tortoise
roosevelt dime
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2002
- Posts
- 19,336
LowMurmur said:There's poetry in this. Also, I think I just broke my zipper.
She is single-handedly responsible for many wardrobe malfunctions.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LowMurmur said:There's poetry in this. Also, I think I just broke my zipper.
Olivia_Yearns said:By odd coincidence, you find his sexual blog on line. You make up an anonymous identity and talk with him about his kinks, including watching women totally absorbed in playing with their tits and jacking. Even talking about twiddling your bean makes him so hot. You refuse his offer of cyber sex (he thinks you live in another state) and leave him high and dry. THEN go jack loudly with the windows open.
/hijack.
Vox is the only one I read. Yes, I can see it.rosco rathbone said:This sounds like a Nicholson Baker plot.
A jack is like that in my experience too. Until the final build, it's a slow, musing process. Not a big show. But I think that is what would make it so sexy to watch. The slowness of a real build is what lets you feel the genuine arousal of the other person. One of the reasons I find porn hard to watch is because the women don't build slowly. Instant loud yelling that goes on and on. None of the tension. The real unfolding is like an alien invasion, almost a surprise the way it suddenly takes over, but only after the genuine slow build. Without that, it's not credible.This is mainly because I can't imagine that I'm all that entertaining to watch jack. I mean, I don't go for insertion and I probably play with my tits to the point of boredom for any potential audience, plus, I close my eyes and I'm into myself.
my Os aren't like that. i'd make a terrible woman.Olivia_Yearns said:Until the final build, it's a slow, musing process. Not a big show. But I think that is what would make it so sexy to watch. The slowness of a real build is what lets you feel the genuine arousal of the other person. One of the reasons I find porn hard to watch is because the women don't build slowly. Instant loud yelling that goes on and on. None of the tension. The real unfolding is like an alien invasion, almost a surprise the way it suddenly takes over, but only after the genuine slow build. Without that, it's not credible.
Olivia_Yearns said:Vox is the only one I read. Yes, I can see it.
I keep thinking about what Beebs said - A jack is like that in my experience too. Until the final build, it's a slow, musing process. Not a big show. But I think that is what would make it so sexy to watch. The slowness of a real build is what lets you feel the genuine arousal of the other person. One of the reasons I find porn hard to watch is because the women don't build slowly. Instant loud yelling that goes on and on. None of the tension. The real unfolding is like an alien invasion, almost a surprise the way it suddenly takes over, but only after the genuine slow build. Without that, it's not credible.
This is hard to articulate. Sexual performance can be fun, but it kills orgasm, both in intensity and depth. That's how it is for me, anyway. The slowness is the giving up of control. I think those fantasies of domination are a part of the same process - the gradual relinquishment of control so that the invasion of feeling can take over unblocked. What I'm fumbling with here - does it sound familiar to anyone?
That's what makes very slow and gentle cocksucking enjoyable too - because I imagine it has a similar effect. The deep letting go, rather then 'trying' to orgasm. So when, suddenly, the full tension builds, it is unforced - an emerging energy, like the presence of the holy spirit (in my own personal misuse of catholic imagery. Catholic imagery makes me hot.)
Hey, I wasn't saying all women are like that. I was implying that the way it looks on most porn is too unmodulated. How is it for you, snarkster?Hester said:my Os aren't like that. i'd make a terrible woman.
oh, wait....
i don't watch enough porn to really have a valid opinion. and when i do i'm already worked up before i press the play button so that doesn't help much either.Olivia_Yearns said:Hey, I wasn't saying all women are like that. I was implying that the way it looks on most porn is too unmodulated. How is it for you, snarkster?
I think you're reading me right. You've written about slow jacks before too - about not rushing it.tortoise said:Excellent post, OY. I think I get what you're driving at. With a slow building surrender (be it to your fantasies or your lover's control), you are no longer focusing on the mechanics of the act, which frees your mind and your body to just feel, immerse yourself, lose yourself. A true surrendering to pleasure. The mind is by far the most important sexual organ, and the less it is bogged down with mechanical minutiae, the more it is freed to work its mojo. Is that sort of what you were going for, or am I misreading you?
I can have a quickie too, or that sudden explosion of g-spot sensation. But my biggest, most stunning O's start off slow, and then there is a complete transformation from human to animal, total urgency.Hester said:i don't watch enough porn to really have a valid opinion. and when i do i'm already worked up before i press the play button so that doesn't help much either.
i think i'm too unmodulated.
that has no effect on the quality of mine. great Os seem to be a random occurrence. i wish i had some control over them like that.Olivia_Yearns said:I can have a quickie too, or that sudden explosion of g-spot sensation. But my biggest, most stunning O's start off slow, and then there is a complete transformation from human to animal, total urgency.
Hester said:my Os aren't like that. i'd make a terrible woman.
oh, wait....
Hester said:and on this note, i shall go have a quick, unmodulated, quality-yet-tbd jack before bed.
goodnight and goodjacking, pervs.
Except twins, sometimes.tortoise said:If there is one thing that I've definitely learned over the years, it's that NO two women are exactly alike, sexually.
MechaBlade said:Except twins, sometimes.
Oh, Ellen and Helen. You both were fantastic.
Olivia_Yearns said:Vox is the only one I read. Yes, I can see it.
I keep thinking about what Beebs said - A jack is like that in my experience too. Until the final build, it's a slow, musing process. Not a big show. But I think that is what would make it so sexy to watch. The slowness of a real build is what lets you feel the genuine arousal of the other person. One of the reasons I find porn hard to watch is because the women don't build slowly. Instant loud yelling that goes on and on. None of the tension. The real unfolding is like an alien invasion, almost a surprise the way it suddenly takes over, but only after the genuine slow build. Without that, it's not credible.
This is hard to articulate. Sexual performance can be fun, but it kills orgasm, both in intensity and depth. That's how it is for me, anyway. The slowness is the giving up of control. I think those fantasies of domination are a part of the same process - the gradual relinquishment of control so that the invasion of feeling can take over unblocked. What I'm fumbling with here - does it sound familiar to anyone?
That's what makes very slow and gentle cocksucking enjoyable too - because I imagine it has a similar effect. The deep letting go, rather then 'trying' to orgasm. So when, suddenly, the full tension builds, it is unforced - an emerging energy, like the presence of the holy spirit (in my own personal misuse of catholic imagery. Catholic imagery makes me hot.)
bridgeburner said:I've determined that I think all you people are sexy as hell because you're smart and you make me laugh. I get some of my best chuckles out of reading the JOL....which doesn't sound quite right but I hope you all know what I mean.
Had a jack attack today. I was sitting quietly reading on the couch --nothing sexy-- and I realized that I needed to pee. Had probably needed to for some time but was too engrossed in my book to get up and go. On the way to the bathroom I veered off into the bedroom instead. I was overwhelmed with the need to jack and I just knew it was going to be good. I came so hard I nearly wet myself, a really long, drawn-out rolling O with a good hard spike at the end. This was like the near-perfect 10 of O's.
Now I want to go jack but I'm afraid I'll be disappointed. Wish me luck. ;->
i'll often O almost immediately upon penetration. is that a buzzkill? or only if it's "performance?"tortoise said:And yeah, the instantaneous keening ululations of pornstresses immediately upon penetration is a total buzzkill for me, all the more so because it is such an obvious performance. When there is GENUINE arousal, as in that sybian video that was posted here a while back, my attention is riveted, completely. Otherwise, meh.
Hester said:i'll often O almost immediately upon penetration. is that a buzzkill? or only if it's "performance?"
you, I'm going to give you an honest answer (but please keep in mind that I am speaking only for myself):responding in PM.tortoise said:Just saw this as I was closing down, getting ready to leave for my walk. It's an EXCELLENT question, and because Iyou, I'm going to give you an honest answer (but please keep in mind that I am speaking only for myself):
It CAN be totally fucking hot, depending on a few factors. I do need a buildup of my partner's pleasure, it's a huge part of what works for me, what feeds my own pleasure. If the initial O is the only O forthcoming, then I would usually (but not always, there is never an always) need to tease and tantalizingly torment your body and mind for a long, long time before penetration (I hate the word "foreplay", because it makes it sound like it's some sort of prelude to REAL sex, where to me it IS real sex). If there are more Os to come, or at least more seriously intense pleasure for you, then I would have no trouble with a quick and dirty penetration early on, and by ALL means, O early, O often.
Okay, NOW you've made me late for my walk. Stop asking excellent questions, dammit!
*cloud of dust*
Speaking of wardrobe malfunctions, I had one myself - on live tv.tortoise said:She is single-handedly responsible for many wardrobe malfunctions.
Damn you! I wanted to watch this one!Hester said:responding in PM.![]()
Hester said:responding in PM.![]()
Olivia_Yearns said:Speaking of wardrobe malfunctions, I had one myself - on live tv.
http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/2165/misspiggygc0.th.jpg