All you have demonstrated is the suppression of Professor Rushton's assertions, not their rebuttal. I myself have substantiated Rushton's assertions by posting facts I documented about racial differences in average intelligence, and in crime and sexual behavior.
You misuse the word "suppression". At worst, they are minimizing.
Efforts were made to fire Professor Rushton from his college, even though he had tenure. That is suppression.
Was he fired?
This is what Western had to say about him:
You did what now? (In answer to the red)
Well, attempted suppression would be an attempt to fire him. That's not what douche is asserting
He was never fired, and he left Western prior to 2000 on his own volition. The papers were withdrawn by Western in 2006-2007 I think. Why Western took so long to issue a "statement", I can only surmise that people like out Johndoe here started a major revival of this in say 2019 or so.
Fortunately he was not.
Thank you for confirming that he wasn't suppressed.
No one has ever created an environment where blacks did not tend to perform significantly worse than whites and Orientals. That alone is powerful evidence of genetic differences. I often am told about how Rushton's methodology is flawed, but no one explains how it is flawed. Until someone finds a way to close the race gap in academic performance and performance on mental aptitude test scores genetics will remain the most plausible explanation.
*chuckles*
And what study showed this to be true?
Race Differences In Average
Trans-Racial Adoption Studies. Race differences in IQ remain following adoption by White middle class parents. East Asians grow to average higher IQs than Whites while Blacks score lower. The Minnesota Trans-Racial Adoption Study followed children to age 17 and found race differences were even greater than at age 7: White children, 106; Mixed-Race children, 99; and Black children, 89.
And once again you circle back to Rushton. Who I have posted several rebuttals against his work, and how the scientific community as a majority view, has stated his paper is flawed.
Got it. One description of a study without any known aspects of that study.
Professor Rushton was a brave man who risked his career in order to tell the truth about intrinsic racial differences. He was denounced but never disproved. His assertions are obvious to anyone who has had extensive experience with the three major races. I have documented the truth of his assertions on this website. I tire of repeating myself.
He was a racist, but he did stand up in front and not hide that, unlike you.
Actually he was, and today I posted three of those denunciations, complete with links to the papers that disseminated his flawed work and books, such as this one...(so that is now four today, alone).
I have had extensive experience with lots of people, of all cultural backgrounds, not once I have i noticed anything about any of them that would follow the bullshit you like to spout.
No (*chuckles*) you have not. What you have done is recycle three people, and their papers and/or professional work. The prime being Rushton.
But you never stop, you repeat the same old bullshit when confronted with the reality that your hero was wrong. Just stop posting this crap,and no one would care what the fuck you think or feel.
I am not doubting what Rushton said, I am saying what he said was wrong, as are the experts in the field who have dissected his work. You can keep your head burred in the sand, I don't give a shit what you think. But I will call out and prove to anyone else reading your bullshit, that what you claim and Rushton produced was wrong.
Explain using your own words why Professor Rushton was mistaken. I have explained using my own words, using the internet only to document my factual assertions that what he said is correct.
