Is this against CHYOO policy?

69

Virgin
Joined
Sep 6, 2001
Posts
20
A thread was submitted to me but I don't know if it's proper to accept it. I think it's borderline and if submitted to say Literotica would be accepted on a good day rejected on a bad. It involves nonlactating cheerleaders pretending to breastfeed a baby just so they have the experience. Should I accept it?
 
I'm not sure how the powers that be would react to that situation, me personally I wouldn't class it as a sexual act with a minor because the baby is only doing what comes natural anyway, if the cheerleaders ain't getting anything sexual out of it, i.e. if its just for the experience as you say then its not even a sexual scene just experimentation.

But if the cheerleaders are getting a sexual kick out of it, that stumbles into a grey area that I'm not sure about, on one hand its not really a sexual act with a minor because the baby is only trying to be fed on the other hand some people could class it to be immorral. I suppose it just depends on how far you want to go, you could either try to push the boundries of the rules to make the stories a little more daring (be careful not to go too far as this is what killed the old style stories) or you could sit safe within the rules and produce stories that are not quite as exciting to read.

For example take into consideration film directors such as Quentin Tarrentino and Stephen Speilberg, now Tarrentino makes films that are exciting and you never know whats going to happen next, but there is more public outcry and controversy when one of his films are released. Speilberg on the other hand still make great films that are exepted by everyone the only downfall is that you always know what is going to happen in his films and they are always predictable because there are boundries he won't cross.

Sorry for such a long reply, I hope you understand what I mean and I'm not knocking either safe people or experimental people because there is good in both, just make the decision based on what you believe after all thats why you have the accept/reject button, your the editor.
 
I would think if it was enough to make you uncomfortable and have to ask then no you shouldn't post it. Being as we are writing erotic stories whether the act is in deed erotica wouldn't really be the case would it? Ask yourself why would this person wrote this idea into an erotic story in the first place perhaps because they found it erotic? Is it really necessary to the plot of the story? Is it really adding to the story or are others going to pull up like you did?

Just my thoughts as I haven't read it in context.
Silk
 
Hmmm... As I wrote the thread in question, maybe I should explain myself and put it in context.

69 wrote the baby into the story originally (and in fact I thought |U|that|/U| was a bit borderline - but it was put to one side before the sexual stuff started, so I figured that was okay). But 69's breastfeeding scene inspired me to create an alternative one - using the infant as a convenient way to get a couple of cheerleaders to take their tops off.

Believe me, I am far more interested in the cheer squad (who, I should emphasis, are |U|seniors|/U|!) than in the baby. And as with 69's story, I had fully intended to write the baby out of the story in the next thread.
 
very true.... babies are good for that :)
sadly this could be taken by some as pedophilic
how old are these cheerleaders?
does the story still work, say, at a slumber party, where the girls are playing truth or dare and they find out a girl has pierced nipples, and they are large/small/something unusual, and they all get topless to compare? what about in the locker room while they are changing?
just an idea, like it then use it...
 
If you really want to explore it in depth, you can check it out here: http://www.chyoo.com/dx/?dx=r&story_id=807&next_id=5387 and choose the 'exposed cheerleader' option

The only reason I thought A.W.s post was more daring than my own is because the baby was actually being fed for food, whereas in his they were not. I did accept it, and his follow-up thread seemed to be fine too, so if I'm brought down by the system :) at least you'll all know I had no dark motives. :D
 
Last edited:
Back
Top