Killing people efficiently...8 dead at Indianapolis Fedex...MAGA!

WillJ8787

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 3, 2017
Posts
7,821
Source:
https://www.indystar.com/story/news...anapolis-fedex-shooting-what-know/7249332002/

Well, we have always been great at mass shootings. We are the world's leader in Mass Shootings.

It's nice to know that even if I own and carry a gun to my work (fedex) I stand little to no chance of defending myself against an assault weapon, which is common as buying a Coke these days.

Maybe if these mass shooters targeted the admin. Only or Congress/Senators only we could get some basic meaningful change?

Repubs have absolutely no plan for dealing with gun violence and mass shootings...which is why they are being voted out.
 
Republicans have no plan for anything except how to line their pockets.
 
It's nice to know that even if I own and carry a gun to my work (fedex) I stand little to no chance of defending myself against an assault weapon,

LMFAO!!!

So you have no idea what you're talking about, have never operated shit and don't know anything about guns or defending yourself with one.

An "assault weapon" i just a gun that leftist think looks scary.

Example.....a "ranch" rifle (top) vs "assault weapon" (bottom).
https://d7g7q7y3.stackpathcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/m1a-series-1600x800-1.png

Can you tell me which gun is more dangerous?? :confused:

I bet you can't. :D

Repubs have absolutely no plan for dealing with gun violence and mass shootings...which is why they are being voted out.

In major blue metro areas.

In the other 32 states they're going 2A sanctuary :D
 
Yep, this is why your an idiot and do such a wonderful job of pointing out what idiots like you think.

The Indianapolis FedEx....not a blue state or blue city(but it actually doesn't matter, gun violence is violence and it isn't partisan or political like you make everything out to be due to you goose stepping authoritarian Facist beliefs)

I can't legally carry either if these weapons to any work. I can carry a handgun (hidden and illegal which I could like my job over if discovered) and it will do me no good against either of these two rifles...ok dopey!
 
Yep, this is why your an idiot and do such a wonderful job of pointing out what idiots like you think.

The Indianapolis FedEx....not a blue state or blue city(but it actually doesn't matter, gun violence is violence and it isn't partisan or political like you make everything out to be due to you goose stepping authoritarian Facist beliefs)

I can't legally carry either if these weapons to any work. I can carry a handgun (hidden and illegal which I could like my job over if discovered) and it will do me no good against either of these two rifles...ok dopey!

Look at all that deflection via a big pile of outright LIES (in bold).

Which rifle is more dangerous WillJ?? "Ranch" or "Assault"??

And pistols are plenty effective inside 50m, maybe you should learn to use that pistol before you go carrying it illegally. ;)
 
Last edited:
The deflection comes from you as per usual.

By the way, I wouldn't need either of those rifles when it comes to the likes of you, I'm talking about average folks.

You know, the people we all see walking around this country who just want to live their lives(as you always say).

Not folks who play army.
 
The deflection comes from you as per usual.

By the way, I wouldn't need either of those rifles when it comes to the likes of you, I'm talking about average folks.

You know, the people we all see walking around this country who just want to live their lives(as you always say).

Not folks who play army.

More deflection.

Come' on!! Support your position BOY!! School us all on why the scary looking one needs to be banned but the "ranch" one is all good!!!

Or just admit the "assault weapon" talk is just fear mongering bullshit to play on the ignorance of the Democrat voter base :D

Who gives a fuck. Ban both of them, and let God sort 'em out.

Sure, as soon as you get rid of 2A. LOL best of luck with that comrade.


At least Coati is honest about his authoritarianism and distain for liberty.
 
Sure, as soon as you get rid of 2A. LOL best of luck with that comrade.


At least Coati is honest about his authoritarianism and distain for liberty.

Nahhh. We will eventually put better restrictions on which guns and which gun owners are allowable under 2A, and then punks like you can pout and cry all you want. :)
 
Nahhh. We will eventually put better restrictions on which guns and which gun owners are allowable under 2A, and then punks like you can pout and cry all you want. :)

Does any sentient adult doubt that the nomenklatura and their pals would suddenly be the only people in America suitable to keep and bear arms?
 
Does any sentient adult doubt that the nomenklatura and their pals would suddenly be the only people in America suitable to keep and bear arms?

I laugh when people attach things to Biden which Trump was prolifically guilty of.
 
The supposed justification for the 2A was so citizens could protect themselves from a corrupt government.

So according to supporters of gun rights, all of those insurrectionists at the capitol should have been able to violently overthrow the government. If it were not illegal to open-carry firearms in DC they would have wiped out Congress and we would now be living in a right-wing authoritarian state run by Donald Trump.

Another challenge to the 2A will come from law enforcement as citizens start defending themselves against cops. This has happened before.


Once the population of the U.S. gets tired of the nearly daily mass shootings the 2A will be seen as obsolete and will be overturned. If you like your gun rights you should be trying to discourage gun violence.
 
Last edited:
Does any sentient adult doubt that the nomenklatura and their pals would suddenly be the only people in America suitable to keep and bear arms?

Butt Sphincter:

Cool it with the paranoia and relax, and then you may finally be relieved of your anal-retentive constipation.

Dr. Coati
 
Maybe if these mass shooters targeted the admin. Only or Congress/Senators only we could get some basic meaningful change?

REPUBLICAN Congress/Senators. The Democrats constantly are trying to do something to bring sense to all of this. The issue is with REPUBLICANS.
 
Nahhh. We will eventually put better restrictions on which guns and which gun owners are allowable under 2A, and then punks like you can pout and cry all you want. :)

No, you wont.

The worst you can do is ban some accessories. That's it.

Why would I cry?? I already got myself established and have been in good standing with the ol' ATF for a long time now.

Pay my taxes I get to buy, sell and manufacture whatever the fuck I want.

A few G's extra and I could import and export too, but I'm not big enough to need that paperwork.
 
REPUBLICAN Congress/Senators. The Democrats constantly are trying to do something to bring sense to all of this. The issue is with REPUBLICANS.

Well that explains why most the gun violence happens in Blue cities. :rolleyes:
 
The supposed justification for the 2A was so citizens could protect themselves from a corrupt government.

So according to supporters of gun rights, all of those insurrectionists at the capitol should have been able to violently overthrow the government. If it were not illegal to open-carry firearms in DC they would have wiped out Congress and we would now be living in a right-wing authoritarian state run by Donald Trump.

Another challenge to the 2A will come from law enforcement as citizens start defending themselves against cops. This has happened before.


Once the population of the U.S. gets tired of the nearly daily mass shootings the 2A will be seen as obsolete and will be overturned. If you like your gun rights you should be trying to discourage gun violence.

As someone pointed out the other day, THREE percent of Americans (the "TeenyPeener" or "Super Owner" demographic) own HALF of the firearms in the United States of America.

The average TeenyPeener owns 17 weapons each.

The other 97 percent of gun owners own 1-3 guns.

The TeenyPeeners are the ones we need to watch out for the most.

#PewPewPew
 
If you like your gun rights you should be trying to discourage gun violence.

I would think regardless of political position, everyone should be trying.

That we differ on method is the problem.

One way, enforcing laws and ending the laxness on criminal prosecution and jailing, could be done now with no extra legislation needed.

The other requires legislation.

Why not try the first one? May as well ask why nobody polices the inner-city gang violence, or why many organizations exclude gang-related shootings in the tally of mass shootings.
 
The worst you can do is ban some accessories. That's it.

We'll see about that in next three to five years. And, if I am right, you can retreat to your bunker and whimper, while sensuously stroking the barrel of your "ranch rifle".
 
Back
Top