Can I just say I'm tired of this book being interpreted as a warning against the the dangers of science? What if it's about the creators abandonment of his (intentional for many reasons) creation? Be it god or man? I can't be the only one. I'll stop here and see what happens.
Mary Shelleys' 'Frankenstein'.
- Thread starter Statius
- Start date
onehitwanda
Venatrix Lacrimosal
- Joined
- May 20, 2013
- Posts
- 4,569
Sir, this is a Wendy's.
StillStunned
Mr Sticky
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2023
- Posts
- 9,872
I live in fear of one day being eaten alive by my WIP folder, as it grows and grows and consumes all around it.
NuclearFairy
Head Scritcher
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2023
- Posts
- 1,297
I've never read the story, so I can't say for sure, but your interpretation seems on tract.
It's like how everyone just assumes that the moral of the tortoise and the hare is that slow and steady wins the race. When really the moral is, it doesn't matter how talented you are, if you don't take it seriously then the guy with no talent but lots of dedication is going to get the job done while you fail to finish.
It's like how everyone just assumes that the moral of the tortoise and the hare is that slow and steady wins the race. When really the moral is, it doesn't matter how talented you are, if you don't take it seriously then the guy with no talent but lots of dedication is going to get the job done while you fail to finish.
THBGato
Litaddict
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2024
- Posts
- 1,363
The thing about Literature is: read it how you want to.
e.g.
Marxist: It's how the wealthy play with the bodies of the proletariat, then deny responsibility.
Feminist: Men are jealous of women's ability to bring forth life. As usual, when the men get bored of their toys, it's the women who suffer the most.
New Historicist view: It's about a nineteen year old girl trying to beat the big literary boys in a ghost story contest. Arguably, she wins.
Freudian: When confronted with what we most desire, most people will deny it and will go to great pains to do so.
FrancesScott
Like a virgin
- Joined
- May 15, 2025
- Posts
- 728
Monster porn: Well do I have to spell it out?
StillStunned
Mr Sticky
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2023
- Posts
- 9,872
Outdoor enthusiasts: don't try to hike across the Arctic without the proper gear.
lovecraft68
Bad Doggie
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2009
- Posts
- 46,191
I saw it more as the warning for man not to play God, even though I don't believe in God, most do, especially back then.
Sometimes I try not to overanalyze everything, its a great book written by a woman in a time where many men didn't think they should be able to read-which was part of why it was initially published anonymously in 1818 before she put her name to it in 1831. It's more than a book, it's iconic for many reasons.
Just look at this thread, 200 years later and still being discussed.
BTW AI is our Frankenstein, and it will kill all of us.
Have a great Sunday!
Sometimes I try not to overanalyze everything, its a great book written by a woman in a time where many men didn't think they should be able to read-which was part of why it was initially published anonymously in 1818 before she put her name to it in 1831. It's more than a book, it's iconic for many reasons.
Just look at this thread, 200 years later and still being discussed.
BTW AI is our Frankenstein, and it will kill all of us.
Have a great Sunday!
Jackie.Hikaru
See you space cowboy
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2019
- Posts
- 1,269
I will only say on the subject that in @Areala-chan ’s Latest story there’s a quip about Frankenstein that was really great. And the story was really great. That is all.
Thank you for your consideration on the matter.
Thank you for your consideration on the matter.
ShelbyDawn57
Fae Princess
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
- Posts
- 3,939
Um, I'm guessing you didn't realize that those two things are not mutually exclusive and that the book is about both and a little more. Throw in unchecked ambition and the subsequent isolation and you get the complete picture. Good call out though. And @onehitwanda, can I have a medium Frosty, please?
MrPixel
Just a Regular Guy
- Joined
- May 12, 2020
- Posts
- 5,930
I'm going to ask, kinda sorta suspecting the answer... by whom?
UsuallyPresent
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2019
- Posts
- 9,902
Ever dip your fries in a frosty? Num!
Back to the main thread:
In modern terms, and from my personal opinion, Shelly could probably have used a better editor with a handy stock of red pens/ink. That story could have been told in a much, much more concise form. But - I don't know enough of 1800s literature to have an opinion on how it was received at that point - clearly it was more of a hit than many of its contemporary works.
Then again, we tend to have the attention span of gnats. One of the downsides of info overloads. 1800 had somewhere under a hundred novels published in the UK according to Goog, whereas 2020 had somewhere over 180,000. We could be said to be drowning in content.
Meekly_Anna
Combat Pixie
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2024
- Posts
- 952
The book explores the consequences of humanity's ambition and the pursuit of knowledge without considering the ethical implications. It's about hubris.
While Frankenstein is often seen as a critique of science, it's more accurate to describe it as a critique of the scientist. Shelley isn't against scientific discovery itself but rather the irresponsible application of it. Victor's pursuit of knowledge is obsessive and solitary, lacking any ethical or social consideration. He doesn't consult others, nor does he think about the potential consequences of his actions. His ultimate failure is not a failure of science but a failure of morality and responsibility. The novel warns that when scientists become detached from their humanity and their creations, the results can be catastrophic. It's a critique of the mindset of the person wielding the scientific power, not the power itself. It's a timeless warning that the pursuit of knowledge must be tempered with compassion and responsibility.
While Frankenstein is often seen as a critique of science, it's more accurate to describe it as a critique of the scientist. Shelley isn't against scientific discovery itself but rather the irresponsible application of it. Victor's pursuit of knowledge is obsessive and solitary, lacking any ethical or social consideration. He doesn't consult others, nor does he think about the potential consequences of his actions. His ultimate failure is not a failure of science but a failure of morality and responsibility. The novel warns that when scientists become detached from their humanity and their creations, the results can be catastrophic. It's a critique of the mindset of the person wielding the scientific power, not the power itself. It's a timeless warning that the pursuit of knowledge must be tempered with compassion and responsibility.
MrHereWriting
Mr. Here
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2019
- Posts
- 364
UsuallyPresent
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2019
- Posts
- 9,902
Sounds kinda like Adam, the constructed being from Buffy the Vampire Slayer TV series.
Adam "Scout's Honor!"
(I forget which protagonist) "You're a Boy Scout?"
Adam "Well, parts of me."
So - a rigger's hand, a masseur's eye, a masochist's back, a pegging aficionado's butt, a spice connoisseur's digestive tract.... Lots of options!
StillStunned
Mr Sticky
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2023
- Posts
- 9,872
UsuallyPresent
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2019
- Posts
- 9,902
I didn't finish my thoughts on my reasoning on purpose. One to get others thoughts, two I didn't want to go down rabbit holes right off the bat. I was simply referring to the overall theme of abandonment in the book, and the possibility, probability, that that is what Shelly felt throughout her life.
Oops
ShelbyDawn57
Fae Princess
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
- Posts
- 3,939
Always!!! I think I know where I'm going for lunch.
StillStunned
Mr Sticky
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2023
- Posts
- 9,872
ShelbyDawn57
Fae Princess
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
- Posts
- 3,939
Fine. I fixed my redic spelling error. No fun though. Maybe I like looking like a moron?
SteelPoint
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2014
- Posts
- 922
There still remains the problem of "Shelly", though, right..?
I mean: if we're not going to show ourselves up as genuine morons...
I mean: if we're not going to show ourselves up as genuine morons...
Similar threads
