Le Jacquelope
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2003
- Posts
- 76,445
And the volunteers closed the door on option #1.tactful said:A draft, two reasons, if there's a war, and if you leave the door ajar.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the volunteers closed the door on option #1.tactful said:A draft, two reasons, if there's a war, and if you leave the door ajar.
LovingTongue said:Reason #2 why I won this fight from the start:
http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=entertainment&id=3190045&ft=print
Most Americans Oppose Draft
WASHINGTON (AP) June 24, 2005 - Americans overwhelmingly oppose reinstatement of the military draft and most say they wouldn't encourage their children to enlist in the service either, an AP-Ipsos poll found.
That resistance underscores the dilemma facing the Bush administration as it struggles to recruit a volunteer military in war time.
The Army is falling behind its recruiting goals at a time the country is fighting extended wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Army has repeatedly missed its monthly recruiting goals this year, falling short by 42 percent in April.
And all four branches of military service are having trouble attracting recruits to their reserve forces.
Despite the recruiting problems, seven in 10 Americans say they oppose reinstatement of the draft, and almost half of those polled strongly oppose that step, the AP-Ipsos poll found. About a quarter of the people in this country say they favor reinstating the draft.
Men were more likely than women to favor reinstating the draft and those over age 50 were more likely to favor it than younger adults. Republicans were more likely than Democrats to support the idea. But a majority of each of those groups opposed the draft.
"Things have been working well with the all-volunteer army and that's how it should stay," said Kathy Fowler, a 44-year-old mother from Chillicothe, Ohio.
More than 1,700 members of the U.S. military have died since the start of the Iraq war and thousands more have been wounded. Gen. John Abizaid, the top U.S. commander in the Middle East, told members of Congress on Thursday that the Iraqi insurgency is as active as six months ago and more foreign fighters are flowing in all the time.
The shortfalls in military recruiting have led to speculation that the government might be forced to reinstitute the draft. But Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has ruled it out, saying the all-volunteer force has proved the wisdom of discontinuing the draft in 1973. "There isn't a chance in the world that the draft will be brought back," Rumsfeld told a House hearing Thursday.
New York Rep. Charles Rangel, a Democrat, has introduced bills to bring back the draft, saying military recruiters disproportionately pursue young people in poor neighborhoods. The legislation went nowhere.
Some feel the military's recruitment problems will force a return to the draft.
"If we had more manpower in the Middle East we could get this over with," said James Puma, a retiree from Buffalo, N.Y. "I'm a Republican, I'm with the president. But things in Iraq are not going good at all."
However, Jeremy Miller, a sales manager from Denver, said the Iraq war is "a situation the president has gotten us into and should be able to get us out of" without bringing back the draft.
More than half of those polled said they would discourage a son from enlisting in the military, while two-thirds said they would discourage a daughter from joining.
Democrats were more likely than Republicans to say they would discourage sons and daughters from enlisting.
If a military draft were reinstated, more than half in the poll, 54 percent, said they would oppose women being drafted.
Women were more likely than men to be opposed to drafting women. Adults born after the end of World War II but before 1965 were more likely to favor the drafting of women than people in other age groups.
The American public has strongly opposed reinstating the draft for the past couple of decades, according to various polls. And the decreasing support for the war in Iraq suggests that is unlikely to change anytime soon.
"People simply don't want their kids to be sent off to Iraq to be shot at in a situation in which the value of the war is becoming more and more questionable," said John Mueller, a political science professor at Ohio State University and author of "War, Presidents and Public Opinion."
"The draft has never been popular and there's little reason to believe it would be popular now," public opinion analyst Karlyn Bowman said.
The poll of 1,000 adults was conducted June 20-22 for the AP by Ipsos, an international polling firm, and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Copyright Associated Press 2005. All Rights Reserved.
I thought there were only three branches of the military.LovingTongue said:And all four branches of military service . . .
He's probably counting The Coast Guard.MakersandIce said:I thought there were only three branches of the military.
Eh, which is not one of the four branches of the military, super intolerance dude?MakersandIce said:I thought there were only three branches of the military.

Rushing to join would be it.Frimost said:You are talking about Iraq and Afghanistan where a vital, strategic interest of the US is not threatned (not by anything that can't replace it) and where we don't need to draft people. Now if for example we were directly assaulted that would be a different matter. As an example, in an unlikely scenario where a Sino-Soviet Alliance invaded Alaska and Canada and was making its way down to the mainland then you would have people rushing to join or willingly be drafted.
Marines are part of the Navy, as sailors are happy to remind marines.LovingTongue said:Eh, which is not one of the four branches of the military, super intolerance dude?
Army
Navy
Air Force
Marines
Coast Guard
Chairborne rangers
![]()
The ones in red.LovingTongue said:Eh, which is not one of the four branches of the military, super intolerance dude?
Army
Navy
Air Force
Marines
Coast Guard
Chairborne rangers
![]()
There is a Department of Navy, Air Force, and Army. The Corps is part of the Navy, and the CG is part of Homeland Security.LovingTongue said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_of_the_United_States
The Military of the United States, officially known as the United States Armed Forces, is structured into five branches consisting of the:
* United States Army
* United States Marine Corps
* United States Navy
* United States Air Force
* United States Coast Guard
Just so you know that source of info is riddled with errors and should take it with a tablespoon of salt next time you quote from that hack of a source.LovingTongue said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_of_the_United_States
The Military of the United States, officially known as the United States Armed Forces, is structured into five branches consisting of the:
* United States Army
* United States Marine Corps
* United States Navy
* United States Air Force
* United States Coast Guard
Really? Prove it. And show me your "reliable" contradictory source of info.Frimost said:Just so you know that source of info is riddled with errors and should take it with a tablespoon of salt next time you quote from that hack of a source.
LOL, too many errors to list em all and I only got 10 minutes left on the computer before my time runs out (I am on a public computer). For example look up the T-72 tank in there and half the shit listed is laughably wrong, printed as propaganda by teenage Russian nationlist losers with a hard-on for com-block junk. Sorry i could not give you a better example but i stick with what i know that that's the first example that comes to mind.LovingTongue said:Really? Prove it. And show me your "reliable" contradictory source of info.
That same article calls DHS, "The Department of Homeland Defense."LovingTongue said:http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/generalinfo/a/military101.htm
There are five military branches: The Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard.
And I stick with the four diverse sources that I used to back up what I said, to everyone else's none.Frimost said:LOL, too many errors to list em all and I only got 10 minutes left on the computer before my time runs out (I am on a public computer). For example look up the T-72 tank in there and half the shit listed is laughably wrong, printed as propaganda by teenage Russian nationlist losers with a hard-on for com-block junk. Sorry i could not give you a better example but i stick with what i know that that's the first example that comes to mind.
Okay, then here's another unreliable source.MakersandIce said:That same article calls DHS, "The Department of Homeland Defense."
Are you arguing that The marines are not part of the navy? lol Look, you are going to lose on this, I was part of NJROTC and most of my best friends are Marines so beleive me, WE KNOW.LovingTongue said:And I stick with the four diverse sources that I used to back up what I said, to everyone else's none.
Keep attacking Wikipedia all you want.Frimost said:Are you arguing that The marines are not part of the navy? lol Look, you are going to lose on this, I was part of NJROTC and most of my best friends are Marines so beleive me, WE KNOW.
There was a good news article on the inaccuracies of winepeda, perhaps you can find it if you google for it?
I never said the sources were unreliable. I'm not a biologist, so I get lost in the semantics between limbs and branches. Yes, I consider both the Corps and the Coasties military. I, however, do not consider them branches.LovingTongue said:Okay, then here's another unreliable source.
http://www.military.com/Recruiting/Content/0,13898,rec_step01_splash,,00.html
Who they are: the Department of Defense and the five branches: Air Force, Army, Coast Guard, Marine Corps, and Navy.
Source for what, that Thmarines are part of the navy? LOL Each time you argue the point you lsoe credability in other peoples eyes! lol Call you're local recruiter if you need more proof!LovingTongue said:Keep attacking Wikipedia all you want.
There are now four other sources that back me up in that there are five branches.
You have yet to show me even one source that backs you up.

Ok hold up. Which are we to go with here? What you consider, or what every documented source presented, considers? It's literally your word against an Army's.MakersandIce said:I never said the sources were unreliable. I'm not a biologist, so I get lost in the semantics between limbs and branches. Yes, I consider both the Corps and the Coasties military. I, however, do not consider them branches.