LJ_Reloaded
バクスター の
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Posts
- 21,217
His friend was accused of rape by the same woman. Looks to me like he's out for revenge.
If so I hope this fool gets busted.
https://reason.com/blog/2018/05/11/cincinnati-rape-title-ix-doe-roe-sex/
But on the bright side we just gained one more woman in favor of universities not engaging in hasty punishments without due process. I hope she wins this fight, for everyone's sake.
If so I hope this fool gets busted.
https://reason.com/blog/2018/05/11/cincinnati-rape-title-ix-doe-roe-sex/
Both were drunk and only one got busted? Uh, haven't we been down that road before? Yeah, this case against her needs to go in the trash bin.The University of Cincinnati suspended a female student for allegedly engaging in nonconsensual sex with a male student who claimed he was too drunk at the time to approve the encounter.
The fact that this case involves a male accuser ("John Doe") and a female aggressor ("Jane Roe") makes it unusual among Title IX complaints. (Title IX is the federal statute that forbids sex discrimination in schools.) But the female student's lawsuit against Cincinnati—which accuses the university of violating her due process rights—reveals something even odder: Roe had previously filed a sexual misconduct complaint against one of Doe's friends.
Roe's lawsuit, then, suggests that Doe filed the complaint against Roe as a kind of revenge for getting his friend in trouble. (I have an alternative theory, but I'll save that for the end.)
"On information and belief, John Doe was motivated to file a Title IX Complaint in retaliation for a prior Title X Complaint Jane Roe had filed against his friend," according to the suit.
Roe also contends that it was ridiculous to find her guilty of nonconsensual sex because of Doe's drunkenness, but not find Doe guilty too: Roe was also drunk at the time, so under the rules she was just as unable to consent to sex as he was. While this might seem like a paradox—how can two young people rape each other?—it would actually be a straightforward application of affirmative consent, which requires all participants in a sexual encounter to proactively obtain freely given and unambiguous consent before proceeding.
But on the bright side we just gained one more woman in favor of universities not engaging in hasty punishments without due process. I hope she wins this fight, for everyone's sake.