In this thread I officially condemn the fringe element of the Right

Probably just spank him and send him home with a note to his mother.;)


Right, pops. After I tipped over your wheelchair and heard you moan I've fallen and I can't get up, I'd at least have the courtesy to wait for the meat wagon to come get you.
 
Ahahaha, you always fall into that stereotypical trap? No wonder your growth is so stunted.:rolleyes:

Notice the hostility toward adults.

They need to generate a lot of resentment toward adults and seniors in our country -- marginalize them. That way they can cut Medicare and give free health care to all the illegal aliens they love so much.
 
Ahahaha, you always fall into that stereotypical trap? No wonder your growth is so stunted.:rolleyes:

Dude, you have bad joke diarrhea of the pie hole lately. But if you wanna keep acting a fool, be my guest.
 
As far as our lefties go, there isn't an ounce of elevated integrity in that gaggle that affords any prominence from which to judge the same in others, and in that category I can't think of a more offensive cloud of anal steam than your daily emissions Rory.

Good job vetteman!!
Don't worry about rory and luke. They are just stupid board trolls.
 
Last edited:
Isn't it interesting how the most fervent Lit liberals have defective personalities?
 
Isn't it interesting how the most fervent Lit liberals have defective personalities?

It's true, but not interesting.

Then again, when was the last time you said something interesting?

Links, please.
 
Joe Wilson: immature whiner
Ann Coulter: psycho
Tom Coburn: racist
Virginia Foxx: liar
Michael Savage: "raving lunatic"
Glen Beck: "chicken little"
busybody: search "Threads started by user"
koalabear: clueless
Karen Kraft: lots of flowing words, but no content
Frisco_Slug_Esq: spouts gibberish like a valid point
vetteman: whackjob


More will be added later...

RoryN: closeted homosexual
 
As far as our lefties go, there isn't an ounce of elevated integrity in that gaggle that affords any prominence from which to judge the same in others, and in that category I can't think of a more offensive cloud of anal steam than your daily emissions Rory.

Be careful of Rorys anal emissions cuz you might get a blast of leftover jizz from his recent session with "Samuelx"

Samuelx likes to show pussy bois like Rory whose boss
 
I promised Rory I'd stop in here, but upon further review, I may not be particularly qualified to comment on some of these personalities. But I'll try:

Joe Wilson: Someone I know nothing about other than his classless disruption of the President's speech to a Joint Session of Congress.
Ann Coulter: Drama queen and media con artist extraordinaire.
Rush Limbaugh: Drama King. Blowhard. Often right on principle, but too often "fires for effect."
Tom Coburn: I Googled and still don't know who he is.
Virginia Foxx: Likewise
Michael Savage: Known only by "disreputation." I don't believe I've ever actually heard his voice.
Glen Beck: The Gallagher of political commentators. The act doesn't translate well.
Bill O'Reilly: Overbearing bloviator blind to the very same faults he's so quick to criticize in others. Rude interviewer. Intellectually shallow.

Most of the above media personalities share the same operational bias as their leftist colleagues at the ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and others. Controversy sells. "If it bleeds, it leads." If they're not screaming, their viewers and listeners aren't screaming and if the viewers and listeners aren't screaming, they're changing channels. In many instances, I question how deep their ideology really runs.

As for the usual suspects that populate the Literotica right wing, I cannot condemn K-bear, Vette, Ish, AJ, KK, and most others as consistently displaying credentials that would qualify them for membership in any category described as a "lunatic fringe." Neither mainstream conservatism or liberalism is "fringe." Fringe is further out.

I am sure they have been guilty of specific statements with which I would heartily disagree, but I believe most of our characterizations of each other here tend to hinge on more personally targeted invectives than on socially poisonous positions. I've been guilty of the same judgments.

And then, there's BB.

I tend to believe there's more shtick than starch in some of his rants, but it cannot be denied that his very worst and most outrageous beliefs live at the political fringe. But on those occasions when he displays intelligence and rationality, I’ll continue to engage him. I suppose even PETA can be “right” some of the time.

So go ahead and let me have it. Pussy. Apologist. Blah, blah, blah. It's not like I haven't heard it before.
 
I promised Rory I'd stop in here, but upon further review, I may not be particularly qualified to comment on some of these personalities. But I'll try:

Joe Wilson: Someone I know nothing about other than his classless disruption of the President's speech to a Joint Session of Congress.
Ann Coulter: Drama queen and media con artist extraordinaire.
Rush Limbaugh: Drama King. Blowhard. Often right on principle, but too often "fires for effect."
Tom Coburn: I Googled and still don't know who he is.
Virginia Foxx: Likewise
Michael Savage: Known only by "disreputation." I don't believe I've ever actually heard his voice.
Glen Beck: The Gallagher of political commentators. The act doesn't translate well.
Bill O'Reilly: Overbearing bloviator blind to the very same faults he's so quick to criticize in others. Rude interviewer. Intellectually shallow.

Most of the above media personalities share the same operational bias as their leftist colleagues at the ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and others. Controversy sells. "If it bleeds, it leads." If they're not screaming, their viewers and listeners aren't screaming and if the viewers and listeners aren't screaming, they're changing channels. In many instances, I question how deep their ideology really runs.

As for the usual suspects that populate the Literotica right wing, I cannot condemn K-bear, Vette, Ish, AJ, KK, and most others as consistently displaying credentials that would qualify them for membership in any category described as a "lunatic fringe." Neither mainstream conservatism or liberalism is "fringe." Fringe is further out.

I am sure they have been guilty of specific statements with which I would heartily disagree, but I believe most of our characterizations of each other here tend to hinge on more personally targeted invectives than on socially poisonous positions. I've been guilty of the same judgments.

And then, there's BB.

I tend to believe there's more shtick than starch in some of his rants, but it cannot be denied that his very worst and most outrageous beliefs live at the political fringe. But on those occasions when he displays intelligence and rationality, I’ll continue to engage him. I suppose even PETA can be “right” some of the time.

So go ahead and let me have it. Pussy. Apologist. Blah, blah, blah. It's not like I haven't heard it before.
Meh. I feel you had the kiddie gloves on. The worst thing you said about BB (who is pretty much the worst regular non-troll poster I've seen on any forum) is that his beliefs are "fringe."
 
Interesting to compare the reaction to this thread to Rory's, isn't it?

Most right-wingers won't be able to condemn any other right-wingers until Bill O'Reilly gives them notes on how to do so.
 
Back
Top