Ladies, it's time to play Check Your Privilege!

[LJ_Reloaded]

"Check Your Privilege"

A now famous meme spread across the world of social justice activism by radical feminists and manfems/manginas, "Check Your Privilege" is code speak for "men benefit from misogyny". It is a war cry that galvanizes even average women into a frenzy of male bashing and other displays of fanaticism.

Yet, while this meme has no problem rallying women and rousing feminists to war, it is only almost as capable of stirring up a hornet's nest as when someone calls upon women to... you guessed it...

Check Your Privilege.



Here are some privileges that are granted women, which women will never actually deny that they have, but they will swarm in a blood rage if they're called upon to recognize them, much less give them up.

1. In 2008, a law was passed in England and Wales that allowed long-term domestic violence victims who killed their abuser to be charged with the lesser charge of manslaughter, but this only applies to women. Disregarding the fact that women are just as violent in domestic partnerships as well as dismissing the victims in domestic violence that are gay and trans.

2. In most states, a woman can name any man she likes as the father, he gets a letter in the mail, if he does not prove he isn’t the father within a set deadline (suppose the letter gets lost by the USPS?), he is now the father and must pay. He cannot contest it. And DNA tests to prove paternity are not considered proof by the courts. California only recently addressed this in 2004 with a law extending this challenge deadline to 2 years. http://www.dna-testing-paternity.com/child-support/paternity-fraud-still-an-issue

Advocates said that, the California law passed the Legislature with virtually unanimous support because it was a compromise bill. A stronger “paternity fraud” bill had been offered in the state Senate, according to lawyer Marc Angelucci, a leader of the National Coalition of Free Men. However, the Senate bill, was opposed by California child- support officials as well as feminist groups who viewed it as a “get-out-of-jail-free card.”

In short, feminists know that men who are not the father of the child get accused of being the father, and they have taken an active part in keeping some shred of the status quo. Nobody can deny this. It's a money grab by women. Check your privilege.

3. Women are treated better in most aspects of the legal system. For instance, women receive lighter sentences and a higher chance of acquittal, simply for being women.

4. Men comprise 95% of workplace deaths. No feminist group, and hardly any pro-capitalist organization, has ever pushed to fix this. Yet society is totally up in arms about women earning less than men.

5. Men who are falsely accused of rape can have their names published and their lives ruined even if they are not convicted or charged - their accuser is protected and is likely to face no punishment, or a light one. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...-false-rape-claim-may-proceed-judge-says.html

6. The majority of homeless are men. More than women and children COMBINED.

7. Selective service. Even though women can now serve in combat roles, they're exempt from registering.


Stop dodging the issue, feminists. None of these examples are factually wrong. These are examples of the privileges you get for being female. Check your privilege.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Here is something about prison sentences. If I had to, I could probably find more from more reliable sources.http://www.google.com/#output=searc...96,d.cGE&fp=fa02d54ba0a1d352&biw=1366&bih=564

 

[badbabysitter]

1. In 2013, India passed a law stating that it was now illegal to rape your wife, if she was under the age of 15. If she's over 15, you can still rape her legally.


2. In most states, a rapist can sue for custody rights of the child of the rape..even from jail

3. Women receive lighter sentences for most crimes...except when wives murders their husbands..they in fact get longer sentences then husbands killing wives.

4. One third of all women that are murdered, are murdered by their male partners..leading to harsher sentences for men as a deterrent..which doesnt work.

5. Only 20% of all sexual assault charges reach a courtroom, due to the nature of the evidence in question and in many cases breaks down in to a " he said, she said" version of testimony which is far from reliable

6. The vast majority of homeless centres are male only

7. The last time the draft was in effect women were barred from serving in the military. If there should be outrage at this, it should be directed to those who barred them. Also, there doesnt seem to be a big movement to reintroduce the draft or to fight it..so this entire last arguement is painfully weak


No one's dodging anything..you just have selective outrage

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

1. In 2013, India passed a law stating that it was now illegal to rape your wife, if she was under the age of 15. If she's over 15, you can still rape her legally.


2. In most states, a rapist can sue for custody rights of the child of the rape..even from jail

3. Women receive lighter sentences for most crimes...except when wives murders their husbands..they in fact get longer sentences then husbands killing wives.

4. One third of all women that are murdered, are murdered by their male partners..leading to harsher sentences for men as a deterrent..which doesnt work.

5. Only 20% of all sexual assault charges reach a courtroom, due to the nature of the evidence in question and in many cases breaks down in to a " he said, she said" version of testimony which is far from reliable

6. The vast majority of homeless centres are male only

7. The last time the draft was in effect women were barred from serving in the military. If there should be outrage at this, it should be directed to those who barred them. Also, there doesnt seem to be a big movement to reintroduce the draft or to fight it..so this entire last arguement is painfully weak


No one's dodging anything..you just have selective outrage

You dodged everything I said. You did not even so much as claim one thing I said, was untrue.

Check your privilege.

 

[Boxlicker101]

1. In 2013, India passed a law stating that it was now illegal to rape your wife, if she was under the age of 15. If she's over 15, you can still rape her legally.

Well that's progress. India is one of the worst places for a woman to be.

2. In most states, a rapist can sue for custody rights of the child of the rape..even from jail

That's really not all that unreasonable, but how often would a man win such a case if he is in jail? If it's a date rape or statutory rape case, the man might even be a better parent.

3. Women receive lighter sentences for most crimes...except when wives murders their husbands..they in fact get longer sentences then husbands killing wives.

I suspect you are comparing grapefruits to tangerines. To compare oranges to oranges, do men convicted of first degree murder of their wives get lighter sentences than women who are convicted of first degree murder of their husbands?

4. One third of all women that are murdered, are murdered by their male partners..leading to harsher sentences for men as a deterrent..which doesnt work.

5. Only 20% of all sexual assault charges reach a courtroom, due to the nature of the evidence in question and in many cases breaks down in to a " he said, she said" version of testimony which is far from reliable.

If a person is accused of rape but the evidence is flimsy, that person should not be dconvicted and maybe shouldn't even be charged.

6. The vast majority of homeless centres are male only

The vast majority of homeless people are men. There are also shelters for women and children, which are much more comfortable than those for men only.

7. The last time the draft was in effect women were barred from serving in the military. If there should be outrage at this, it should be directed to those who barred them. Also, there doesnt seem to be a big movement to reintroduce the draft or to fight it..so this entire last arguement is painfully weak


No one's dodging anything..you just have selective outrage

That last statement is just not true. There have been women serving in the military as far back as WW2, although not in combat. The draft ended long after that, but men (and not women) are still reqired to register in case it has to be reinstated.

 

[badbabysitter]

You dodged everything I said. You did not even so much as claim one thing I said, was untrue.

Check your privilege.

Really.. so you are still convinced it was a feminist plot for women to be barred from serving in the military?

really?


really?

check the space between your ears...it's missing something

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Really.. so you are still convinced it was a feminist plot for women to be barred from serving in the military?

Obviously you are too dim to understand the difference between "feminist plot" and "privilege". I consider not having to go to war a privilege. Why? Because it means you're out of danger.

Now check your privilege.

Oh and it appears Boxlicker101 just handed you your ass about this military service thing...

 

[badbabysitter]

Well that's progress. India is one of the worst places for a woman to be.


But it's okay for LT to make a comment on a foreign law..but I can't? oh, thats nice to know


That's really not all that unreasonable, but how often would a man win such a case if he is in jail? If it's a date rape or statutory rape case, the man might even be a better parent.

Parents can still get visitation rights in jail for one.

And how is date rape or raping a 13 year old somehow better then other kinds of rape? Is this a " legitmate" rape?


I suspect you are comparing grapefruits to tangerines. To compare oranges to oranges, do men convicted of first degree murder of their wives get lighter sentences than women who are convicted of first degree murder of their husbands?

That's not exactly what I said. Sentences are handed down on precedents, and unfortuantely alot is gender based. For example... women often get custody of kids more because the majority of dead beat parents are male. It's not fair to good men who want thier kids... just precedent shows men are more likely to ditch kids. How that translates here is that men are more to commit homicides in the moment, and women are more prone to planning..hence the stronger sentences


If a person is accused of rape but the evidence is flimsy, that person should not be dconvicted and maybe shouldn't even be charged.

Which is the way it currently works. Sadly though, thius does not mean those assaults dont occur


The vast majority of homeless people are men. There are also shelters for women and children, which are much more comfortable than those for men only.

That's hearsay at best. I work in a directly related field. I have seen incredible shelters for men and shitty ones for women, conversely I've seen fantastic women's shelters and and horrible men's shelters. It all depends on funding and what organization is running it


That last statement is just not true. There have been women serving in the military as far back as WW2, although not in combat. The draft ended long after that, but men (and not women) are still reqired to register in case it has to be reinstated.

The women " serving " in the military in WW2 were secretaries and nurses..have you not heard of WAC? Even years and years after the war when they were finally allowed get near the asction, they still werent allowed to fire a gun.

see above

 

[badbabysitter]

Obviously you are too dim to understand the difference between "feminist plot" and "privilege". I consider not having to go to war a privilege. Why? Because it means you're out of danger.

Now check your privilege.

Oh and it appears Boxlicker101 just handed you your ass about this military service thing...

because " privilege" is your gender politics meme of the month... there was " gender feminism", and " hypergamy", and " misandry"...the list goes on and on...paint it up all you want, it still means the same damn thing

so you agree with him that nurses and secretaries were allowed to fight ..good to hear


he handed me my ass solely so that he could kiss it better for such a poorly researched statement he made

 

[LillyO]

That's really not all that unreasonable, but how often would a man win such a case if he is in jail? If it's a date rape or statutory rape case, the man might even be a better parent.

Parents can still get visitation rights in jail for one.

And how is date rape or raping a 13 year old somehow better then other kinds of rape? Is this a " legitmate" rape?

Amazing isn't it?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

because " privilege" is your gender politics meme of the month... there was " gender feminism", and " hypergamy", and " misandry"...the list goes on and on...paint it up all you want, it still means the same damn thing

And every last bit of it is error-free.

You never once even tried to attack the examples of female privilege that I cited. Not even one.

so you agree with him that nurses and secretaries were allowed to fight ..good to hear

Tell that to the nurses who were taken POW by the Japanese. You can remove your foot from your mouth now. Or not. Foot fetishes are allowed here.

 

[badbabysitter]

And every last bit of it is error-free.

You never once even tried to attack the examples of female privilege that I cited. Not even one.


Tell that to the nurses who were taken POW by the Japanese. You can remove your foot from your mouth now. Or not. Foot fetishes are allowed here.

you have tonnes of errors... there is a veritable phone book of people that have pointed out your fallacies on here... but you scream at them and ignore what they say

and you never once even tried to attack the examples of injustice to women that I cited.

Not even one

 

[blackleggings]

Every time I see this thread I think it should be "Check Your Panties."

 

[MatthewVett]

It's like watching a pigeon in a Skinner Box. He once saw that someone said "Check your privilege" and that it produced a desired effect, but he has no idea how or why, so he just keeps trying, like a superstition, hoping to produce the same effect through incantation of the magic words... Fascinating. I think this is how cargo cults start.

 

[Pairaclities]

It's like watching a pigeon in a Skinner Box. He once saw that someone said "Check your privilege" and that it produced a desired effect, but he has no idea how or why, so he just keeps trying, like a superstition, hoping to produce the same effect through incantation of the magic words... Fascinating. I think this is how cargo cults start.

Yes, for sure. You would think the hamster wheel would need new bearings by now. I can't imagine a life with such narrow mindedness and anger. Serious self esteem issues at LJR's house

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

It's like watching a pigeon in a Skinner Box. He once saw that someone said "Check your privilege" and that it produced a desired effect, but he has no idea how or why, so he just keeps trying, like a superstition, hoping to produce the same effect through incantation of the magic words... Fascinating. I think this is how cargo cults start.

Well, at least you don't deny that I'm actually correct in what I say.

You hate the message, but like the other radfems and manginas here, you don't dare try to refute it.

My point STILL stands completely uncontested.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Yes, for sure. You would think the hamster wheel would need new bearings by now. I can't imagine a life with such narrow mindedness and anger. Serious self esteem issues at LJR's house

You post this nonsense because you are desperate to get laid. You'll do anything to grovel for some pussy. And again you don't deny that my points are correct. You wouldn't do that and risk getting hurt like the last time you tried that with me. Lesson learned, I suppose.

Did your rant win you any pussy points with your favorite radfems today, dude?

 

[Pairaclities]

You post this nonsense because you are desperate to get laid. You'll do anything to grovel for some pussy. And again you don't deny that my points are correct. You wouldn't do that and risk getting hurt like the last time you tried that with me. Lesson learned, I suppose.

Did your rant win you any pussy points with your favorite radfems today, dude?

Feel better now?

 

[Pairaclities]

Also, Fuck are you stupid.

 

[LiFeNdEaTh]

interesting..

 

[badbabysitter]

Well, at least you don't deny that I'm actually correct in what I say.

You hate the message, but like the other radfems and manginas here, you don't dare try to refute it.

My point STILL stands completely uncontested.

actually your points have been contested multiple times..you just choose to ignore it when it happens

I dont deny you have salient points...but you do deny any other person in the world that has salient points if they dare to disagree with you

 

[badbabysitter]

Tell that to the nurses who were taken POW by the Japanese

Imagine how many less of them there would have been if they were allowed to carry a gun

 

[Boxlicker101]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101
Well that's progress. India is one of the worst places for a woman to be.

But it's okay for LT to make a comment on a foreign law..but I can't? oh, thats nice to know

That's really not all that unreasonable, but how often would a man win such a case if he is in jail? If it's a date rape or statutory rape case, the man might even be a better parent.

Parents can still get visitation rights in jail for one.

And how is date rape or raping a 13 year old somehow better then other kinds of rape? Is this a " legitmate" rape?

I suspect you are comparing grapefruits to tangerines. To compare oranges to oranges, do men convicted of first degree murder of their wives get lighter sentences than women who are convicted of first degree murder of their husbands?

That's not exactly what I said. Sentences are handed down on precedents, and unfortuantely alot is gender based. For example... women often get custody of kids more because the majority of dead beat parents are male. It's not fair to good men who want thier kids... just precedent shows men are more likely to ditch kids. How that translates here is that men are more to commit homicides in the moment, and women are more prone to planning..hence the stronger sentences

If a person is accused of rape but the evidence is flimsy, that person should not be dconvicted and maybe shouldn't even be charged.

Which is the way it currently works. Sadly though, thius does not mean those assaults dont occur

The vast majority of homeless people are men. There are also shelters for women and children, which are much more comfortable than those for men only.

That's hearsay at best. I work in a directly related field. I have seen incredible shelters for men and shitty ones for women, conversely I've seen fantastic women's shelters and and horrible men's shelters. It all depends on funding and what organization is running it

That last statement is just not true. There have been women serving in the military as far back as WW2, although not in combat. The draft ended long after that, but men (and not women) are still reqired to register in case it has to be reinstated.

The women " serving " in the military in WW2 were secretaries and nurses..have you not heard of WAC? Even years and years after the war when they were finally allowed get near the asction, they still werent allowed to fire a gun.


India is a bad place for a woman to be. It's not as bad as Saudi Arabia or Iran or some other places, and not as bad as it was at one time, but a bad place nevertheless. I am not disputing that.

Parents are usually allowed to visit their offspring in jail, but what does that have to do with what we are discussing? It would be very unusual for a parent to be furloughed to visit his child. It might happen, but it would be unusual.

Where does this 13 year old come from all of a sudden? In CA, sex with a person under 18 is illegal. If a 20 year old man impregnated his 17 year old girl friend, he could go to prison for statutory rape, even if the sex was consensual. If the new mother decide to give the baby up for adoption, the father should have every right to sue to prevent it and ask to be granted custody of his baby.

Sometimes date rape can be just as violent as stranger rape, or the woman might have been given some kind of drug. In other cases, the man might not take her objections seriously, or the couple might both be drunk and get carried away. In the latter case, only the man would usually be accused of rape, which doesn't seem fair, but such is life. In any event, if she become pregnant from such an encounter and doesn't want the baby, why should the man not be granted custody?

BTW, there is no such thing as a "legitimate" rape. Did you mean to say "genuine" or "actual" or some similar word.

This is EXACTLY what you said:

:

3. Women receive lighter sentences for most crimes...except when wives murders their husbands..they in fact get longer sentences then husbands killing wives.

And, when I expressed my disagreement by pointing out the different levels of murder, you just blithered about deadbeat dads and custody. I think this is sometimes called "moving the goalposts."

Your statement about deadbeats was pretty obvious. Of course there will be more deadbeat dads, because the mother can't deny parenthood, and she can't skip town when she finds out she is pregnant, while a man can do either. That's not to say he should, just that it is possible.

This is a rather inane statement you made: "women often get custody of kids more because the majority of dead beat parents are male"

That's actually a pretty circular statement. I mean, a parent does not become a deadbeat parent until after he or she is denied custody. If a person has custody but does not see to it the child is supported, that's a lot more serious than being a deadbeat parent.

When I say a man will be convicted of rape on flimsy evidence, I am especially referring to a case where he says it was consensual and she says it was not. He will almost always be convicted just on her say-so, even if there is no evidence of violence, such as torn clothing, injuries, people who heard her screaming for help or anything else.

I have actually been in a homeless shelter for men., It was a large room with some pieces of cardboard on the floor, and was for men only. Women always have something better than that available through the Salvation Army or a similar organization.

You apparently moved the goalposts or raised the basket about women in the military too. You made this flat statement:

7. The last time the draft was in effect women were barred from serving in the military. If there should be outrage at this, it should be directed to those who barred them. Also, there doesnt seem to be a big movement to reintroduce the draft or to fight it..so this entire last arguement is painfully weak

When I pointed out there were women in the military during WW2, you hedged and said you just meant in combat, which is almost true. There have been a very few women who have participated in combat before then - shooting at the enemy and being shot at. You mentioned WAC's, who served in the military during WW2, as if wanting to refute your own original statement.

As for kissing your ass: You may know I am known for writing about eating pussy and also analingus. These are two of my favorite things to write about and to do so, if your ass is alluring enough, I would not only kiss it but even lick it.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Quote:
Originally Posted by LJ_Reloaded
Tell that to the nurses who were taken POW by the Japanese

Imagine how many less of them there would have been if they were allowed to carry a gun

Medics, including nurses, were not allowed to carry guns during WW2. That would have been a violation of the Geneva Convention.

 

[IndieSnob]

Maybe if you'd quit fixating on wanting to molest children, you'd learn how to quote you stupid fuck.