It appears that the court is going to pick up Dominic Bianchi et al. v. Brian E. Frosh et al. This is a challenge to Maryland's "Assault Weapon" ban. The ban was upheld by the district court but overturned by 4th Circuit Court. The State then requested an en banc panel which then re-upheld the ban.
The State's argument distills down to, "such weapons are only suitable for military service." First of all that is wholly incorrect. The US military, and military's world wide, have not fielded semi-automatic rifles since the mid 1950's. And even if they were suitable for military use, that is one of the whole purposes for the existence of the 2nd amendment to begin with. As a matter of fact there is a prior decision by the Supreme Court that basically states that very fact. (US v. Miller 1939)
If taken up it is expected that the court will overturn the 4th Circuits ruling. This, will in effect, render all such bans in all of the states unconstitutional.
The State's argument distills down to, "such weapons are only suitable for military service." First of all that is wholly incorrect. The US military, and military's world wide, have not fielded semi-automatic rifles since the mid 1950's. And even if they were suitable for military use, that is one of the whole purposes for the existence of the 2nd amendment to begin with. As a matter of fact there is a prior decision by the Supreme Court that basically states that very fact. (US v. Miller 1939)
If taken up it is expected that the court will overturn the 4th Circuits ruling. This, will in effect, render all such bans in all of the states unconstitutional.