Legal rights for same sex couples in UK

sexy-girl

sacrilegious
Joined
Apr 18, 2001
Posts
19,584
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2548321.stm


cool ... it's not specifically marriage but legally it will equal the same as marriage which is very cool ... and marriage is more of a religious thing anyway


i think having this sort of thing in place is excellent though gay couples will have all the rights and practical good points of a conventional marriage


its not all gone through yet but i hope it will soon
 
yeah, read that today.
Britain has a long way to go to achieve the kinds of freedoms that same sex partners have in Holland, Denmark and Norway, but hey, it's a step in the right direction for all our 'alternative lifestyle' chums!;)
 
Coolville said:
yeah, read that today.
Britain has a long way to go to achieve the kinds of freedoms that same sex partners have in Holland, Denmark and Norway, but hey, it's a step in the right direction for all our 'alternative lifestyle' chums!;)


thats very true we are way behind ... but things are changing very quickly and its good


blue we're see :D
 
I've always thought that people should simply be allowed to register a "domestic beneficiary" that would have the authority to make medical decisions, get the insurance, pensions, & other benefits, as well as tax advantages ,just to grant equal rights before & after the death of a partner/ sibling, etc.

It shouldn't be limited to sexual relationships.
 
im not quite sure how that would work patient1 but i guess i haven't thought about it


but i do think its a pretty basic thing to ask that the love of my life be considered as important as my family members and as important as if it was a conventional relationship


when someone asks does this person have any next of kin and lisa wouldn't be considered as a next of kin i think thats just so wrong
 
I guess I am a "traitor"

:rolleyes:

While I congratulate the movement of Gay/Lesbian/Bi/TS rights....I just don't feel very active....like just because I am Bi that I should jump on the bandwagon and say "marry who you please!" but then I don't believe in restricting the rights of anyone....what ever happened to being equal in the eyes of men (humankind implied) ???

I belong to a GLBTS pride group...but for me its more of a support thing ....I guess we all join for different reasons....*shrug*

The bottom line:

1) No one should be refused any rights....even the right to marry...
2) I personally don't get involved in activist thingies...it's just not in my character...but I do hope for some middle ground between both sides....this is afterall about love not politics...
3) I just felt I needed to voice my 2.5 cents on this issue...sorry if this is a hijack...it was not my intention. :rose:
 
your not a traitor at all silverluna


i've been active in some activist things :) but none at all to do with my sexuality i've never gone on a gay march i've never campaigned for gay rights ... infact the only real life gay friend i've met is my girlfriend :) ... but that doesn't stop me from welcoming this


the only gay thing i have is a bag that has a little logo of gay pride on it but i don't even wear it out very often at all
 
sexy-girl said:
your not a traitor at all silverluna


i've been active in some activist things :) but none at all to do with my sexuality i've never gone on a gay march i've never campaigned for gay rights ... infact the only real life gay friend i've met is my girlfriend :) ... but that doesn't stop me from welcoming this


the only gay thing i have is a bag that has a little logo of gay pride on it but i don't even wear it out very often at all


*sigh* I feel somewhat better...ever since my "homophobia definition " av...I have been a bit skittish...lol
 
the only thing i've been an activist about in anyway is the environment ... to tell you the truth i don't really want to go on a gay march or anything ... it just doesn't seem like me :)

but i can still support what they do :)
 
sexy-girl said:
im not quite sure how that would work patient1 but i guess i haven't thought about it


but i do think its a pretty basic thing to ask that the love of my life be considered as important as my family members and as important as if it was a conventional relationship


when someone asks does this person have any next of kin and lisa wouldn't be considered as a next of kin i think thats just so wrong

I agree with you- I'm just saying a person should be able to designate a member of their household, too.

For example- if you & Lisa were sisters or cousins spending your lives together, NOT lovers, you should still be able to have the same priviledges as a married couple if you registered as domestic associates.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top