Ironic Lawsuit

Thrillhouse

Back from the dead
Joined
Jun 22, 2002
Posts
1,752
This is just fucking hilarious.



http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/12/10/jurors.lawsuit.ap/index.html

FAYETTE, Mississippi (AP) -- Two former Jefferson County, Mississippi, jurors have filed a $6 billion lawsuit against CBS' "60 Minutes" and a newspaper owner over comments about the size of jury awards in the county.

Anthony Berry and Johnny Anderson said the news program defamed them in a segment that called the county a haven for "jackpot justice."

Berry was among jurors who made a $150 million verdict in an asbestos case, and Anderson sat on a jury that awarded a $150 million judgment in a diet drug case.

They are seeking $597 million in actual damages and $5.9 billion in punitive damages.

During a "60 Minutes" report last month, Fayette florist Beau Strittman -- who won a nonjury settlement in a lawsuit over the obesity drug Redux -- said juries "awarded these people this money because they felt as if they were going to get a cut off of it."

Strittman said he was joking and thought he was off camera when he made the comment.

"I don't think the jury here in Jefferson County or anyone has done anything wrong, and if they have, it's not of my knowledge," he said last week.

Also named in the suit is Wyatt Emmerich, who owns Emmerich Newspapers Inc. and who also criticized Jefferson County juries on "60 Minutes."

Emmerich described Jefferson County jurors as disenfranchised residents who want to stick it to Yankee companies.

"The African-Americans feel like it's payback for disenfranchisement. And the rednecks, shall we say, it's like, `Hey, you know, get back at' -- revenge for the Civil War. And it's very easy to weave this racial conflict and this class conflict into a big money pot for the attorneys."

Kevin Tedesco, a "60 Minutes" spokesman, said the program cannot comment until it has received a copy of the lawsuit.

"We stand by the story," he said. "We'll comment after we've been properly served."

Emmerich said Monday his remarks were aimed at the jury system in general rather than any specific jury. He called the lawsuit frivolous.
 
Thrillhouse its all fien and good that you want to post incessantly with news items but this is most certainly not irony.
 
If 5 posts qualifies as "incessantly," I am deeply sorry. But how is this lawsuit not ironic?
 
Thrillhouse said:
How is that NOT ironic? That's the very textbook definition of ironic.

nope, it's not, I just looked it up to be certain. The lack of incongruity precludes it from being ironic, as the action taken is not incongruent with the subject of the report - in fact, it reinforces it.
 
LOL

Lets say Irony is what you would nto expect happening.

You think its unexpected that these jurors would file a frivolous case for a ridiculous sum of money?

I beg to differ.
 
modest mouse said:
LOL

Lets say Irony is what you would nto expect happening.

You think its unexpected that these jurors would file a frivolous case for a ridiculous sum of money?

I beg to differ.
behave before he moves to Missippi just so he can sue you for defamation.

Ironic, aint it?
 
Thrillhouse said:
How is that NOT ironic? That's the very textbook definition of ironic.

No, it would have been ironic if someone had sued jurors for a huge settlement who had awarded very little money in a previous settlement.

People who award huge settlements suing someone for a huge amount is not ironic, it's expected. Ridiculous, but expected.
 
modest mouse said:
LOL

Lets say Irony is what you would nto expect happening.

You think its unexpected that these jurors would file a frivolous case for a ridiculous sum of money?

I beg to differ.

Now that you mention it, I guess that WOULD be expected in the times in which we live.

Never mind.

Still funny, though.
 
Thrillhouse said:
Now that you mention it, I guess that WOULD be expected in the times in which we live.

Never mind.

Still funny, though.

The times in which we live is not why its not ironic. Maybe you should consult your 'textbook' again.
 
Back
Top