Judge blocks Trump's blatantly unconstitutional birthright citizenship order

[eric_erosfan]

Reagan judge says dumbest EO he's seen in 40 years.

 

[Lazaran]

Reagan judge says dumbest EO he's seen in 40 years.

That ^ tracks perfectly.

 

[eric_erosfan]

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/23/politics/birthright-citizenship-lawsuit-hearing-seattle/index.html

 

[Lazaran]

I would add:

I want that case fast tracked to the Supreme Court just to see President Musk (and DonOld) get slapped down hard early on.

A rolled up Constitution whack to the snout might teach President Musk (and DonOld) something.

 

[ChloeTzang]

I would add:

I want that case fast tracked to the Supreme Court......

That's what needs to happen. The 14th is pretty clear that these people are NOT entitled to citizenship.

 

[Rightguide]

Seattle Judge doesn't know his history.

 

[eric_erosfan]

That's what needs to happen. The 14th is pretty clear that these people are NOT entitled to citizenship.

Want to make a bet? If I win you take your sideways cunt out of here forever. If you win I'll leave.

 

[Bn2f]

Seattle Judge doesn't know his history.

Hahaha!
Tell us all about the history professor Idaho jones!

 

[icanhelp1]

Want to make a bet? If I win you take your sideways cunt out of here forever. If you win I'll leave.

No one can predict how the high court will rule. Barrett ruled in Merchan's favor to allow the Trump sentencing to play its course. Ballsy bet.

 

[Rightguide]

Want to make a bet? If I win you take your sideways cunt out of here forever. If you win I'll leave.

But when you leave make sure to take your racist but vertical cunt with you when you do, Trixie.

 

[eric_erosfan]

But when you leave make sure to take your racist but vertical cunt with you when you do, Trixie.

Relax chubby. I always speak to racist Chloe in her own language. She appreciates that I try.

 

[Rightguide]

No one can predict how the high court will rule. Barrett ruled in Merchan's favor to allow the Trump sentencing to play its course. Ballsy bet.

Yes, but the four conservatives who voted in Trump's favor will be important if an appeal is made to the SCOTUS in case of a negative forthcoming verdict in the NY Appeals Court, as a vote of four is all needed for certiorari.

 

[ll74]

A Reagan appointment.

“I have been on the bench for over four decades. I can’t remember another case whether the question presented was as clear,” Coughenour said.

“Where were the lawyers” when the decision to sign the executive order was made, the judge asked. He said that it “boggled” his mind that a member of the bar would claim the order was constitutional.

It's Eastman...so it tracks.

 

[Rightguide]

Relax chubby. I always speak to racist Chloe in her own language. She appreciates that I try.

Tell us all about it, Exalted Cyclops.

 

[Escierto]

If I was the judge I would refer the government lawyers defending this policy to the state bar authorities for disbarment.

Trump wants to operate as a dictator beyond the rule of law. Any lawyer helping him should face the end of his or her career.

 

[icanhelp1]

Yes, but the four conservatives who voted in Trump's favor will be important if an appeal is made to the SCOTUS in case of a negative forthcoming verdict in the NY Appeals Court, as a vote of four is all needed for certiorari.

I agree, however, I listened to an episode of Mark Levin and how he explained that not ruling against Merchan's felony sentencing set a precedent that give state courts the authority to interfere with federal jurisdiction. Called Barrett out of her mind and a coward. The Supremacy clause rules one time all the time. My jaw dropped when I read Barratt's ruling. She's a Robert's disguised as a female.

 

[schism666]

Seattle Judge doesn't know his history.

you don't even know the names of the patriots you make threads about, vetteman.

 

[Bn2f]

Tell us all about it, Exalted Cyclops.

Unimaginative copycater

 

[icanhelp1]

If I was the judge I would refer the government lawyers defending this policy to the state bar authorities for disbarment.

You need to read the 14th amendment and prior court rulings to understand why it needs to be overturned. People don't understand what "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" means.

Correction, not overturning the 14th, my mistake, but defining section I as it pertains to the birthright controversy.

 

[Politruk]

That's what needs to happen. The 14th is pretty clear that these people are NOT entitled to citizenship.

The children of undocumented immigrants, if born in the U.S., are subject to U.S. jurisdiction, therefore citizens.

 

[Politruk]

I agree, however, I listened to an episode of Mark Levin

Don't ever do that, it'll rot your brain worse than Limbaugh.

 

[ll74]

You need to read the 14th amendment and prior court rulings to understand why it needs to be overturned. People don't understand what "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" means

There's a reason why people agree with Eastman's horseshit. And it's not because the 14th Amendment needs to be overturned.

 

[Bn2f]

Don't ever do that, it'll rot your brain worse than Limbaugh.

I take issue with your premise that this member’s brain is functional and is subject to be rotted.

 

[icanhelp1]

Don't ever do that, it'll rot your brain worse than Limbaugh.

You're irrelevant.

 

[Lazaran]

I take issue with your premise that this member’s brain is functional and is subject to be rotted.

Yeah, if anything, it would pollute the air inside ineedhelp1’s empty cranium…