Maybe size does matter in some cases

[infinity706]

I was explaining the whole prostate/G-spot thing to someone yesterday and I thought of something. Obviously, the actual prostate/parauretheral gland isn't sensitive or you'd feel it swell up and release its secretions at ejaculation. Of course, there's also supposed to be an A-spot, up near the cervix, as well. Obviously, there's no way I could test it currently, but I guess it's possible that they're both related to this big nerve in the area, called the pudendal nerve. It's basically the sexual brain and connects directly to the spine. It branches off in the pelvis to provide nerve endings to the clitoris/penis, vulva/scrotum, perineum, and anus. It's also known that direct stimulation of the pudendal nerve causes orgasmic response. (tested in cadavers)

If that's the case, though, it would explain why some women like some really long cocks or toys, poking up near the cervix and why only some women seem to have G-spots, despite the fact that all women have paraurethral glands. Maybe the problem is needing to have a big enough gland to poke the pudendal nerve. Otherwise, you're just poking the hell out of the bladder, since it's only a little above the gland. It would also explain why prostate stimulation tends to work fine in pre orgasmic guys, but a lot of women need to orgasm a few times, first, to get it really swelled up. Afterall, guys tend to have a much larger gland.

It would be testable in an MRI machine. It shows soft tissues and there's been studies where people had sex in them. You'd just have to get a good view of that pudendal nerve and watch what happens.

 

[TeaforMe]

I was explaining the whole prostate/G-spot thing to someone yesterday and I thought of something. Obviously, the actual prostate/parauretheral gland isn't sensitive or you'd feel it swell up and release its secretions at ejaculation. Of course, there's also supposed to be an A-spot, up near the cervix, as well. Obviously, there's no way I could test it currently, but I guess it's possible that they're both related to this big nerve in the area, called the pudendal nerve. It's basically the sexual brain and connects directly to the spine. It branches off in the pelvis to provide nerve endings to the clitoris/penis, vulva/scrotum, perineum, and anus. It's also known that direct stimulation of the pudendal nerve causes orgasmic response. (tested in cadavers)

If that's the case, though, it would explain why some women like some really long cocks or toys, poking up near the cervix and why only some women seem to have G-spots, despite the fact that all women have paraurethral glands. Maybe the problem is needing to have a big enough gland to poke the pudendal nerve. Otherwise, you're just poking the hell out of the bladder, since it's only a little above the gland. It would also explain why prostate stimulation tends to work fine in pre orgasmic guys, but a lot of women need to orgasm a few times, first, to get it really swelled up. Afterall, guys tend to have a much larger gland.

It would be testable in an MRI machine. It shows soft tissues and there's been studies where people had sex in them. You'd just have to get a good view of that pudendal nerve and watch what happens.

That is very interesting. I also wonder if curved cocks, regardless of size are better adept at reaching the proper g spot location. I know for me, I have a tipped uterus, which makes it sit differently. I noticed a curved cock felt better than a larger straight cock.

 

[infinity706]

Yeah, curved would definately help, considering that's what you do with your fingers to stroke the G-spot area or the prostate area in guys. Of course, they make curved toys if you don't have the luxury of a partner to do it for you.

 

[KarenM411]

Ive always enjoyed a guy with an upward curve, while i find the science of it pretty unsexy id be curious to see what happens to my glands in an mri machine

 

[bailadora]

<snip> It would be testable in an MRI machine.

How's this possible? I've had to have a couple of MRIs done for other reasons and distinctly remember being told to stay as still as possible. It seems to me the couple would have to go at it and then stop and hold the position to be scanned.

It's hard enough to stay completely still when it's just ONE person. I can't imagine having to do it while naked and all hot and bothered!

 

[infinity706]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJUg7GJTZEM&feature=related
Here's a video of some of the MRI porn. It's from a Nobel prize winning study. I can't really tell you how it works, though, because I'm not a doctor. I can tell you the guy has a huge cock, though, because he's pounding the hell out of her uterus. Of course, it could be that the hospital's MRI machine is outdated compared to some of the stuff they use in research. Those things have price tags like new cars and you don't need to upgrade unless there's something special you can't do with the current one.

 

[firenzi]

How's this possible? I've had to have a couple of MRIs done for other reasons and distinctly remember being told to stay as still as possible.

The only thing I can think of is that maybe for diagnostic purposes, it's important to stay still so they can see as clearly as possible whatever it is they are imaging. But for a sex study, it would be different because the action itself is what they're studying?...idk, I'm just a layman

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJUg7...eature=related
Here's a video of some of the MRI porn.

Haha, I loved that! And it's fascinating to see our bodies working, too.

 

[infinity706]

Well, if you're looking for something tiny, staying still would be important, anyway, since an MRI is like slicing you in half at a particular point. Medical personnel only have so much time per patient and they probably only have one MRI machine.