Iran fires missiles at multiple U.S. positions in Iraq in retaliation for Soleimani k

If one intends to count coup over non-substantive, obvious typographical errors, it is a good idea to avoid committing substantial errors in reasoning and grammar while doing so.

Even better would be to have an interest in, and knowledge of, the subject matter being discussed so that you can actively participate in the discussion rather than simply looking to score meaningless internet points.
Good idea. When will you start?
 
Oh, boy, you again. :rolleyes: My GB Stalker ... read my next line and imagine me being bored of you while I type it.

You just can't help yourself when I'm around, can you, chomo? You see me and you start to drool like a cocksucker with an empty mouth. :eek:

You mad, Gav?

You droolin'?:)
 
Welp, that escalated quickly.

What kind of volunteer work can I do for our troops?
 
So who shot down the Ukrainian plane? :confused:

We’ll know why the plane was shot down when we figure out who was on that flight.

The Malaysian flight that mysteriously disappeared over the Indian Ocean is popping in my mind. There was a guy on that plane that held a patent for a company that the Rothschilds owned. The patent was for an aerial anti-radar cloaking device.
 
Iran fires missiles at multiple U.S. positions in Iraq in retaliation for Soleimani killing

WASHINGTON — Iran launched attacks on U.S. military bases in Iraq on Tuesday evening in apparent retaliation for the killing of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani, which was ordered by President Trump.

According to a statement from the Department of Defense, the attacks began at approximately 5:30 p.m. EST...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/iran-fir...aliation-for-soleimani-killing-002758265.html

https://media3.giphy.com/media/3o6wrAEqQYDcRUJPy0/giphy.gif
 
I watched a video of the hnic Aytollah at soleimanis funeral. He had a major fit, like a 3 year old with severe autism. It keeps getting scrubbed from the YouTube’s.
 
We’ll know why the plane was shot down when we figure out who was on that flight.

The Malaysian flight that mysteriously disappeared over the Indian Ocean is popping in my mind. There was a guy on that plane that held a patent for a company that the Rothschilds owned. The patent was for an aerial anti-radar cloaking device.

Yeah, any explanation that relates it to the conflict doesn't make any sense to me,
but it's no accident either.


BTW
I no longer know what or who to believe.

I read Reuters/VOX and left bellisarius's thread yesterday being totally convinced that Trump had no choice but..., having been provoked by Iran who attacked first.

and now I just listened to the news with Rick Sanchez for a comparison, https://www.rt.com/shows/news-with-rick-sanchez/477681-news-with-rick-sanchez-january/
and they're pretty convincing that Trump (knowingly or not) provoked Iran, starting with withdrawal from that agreement, and then by supporting of SA when it was attacked by Iran.

They're both equally convincing but they all have holes in their arguments too.
 
Aren't all passenger planes supposed to be grounded for their own safety, in such cases?
Apparently Americans did that -- they barred any of theirs from using the airspace.


Maybe the Ukrainian plane decided to take off anyway and was confused on the radar with something else.

But 'Ukrainian' again. Hmm... It's all so bizarre
 
Yes, this is WWIII!


An ineffectual scattered rocket attack.

This must be a new and novel thing coming from the Jihaddi...
 
Yeah, any explanation that relates it to the conflict doesn't make any sense to me,
but it's no accident either.


BTW
I no longer know what or who to believe.

I read Reuters/VOX and left bellisarius's thread yesterday being totally convinced that Trump had no choice but..., having been provoked by Iran who attacked first.

and now I just listened to the news with Rick Sanchez for a comparison, https://www.rt.com/shows/news-with-rick-sanchez/477681-news-with-rick-sanchez-january/
and they're pretty convincing that Trump (knowingly or not) provoked Iran, starting with withdrawal from that agreement, and then by supporting of SA when it was attacked by Iran.

They're both equally convincing but they all have holes in their arguments too.

How could they possibly be provoked?
President Obama gave them an agreement that held them harmless.
Then they continued to issue harm knowing that they were to be held harmless...

So now they are angry because they are being held to account for harm?
Think about it.
 
The "Appeasement Policy" has come to an end. Actually it ended when Trump withdrew from that joke of a nuclear deal.
 
WASHINGTON — Iran launched attacks on U.S. military bases in Iraq on Tuesday evening in apparent retaliation for the killing of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani, which was ordered by President Trump.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EDM92nFUYAMZBwM.png

lol. they, especially reichman, are have been having aneurysms since trump fucked up. 🤯😖

actually since 2008 😎

When exactly did Trump fuck up???

Who is the "enemy liar?" :confused:


And there you are admitting Trump is the enemy....while cheerleading for Iran, acting like they're going to be the ones tearing us a new ass.

Typical "progressive"....I can see why you're on that side of things.
.
 
Thanks for pointing the error out in my post. Must have gotten my wires crossed when I was typing two missiles, two bases. :eek:

Iran claims 80 Americans were killed. You know, I guess now America has to go in and avenge those 80 :rolleyes: American lives. I wonder where we'll strike next?
If you had your way you would hit the closest chuck e cheese, you degenerate, gav! :)
 
Yeah, any explanation that relates it to the conflict doesn't make any sense to me,
but it's no accident either.


BTW
I no longer know what or who to believe.

I read Reuters/VOX and left bellisarius's thread yesterday being totally convinced that Trump had no choice but..., having been provoked by Iran who attacked first.

and now I just listened to the news with Rick Sanchez for a comparison, https://www.rt.com/shows/news-with-rick-sanchez/477681-news-with-rick-sanchez-january/
and they're pretty convincing that Trump (knowingly or not) provoked Iran, starting with withdrawal from that agreement, and then by supporting of SA when it was attacked by Iran.

They're both equally convincing but they all have holes in their arguments too.
You watch Russia Times news? Why is that?
 
You watch Russia Times news? Why is that?


I no longer watch TV news at all, in any form. But I've seen it said that RT and AlJazeera are among the most balanced and least biased of all world news TV sources. Even BBC that used to be at the top falls short.
 
You watch Russia Times news? Why is that?

Only their Shows section -- once in a blue moon.
For news I watch NBC.

RT hosts good shows by Chris Hedges, Rick Sanchez and Ross Ashcroft
Interestingly enough, they espouse beliefs that are eerily similar to those of GB democrats.

But with the Iran-US crisis, they've been on a marathon of all sorts of interesting opinion pieces.
 
Back
Top