Impeachment Thread

[Spandex_Girl]

Funny how Trump keeps trying to stop witnesses from testifying in this investigation. Since when do innocent people try to silence witnesses?

I thought only GUILTY people tried to pressure witnesses and keep them from talking!

Trump is ALREADY frustrated that his efforts to stop people from cooperating have collapsed under the weight of legally powerful congressional subpoenas. And he's going to get even ANGRIER because now a federal judge has ruled that the impeachment inquiry is...AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY, those subpoenas come charged with a level of authority even higher than they enjoy in normal times.

 

[Leather_Lesbian]

#7 above.
Trump, as the most senior law enforcement official in the land, certainly seems to to ask a lot of favours requesting that investigating bodies and officials overlook issues.
First Comey, then Pelosi.
Not a good look at all, especially for the president.

Trump certainly seems motivated to conceal evidence and silence witnesses. You’d think that an innocent man would want the evidence out there for everyone to see. You’d think that an innocent man would WANT witnesses to talk.

 

[JackLuis]

Nancy is scheduled to appear on Colbert tomorrow night, after the Impeachment Enquiry Vote.

If she can get the Chairmen to act and the courts to respond, she could have the great unwashed educated by the impeachment hearings and the polls to show 58% voting to IMPEACH the MOTHERFUCKER by Thanksgiving!

Depending upon how scared Moscow Mitch and the Repug, Oligarchs are we could see Trumpski out by Xmas!

Many Ads will be run between now and Xmas, boom times for the LSM! Rupert is counting on a raft of Red State money in his coffers.

 

[gunthernehmen]

Nancy is scheduled to appear on Colbert tomorrow night, after the Impeachment Enquiry Vote.

If she can get the Chairmen to act and the courts to respond, she could have the great unwashed educated by the impeachment hearings and the polls to show 58% voting to IMPEACH the MOTHERFUCKER by Thanksgiving!

Depending upon how scared Moscow Mitch and the Repug, Oligarchs are we could see Trumpski out by Xmas!

Many Ads will be run between now and Xmas, boom times for the LSM! Rupert is counting on a raft of Red State money in his coffers.

Hold your breath for it

 

[domroger]

I'll certainly be glad when this whole, stupid waste of time witch hunt is over, so the president can concentrate on his second term.

If he could concentrate he would have done it by now .

 

[Dumpington]

JackLuis writes: "Depending upon how scared Moscow Mitch and the Repug, Oligarchs are we could see Trumpski out by Xmas!"

gunthernehmen writes: "Hold your breath for it"

So WHY do the Trump-haters DO this to themselves? For two-&-a-half years I remember them repeating ad-nauseum: "Wait until the Mueller Report comes out! Trumpski will be finished!" And then it came out and nothing happened.

And NOW were getting a whole NEW mantra: "Wait until the impeachment vote forces Trump from office!" Here we go again!

domroger writes: "If he could concentrate he would have done it by now"

And if the U.S. Constitution didn't exist - and the Hollywood entertainment community ran this whole impeachment witchhunt along with the mainstream media - Trump would have already been railroaded over two years ago! But that's not the case, is it?

Progressives want to believe that the Republicans in the U.S. Senate are prepared to take their marching orders from Nancy Pelosi and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez! And they believe that it may even happen by Christmas!

 

[someoneyouknow]

[Spamming, bumping multiple threads in order to flood the forum, posting same content to multiple locations, or screen-stretching to disrupt the forum is prohibited per our forum guidelines.] - Last Warning Already Given

 

[Desiremakesmeweak]

Dems should all be proud of Jerry Nadler.

And clap loudly as he approaches Niagara Falls in his barrel.

 

[bhurry]

Nancy is scheduled to appear on Colbert tomorrow night, after the Impeachment Enquiry Vote.

If she can get the Chairmen to act and the courts to respond, she could have the great unwashed educated by the impeachment hearings and the polls to show 58% voting to IMPEACH the MOTHERFUCKER by Thanksgiving!

Depending upon how scared Moscow Mitch and the Repug, Oligarchs are we could see Trumpski out by Xmas!

Many Ads will be run between now and Xmas, boom times for the LSM! Rupert is counting on a raft of Red State money in his coffers.

Make quite a pair. Lots of laughs . Pop corn anybody?

 

[bhurry]

Nancy is scheduled to appear on Colbert tomorrow night, after the Impeachment Enquiry Vote.

If she can get the Chairmen to act and the courts to respond, she could have the great unwashed educated by the impeachment hearings and the polls to show 58% voting to IMPEACH the MOTHERFUCKER by Thanksgiving!

Depending upon how scared Moscow Mitch and the Repug, Oligarchs are we could see Trumpski out by Xmas!

Many Ads will be run between now and Xmas, boom times for the LSM! Rupert is counting on a raft of Red State money in his coffers.

Depends on what polls you care to look at.

 

[gunthernehmen]

I'm shocked that nobody even cared enough to come here and post that the impeachment "Inquiry" was voted on today.

Even more impressive is they managed to get all but two democrats to vote for it, with those two and all republicans voting against it.

I wonder what will happen if they DO impeach him and it goes to the republican majority senate for trial?

 

[Boxlicker101]

I'm shocked that nobody even cared enough to come here and post that the impeachment "Inquiry" was voted on today.

Even more impressive is they managed to get all but two democrats to vote for it, with those two and all republicans voting against it.

I wonder what will happen if they DO impeach him and it goes to the republican majority senate for trial?

If it gets that far, Trump will be acquitted by the Senate. He will then win reelection, and some of the Dems will lose next Nov, giving the GOP a majority in the House.

 

[Dumpington]

Boxlicker101 writes: "If it gets that far, Trump will be acquitted by the Senate. He will then win reelection, and some of the Dems will lose next Nov, giving the GOP a majority in the House."

You're right! This whole process will end with President Trump winning vindication in the U.S. Senate. All of the Democratic Party's time & effort spent to impeach him will have been for naught!

Trump's victory will than trigger a noticeable backlash against the Democrats and their failed efforts, after which they will once again refuse to accept the workings of our U.S. Constitution, further damaging their party's 2020 presidential campaign, already hampered by their hard-shift to the left!

Joe Biden & Nancy Pelosi both know this, but they no longer control their own party. Alexandria Ocasion-Cortez & her "Squad" are the one's calling the shots, their ignorance of the process notwithstanding. When they learn that impeachment has failed, they'll go right back to what they've been doing non-stop, which is endless bitching & whining. That's NOT what the American people want to see!

 

[domroger]

I'm shocked that nobody even cared enough to come here and post that the impeachment "Inquiry" was voted on today.

Even more impressive is they managed to get all but two democrats to vote for it, with those two and all republicans voting against it.

I wonder what will happen if they DO impeach him and it goes to the republican majority senate for trial?

He'll probably win since there are reports that his reelection fund is making donations
to GOP senators .
Ah Washington ,I love the smell of corruption in the morning .

 

[gunthernehmen]

He'll probably win since there are reports that his reelection fund is making donations
to GOP senators .
Ah Washington ,I love the smell of corruption in the morning .

Can you name a president from anytime in the past say, 240+ years, that was NOT corrupt?

No?

I didn't think so.

 

[Dumpington]

domroger writes: "He'll probably win since there are reports that his reelection fund is making donations to GOP senators"

You SERIOUSLY believe that Republican Senators are currently listening to the directions being forwarded to them by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez? You SERIOUSLY believe that Adam Schiff can persuade nineteen Republican Senators to accept HIM as their new leader?

You KNOW that Trump is going to win a big victory in the U.S. Senate if the House votes to impeach, and it would appear that you're already trying to make excuses for why the Democrats are going to LOSE!

"Ah Washington, I love the smell of corruption in the morning"

Yeah, that corruption peaked during the Obama years, when Barack allowed the Russians to interfere in our election process - everybody admits it - Obama had taken an inauguration oath promising to prevent that from happening, but he clearly failed! Meanwhile, his administration was politicizing the Department of Justice, the FBI, the CIA, and even the IRS! The smell of corruption was strong indeed!

 

[YDB95]

Yeah, that corruption peaked during the Obama years, when Barack allowed the Russians to interfere in our election process - everybody admits it - Obama had taken an inauguration oath promising to prevent that from happening, but he clearly failed!

WOW.
Even for you, that is some serious projection you've got there. I'm impressed.

 

[Dumpington]

YDB95 writes: "Even for you, that is some serious projection you've got there. I'm impressed."

You're NOT stupid, YDB95!

Name a single Republican U.S. Senator (aside from RINO Mitt Romney) who just might possibly join hands with Alexandria Ocasion-Cortez, Adam Schiff, Maxine Waters, Ilhan Omar, and the rest of the House weirdo-squad in voting to remove President Trump from office!

The Trump-haters will need at least TWENTY Senate Republicans to join them in their efforts, otherwise the president WINS! And Trump doesn't have to give them so much as a nickel to remain loyal. Impeachment has no legs!

Seriously, I'd like to know WHO you believe the Democrats can persuade to join them in their efforts! Just rattle off a few last names, and we can later compare them with how they actually vote when the time comes!

 

[YDB95]

YDB95 writes: "Even for you, that is some serious projection you've got there. I'm impressed."

You're NOT stupid, YDB95!

Name a single Republican U.S. Senator (aside from RINO Mitt Romney) who just might possibly join hands with Alexandria Ocasion-Cortez, Adam Schiff, Maxine Waters, Ilhan Omar, and the rest of the House weirdo-squad in voting to remove President Trump from office!

Interesting that you namecheck three women of color and a Jewish man, out of 234 Democrats in the House. But I digress.

Since you only asked for one, Lisa Murkowski comes to mind. If the Senate were to vote on the case today, she might well be the only one (aside from Romney). But it won't be for a few months yet, most likely, and if the Republicans who are up for election next fall - and there are a lot of them, since this class was last up in the wave year of 2014 - sense that Trump is becoming a liability, anything can happen.

Do I expect twenty Republican senators to vote to remove Twitler? Well, no. But if you'd asked me two months ago if I expected the House to impeach him, my answer then would have been no. We'll see.

 

[Dumpington]

YDB95 writes: "Interesting that you namecheck three women of color and a Jewish man, out of 234 Democrats in the House. But I digress."

You're funny, YDB95! I picked the three most ANTI-AMERICAN House members that I could think of - and you're now telling me that they're ALL Democrats? Geez... what are the odds? It's like there's nobody NORMAL remaining in that party!

"Since you only asked for one, Lisa Murkowski comes to mind. If the Senate were to vote on the case today, she might well be the only one (aside from Romney)."

Okay... if that comes true, that's STILL about eighteen senate votes short of removing Trump from office, assuming that all of the Democrats vote against Trump, which probably won't happen. Joe Manchin, for example, was a Democratic U.S. Senator who actually voted to approve Judge Brett Kavanaugh!

I noticed that in the House of Representatives vote, EVERY single G.O.P. member supported the president - every single one - but NOT every Democrat House member supported impeachment! Representatives Collin Peterson of Minnesota’s Seventh Congressional District and Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey’s Second District both said "NO to Pelosi, Schiff, Omar, & Ocasio-Cortez! Was it because they're both racists? You tell me!

“If anyone thinks a partisan impeachment process would constrain President Trump, they are fooling themselves,” Peterson said in a statement. “Without significant bipartisan support, impeachment proceedings will be a lengthy and divisive action with no resolution.” After the vote he issued a statement in which he said that moving forward was a mistake without the support of Senate Republicans.

“All that’s swirling around us now is impeachment,” said Van Drew in a Fox News interview last month, adding: “There is nothing that’s turned up that truly is impeachable.” Again, this is from a House DEMOCRAT!

"Do I expect twenty Republican senators to vote to remove Twitler? Well, no. But if you'd asked me two months ago if I expected the House to impeach him, my answer then would have been no. We'll see."

My sentiments exactly. The House will vote to impeach the president, with the U.S. Senate then slapping them down and handing President Trump a solid VINDICATION on the eve of his 2020 re-election! And I doubt that even Romney & Murkowski will vote with the Democrats in the end (and it won't be because they're both racists, either!)

 

[Boxlicker101]

Can you name a president from anytime in the past say, 240+ years, that was NOT corrupt?

No?

I didn't think so.

Probably George Washington, but that would be the only one.

 

[YDB95]

YDB95 writes: "Interesting that you namecheck three women of color and a Jewish man, out of 234 Democrats in the House. But I digress."

You're funny, YDB95! I picked the three most ANTI-AMERICAN House members that I could think of - and you're now telling me that they're ALL Democrats? Geez... what are the odds? It's like there's nobody NORMAL remaining in that party!

Anti-Trump does NOT mean anti-American.

I noticed that in the House of Representatives vote, EVERY single G.O.P. member supported the president - every single one - but NOT every Democrat House member supported impeachment! Representatives Collin Peterson of Minnesota’s Seventh Congressional District and Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey’s Second District both said "NO to Pelosi, Schiff, Omar, & Ocasio-Cortez! Was it because they're both racists? You tell me!

In Peterson's case, it's because he represents the reddest district of any House Democrat. I have no idea why Van Drew, who represents a purple district, did it. But that is only two out of 234 - so what? (And Justin Amash did vote to impeach - although he's left the House Republican caucus, he was always elected as a Republican.)

“If anyone thinks a partisan impeachment process would constrain President Trump, they are fooling themselves,” Peterson said in a statement.

That much is true. But it's no excuse to condone what Trump did.

 

[gunthernehmen]

Probably George Washington, but that would be the only one.

You mean the slave owner that lied about chopping down his father's prized cherry tree?

 

[gunthernehmen]

The impeachment attempt is nothing but a smoke screen.

It isn't meant to succeed. Just keep the rabble agitated so they vote next year.

 

[YDB95]

You mean the slave owner that lied about chopping down his father's prized cherry tree?

He was a slave owner, but the cherry tree story is probably apocryphal.

The impressment attempt is nothing but a smoke screen.

It isn't meant to succeed. Just keep the rabble agitated so they vote next year.

Believe me, the left does NOT need any help being encouraged to get out and vote next year.