In this thread, I officially condemn the fringe element of the left

Do you really think the right want garbage to be the spokesperson for that thread?

Nope.

But, if he made a thread they didn't approve of, it'd be a perfect place for them to show some balls and voice said opinion.

Also, if they're unified in their denouncement of him, I expect to see his name mentioned in the thread.
 
I'd like a few hours with the above woman's hard drive.
 
Agree with 1-6. On the fence re: 7.

Gee, I wouldn't have thought it'd take so long for our Conservative friends to come up with their thread. It's not hard. What gives?

I could easily make a list of kooky right-winger ideas, too. I think it would be just as long, probably about the same.

Has anybody actually ever said they favor this?

I think most of your list falls under the heading of "public policy positions I disagree with" than anything truly fringe. There's nothing there as outrageous as, for example, a belief that the President is not an American citizen, or that health care reform is a front for the mass killings of the elderly.

True enough, but this is a thread about kooky lefties.

Yikes, is this the real Ferd Turgeson?...:)

Sounds like you graduated from nonsensical to sensible...:D


.

Hey, it's not my fault that because I disagree with some right winger ideas I automatically get labeled as a liberal commie, or whatever.

I'm complicated.
 
I'd love to keep it internal with you, if you don't mind me not pulling out. :kiss:

I have a thing for creampies.. so.. I guess I wouldn't mind. Providing you clean up afterwards. I don't want my processor to overload.;)
 
Rory why do you keep talking to yourself

I don't know. Why do I?
Afterall; you seem to know everything about me, so why can't you figure out such a simple question as me talking to myself.

Perhaps you're slipping up Java.
 
Le Jacquelope: Liberal nutjob whose political views I do not support
Even though my political views seem to keep winning out over and over again in the political scene.

I was the one who saw this crisis coming AND who saw Obama coming into office from as far back as 2005.

It sucks to be you, dude. I've got society's pulse... what do you have? :)
 
Instead of naming kooky people, I'll name some kooky ideas:

1. Reparations for slavery. Sorry, no one is alive who was ever a slave.

2. Affirmative action. A form of reverse racism. People should be judged on their merits, alone. Never on the color of their skin.

3. Mandatory health checkups, ala Hillary Clinton. Huh? You will get a physical at pain of imprisonment?

4. Banning guns. Just as stupid as attempting to ban drugs.

5. Banning certain foods. See above.

6. Attempting to force Churches to perform Gay Marriages. That should be left to individual churches. That's like forcing a Buddhist temple to perform a Hindu marriage.

7.Making legal abortion the law of the land. If you want that, add a Constitutional Amendment. Otherwise, it should be left to the States to decide.

It must be so terrible for me living in a land where 2-5 and 7 are so damn taking for granted.
 
Instead of naming kooky people, I'll name some kooky ideas:

1. Reparations for slavery. Sorry, no one is alive who was ever a slave.

2. Affirmative action. A form of reverse racism. People should be judged on their merits, alone. Never on the color of their skin.

3. Mandatory health checkups, ala Hillary Clinton. Huh? You will get a physical at pain of imprisonment?

4. Banning guns. Just as stupid as attempting to ban drugs.

5. Banning certain foods. See above.

6. Attempting to force Churches to perform Gay Marriages. That should be left to individual churches. That's like forcing a Buddhist temple to perform a Hindu marriage.

7.Making legal abortion the law of the land. If you want that, add a Constitutional Amendment. Otherwise, it should be left to the States to decide.

1. It has nothing to do with anybody being a slave. It's just one of those things that needs to be let go.

2. I go back and forth on this. Ideally people are judged on their merits, realistically they aren't. Realistically they are judged by who they know. Blacks, hispanics and even Asians who perform well at nearly all tasks still don't have the opportunity simply because very few of them are related to established money.

3. I agree. I also think that if you DON'T get a health check up and you let something that is easily treated early get out of hand we should lock you out of the Emergency room and let you die if you can't afford it out of your money.

4. Europe would beg to differ. So would much of Asia. When nobody has guns because guns are highly illgal criminals find it difficult to get guns. Not to mention when you can say with 99% confidence that the other guy doesn't have a gun you don't feel the pressure to go out and get one for protection.

To say nothing of it eliminating accidental deaths or emotional murders.

The only justification for keeping guns legal is to protect ourselves from the government. I happen to think that is a good enough reason and that we suffer acceptable losses for this.

5. Meh. I just think it's stupid. Also it's your body, I think we should legalize all drugs that have no major psychological effects. If you want to sit in a corner and fuck your body, it's your body. Have fun and die.

6. Complete agreement.

7. Roe v Wade is sufficient. We should pass an amendment but honestly we might be at a point where revisting statehood is a good idea. It was a great idea 200 years ago there were no cars, no internet, blah blah blah. I mean really what's the point of setting a law in Florida that a twenty minute drive to Alabama circumvents?
 
4. Europe would beg to differ. So would much of Asia. When nobody has guns because guns are highly illgal criminals find it difficult to get guns. Not to mention when you can say with 99% confidence that the other guy doesn't have a gun you don't feel the pressure to go out and get one for protection.

To say nothing of it eliminating accidental deaths or emotional murders.
Yeah, instead of gun violence, Europe (specifically the UK) has a sword and knife problem. Now I don't know if banning them would also be a good idea, because the problem isn't weapons, it's people. If people wanted to kill or hurt someone, they will find a way.

The only justification for keeping guns legal is to protect ourselves from the government. I happen to think that is a good enough reason and that we suffer acceptable losses for this.
Another good reason is why would you want to invade a country that has a gun behind every blade of grass. If you think Vietnam and Iraq was a blood bath, you try occupying the US when everyone is possibly armed to the teeth.
 
Yeah, instead of gun violence, Europe (specifically the UK) has a sword and knife problem. Now I don't know if banning them would also be a good idea, because the problem isn't weapons, it's people. If people wanted to kill or hurt someone, they will find a way.

I don't know if the knife-problem is a problem. even if this sounds smart aleck: you need much more experience or skill to do harm with a knife than with a gun. It's not cool to be a businessman always having your knife with you, like its cool to be an American businessman always having a weapon in his jacket.

If the access to guns is so easy and the handling of it is so fetish-like and not that responsible like it has to be, it has an interaction with the society and to those willing to do harm to it, no matter what way.

The biggest reason for Americans to be against every weapon banning is their tradition of having them and showing them.
 
WeenieWeenieWeenie said:
How about I call you a fucking retard and put you on ignore.

You can't stand the truth, or what?

I know it's hard to have no arguments.
 
With so many weak political threads in the mix today, I thought it'd be a good time to re-visit this one.

There's still time for a real response to this thread, right-wingers. The best you could do before was a n00b poster (probably an alt) who came up with one for your side, and hardly anyone stepped to the plate to add to that thread.

Maybe I'll periodically add some more left fringe things to put down...
 
Updated with: Charles Barron, Drixxx, and the "New Black Panthers".
 
You can't stand the truth, or what?

I know it's hard to have no arguments.

There is no truth in what you said....here is the truth.

Gun bans have different effects on different cultures.

Take guns from Japanese and the crime rate there is practically zero. Take them away in the UK and violent crime goes through the roof. Not murder no....but acts of violence yes. Switzerland, one of the most heavily armed populations on the planet....no crime. LA, also heavily armed....violent crime out the ass.

America? I think we need to be responsible but not over bearing...a solid back ground check and a little card that says you completed a safety course should be more than enough. Why? Because M'ericans like and want guns for all sorts of reasons, bottom line is they aren't going anywhere.

OK making the right wing thread....because I'm bored and have nothing better to do.
 
There is no truth in what you said....here is the truth.

Gun bans have different effects on different cultures.

Take guns from Japanese and the crime rate there is practically zero. Take them away in the UK and violent crime goes through the roof. Not murder no....but acts of violence yes. Switzerland, one of the most heavily armed populations on the planet....no crime. LA, also heavily armed....violent crime out the ass.

America? I think we need to be responsible but not over bearing...a solid back ground check and a little card that says you completed a safety course should be more than enough. Why? Because M'ericans like and want guns for all sorts of reasons, bottom line is they aren't going anywhere.

OK making the right wing thread....because I'm bored and have nothing better to do.

I figured the Japanese don't have guns because they shoot like they drive.
 
Back
Top