cannot be introduced into the civil society and change it forever by virtue of its political reality is naive.

Lets take your scenario as reality. If Islamic Extremists gather in large enough numbers to effect the electorate isn't that what Democracy is all about? Or is Democracy only a good idea when you get what you want and not actually good idea.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Lets take your scenario as reality. If Islamic Extremists gather in large enough numbers to effect the electorate isn't that what Democracy is all about? Or is Democracy only a good idea when you get what you want and not actually good idea.

Like spreading democracy to other countries. It's GREAT as long as they elect the people of which we approve!

Most seem to be just fine with Christians legislating their beliefs and morality onto the public at large whenever possible. But "Scary Muslims™"? No fucking way!

 

[KingOrfeo]

Nobody is more "selective" or shall we say "blind" when it comes to the Tenth Amendment than liberals.

The Supreme Court doesn't think much of it either.

The Tenth Amendment, which makes explicit the idea that the federal government is limited only to the powers granted in the Constitution, is often considered to be a truism. In United States v. Sprague (1931) the Supreme Court asserted that the amendment "added nothing to the [Constitution] as originally ratified."

States and local governments have occasionally attempted to assert exemption from various federal regulations, especially in the areas of labor and environmental controls, using the Tenth Amendment as a basis for their claim. An often-repeated quote, from United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100, 124 (1941), reads as follows:

The amendment states but a truism that all is retained which has not been surrendered. There is nothing in the history of its adoption to suggest that it was more than declaratory of the relationship between the national and state governments as it had been established by the Constitution before the amendment or that its purpose was other than to allay fears that the new national government might seek to exercise powers not granted, and that the states might not be able to exercise fully their reserved powers.