Kuntmode
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2002
- Posts
- 1,249
Figure out how so many on this board cannot seem to see what is exactly the case in the war that we have been witnessing.
Prior to the invasion, Iraq had to disarm or face the consequences with or without UN backing according to US officials.
The US was sick of waiting, so along with Britian and Australia they promptly set about on their merry way of invading the country to disarm them by force. The main focus was to prove that Iraq had been in defiance of previous resolutions set down by the UN Security Council to abide by. Disarming their weapons of mass destruction. The US talked tough along with Britian and said they had clear cut evidence that they possessed these weapons and were hiding them. It now appears that a lot of what Iraq stated seems to kind of have some weight behind it. Each time the US or Britian was asked to provide this evidence something went amiss. The evidence they did propose was disproved, and ironically fabricated.
Where the fuck are these weapons?
They have not been used, and each time the US has come out and said they have found something, it has been more on the side of being merely heresay or over exaggerated. The way the whole process at the UN came about, it seemed pretty well an open and cut case in that Iraq had an abundance of these weapons, and in that, they were observed by the US as a threat to their national security. The majority of other nations around the world did not see this as being the case, and the most powerful nation on earth seemed to be the only one really paranoid or worried about Iraq launching such a strike or threat towards them. They may indeed have these weapons, but it seems to be more on the side of just a handful, rather than what it would appear Blair and Bush rallied on about.
Once the US had stated it was going to invade Iraq and the deadline was up, the world was divided and Bush ran off speech after speech about why this invasion must happen. The intial objectives of why they were going in soon faded, and the talk changed dramatically to toppling a regime, much like how the talk changed as to do with Afghanistan, and before we knew it, the US was invading a country to remove a government in power that does not adhere to the financial interests of the US and other western nations. In other words, Iraq is potentially a very rich nation that would serve US interests much better if it were under the control of the US government or at least under their thumb.
Bush continually went about talking about how brutal and evil the Iraqi regime is and that the people of Iraq needed to be free from his dictatorship. They were oppressed and suffering.
Before the invasion took place, they had decided on a new alternative government, contracts had been set up to be controlled by US companies and basically the main objectives were to get in there and shore up all the oilfields to benefit, in Bush's mind the Iraqi people.
So what has happened since they set foot on Iraqi soil?
They have fueled more hatred among the Muslim world, and neighbouring Arab countries will be more inclined to purchase weapons of mass destruction to protect 'their' own national security.
Europe is bitterly divided on what has taken place, and the wounds between the US and it's other allies remain at their worst, maybe to never be healed.
The UN is looked upon as useless in America's eyes, yet once it became apparent that there was going to be a vast humanitarian problem in Iraq, the US, under the influence of Britian has shifted back into the stance of saying the UN has a role to play in Iraq.
But what about the rest of the world?
The situation in Zimbabwe has been overlooked, as Mugabe freely walks around oppressing his people.
Congo is experiencing massacres daily to the ignorance of the world, especially the US.
Other African nations operate on similiar lines.
North Korea continues on it's path of defiance and is building more missles capable of launching weapons of mass destruction on any given day.
Pakistan continues along the same path, much to the anger of India who seem to keep suggesting that they are by far and bigger threat in the region that Iraq ever was.
Armed conflicts flurry everywhere and their are the makings of potential humanitarian crisis in the future, yet these places don't figure on the plans of the White House. Ask yourself why?
But finally, take a look at Iraq. It is in total chaos, and the people that the US wanted to free, are now freely walking around, smashing shop windows and offices, looting and fighting among themselves. Anarchy and chaos has gripped every town that the Coalition forces have gone in and pushed the Baath party and armed forces out of. All they can do is sit back and fire off a few warning shots in the hope that these people stop what they are doing. Within these areas, there are older men sitting down and forming their own political parties. They are under the belief that they will have the right to run for office like in any other democratic society, and that the US and Britian will not stay in their country. That they will be able to sort out a new era for themselves, and control their own oil and wealth.
Bush has tried to portray the Iraqi people as a warm and loving society under a brutal dictatorship. That dictatorship is no different to any other form of government around the world, it is just within countries like Iraq, their laws differ somewhat to the western world, but at the end of the day, the people within any country must abide by the laws.
The stories that are coming out of Iraq are used to paint the picture of presenting the US led invasion as being right.
Maybe the US needs to look at their own ways of dealing with chaos within their nation. Vigilance within any nation is crushed. The world looked on in horror at how the Chinese dealt with the situation in Tianamen Square. The dili massacre in East Timor? How about Rwanda and Somailia? Let's look to South America and various coup attempts crushed by the respective governments within these nations.
But let's not forget the LA riots or the Waco disaster. Much like many other anti-establishment rallys or protests. How about various cult or people that want to form their own little independant states or towns? I have seen quite a lot of footage of police or goverment institutions within the US and Britian brutally clubbing people in the streets or in fact drawing out their guns and shooting unarmed citizens. Of course these are just accidents and always covered up somehow.
Make no mistake, Saddam Hussein is indeed a man that has run a regime of terror and oppressed the people there, but before we point fingers, maybe have a look at the type of people that live under his system. Maybe look into the laws of Iraq and other Arab nations and try to understand things a little better before comparison's can be made as to how they should live. The death penalty still exists within the US, and even if they don't kill criminals, more than likely you get a sentance of 100years for crimes that elsewhere would get you 10 - 20. Cuba is a prime example of how the US seems to deal with people they feel are criminals or terrorists. Their interogation techniques are no different than the methods used by those they are now in the process of removing from power.
Saddam is not innocent and is most definitely in the same league as Ida Amin, Pol Pot, Pinochet and others in their hey day. But name a Middle eastern country in the last 50 years that has not been ruled in the same vein as how he has operated since he came to power. Let's not forget he has been aided in his oppression by those who went to overthrow him.
The US has created an unstable future for Iraq and the whole region. It has stuck it's nose where it is not wanted once again, and I am sure soon enough, the American people will be gripped by some sort of terrorist action.
This time, it maybe wise for the American public to do what they should have done before as in the 9/11 disaster. Hold your fucking government accountable. Riot like the black community did in LA, and show the world that you don't wish to stand behind future governments that are good at getting you to support their ideals or what they feel is right, yet 9 times out 10, when they try to put into practice what they preech, they fail miserably.
Whilst you all work hard over the coming months, and pay your taxes and struggle to raise your families from the restrictions your governments system places upon you, have a look at all the grins on the faces of people like Bush, Cheney, Powell, Rumsfeld and the whole entrourage of cunts that went off to war, lied consistently to their own people, yet are now toasting one another in the halls of the White House, patting each other on the back, and will soon hide in their little forcefields,protected from future terrorist attacks whilst counting all the money they are set to make in the future from the new Iraqi government that dangles to the tune of Yankee Doodle Dandy.
You lot have to go to Walmart, Disneyland, McDonalds and other outlets praying a car bomb doesn't go off, or the plane you are on isn't hijacked or that underground subway does come under a chemical attack.
Saddam is alive and well.
So is Osama.
Your government would like you to believe they are dead.
Their power base maybe be gone, but they are still alive and like your politicians, they are sitting back living off the millions they make out of other people's suffering.
Good luck citizens of America. And may God bless the cunt that walks up and put's a bullet between the eyes of George W Bush.
Prior to the invasion, Iraq had to disarm or face the consequences with or without UN backing according to US officials.
The US was sick of waiting, so along with Britian and Australia they promptly set about on their merry way of invading the country to disarm them by force. The main focus was to prove that Iraq had been in defiance of previous resolutions set down by the UN Security Council to abide by. Disarming their weapons of mass destruction. The US talked tough along with Britian and said they had clear cut evidence that they possessed these weapons and were hiding them. It now appears that a lot of what Iraq stated seems to kind of have some weight behind it. Each time the US or Britian was asked to provide this evidence something went amiss. The evidence they did propose was disproved, and ironically fabricated.
Where the fuck are these weapons?
They have not been used, and each time the US has come out and said they have found something, it has been more on the side of being merely heresay or over exaggerated. The way the whole process at the UN came about, it seemed pretty well an open and cut case in that Iraq had an abundance of these weapons, and in that, they were observed by the US as a threat to their national security. The majority of other nations around the world did not see this as being the case, and the most powerful nation on earth seemed to be the only one really paranoid or worried about Iraq launching such a strike or threat towards them. They may indeed have these weapons, but it seems to be more on the side of just a handful, rather than what it would appear Blair and Bush rallied on about.
Once the US had stated it was going to invade Iraq and the deadline was up, the world was divided and Bush ran off speech after speech about why this invasion must happen. The intial objectives of why they were going in soon faded, and the talk changed dramatically to toppling a regime, much like how the talk changed as to do with Afghanistan, and before we knew it, the US was invading a country to remove a government in power that does not adhere to the financial interests of the US and other western nations. In other words, Iraq is potentially a very rich nation that would serve US interests much better if it were under the control of the US government or at least under their thumb.
Bush continually went about talking about how brutal and evil the Iraqi regime is and that the people of Iraq needed to be free from his dictatorship. They were oppressed and suffering.
Before the invasion took place, they had decided on a new alternative government, contracts had been set up to be controlled by US companies and basically the main objectives were to get in there and shore up all the oilfields to benefit, in Bush's mind the Iraqi people.
So what has happened since they set foot on Iraqi soil?
They have fueled more hatred among the Muslim world, and neighbouring Arab countries will be more inclined to purchase weapons of mass destruction to protect 'their' own national security.
Europe is bitterly divided on what has taken place, and the wounds between the US and it's other allies remain at their worst, maybe to never be healed.
The UN is looked upon as useless in America's eyes, yet once it became apparent that there was going to be a vast humanitarian problem in Iraq, the US, under the influence of Britian has shifted back into the stance of saying the UN has a role to play in Iraq.
But what about the rest of the world?
The situation in Zimbabwe has been overlooked, as Mugabe freely walks around oppressing his people.
Congo is experiencing massacres daily to the ignorance of the world, especially the US.
Other African nations operate on similiar lines.
North Korea continues on it's path of defiance and is building more missles capable of launching weapons of mass destruction on any given day.
Pakistan continues along the same path, much to the anger of India who seem to keep suggesting that they are by far and bigger threat in the region that Iraq ever was.
Armed conflicts flurry everywhere and their are the makings of potential humanitarian crisis in the future, yet these places don't figure on the plans of the White House. Ask yourself why?
But finally, take a look at Iraq. It is in total chaos, and the people that the US wanted to free, are now freely walking around, smashing shop windows and offices, looting and fighting among themselves. Anarchy and chaos has gripped every town that the Coalition forces have gone in and pushed the Baath party and armed forces out of. All they can do is sit back and fire off a few warning shots in the hope that these people stop what they are doing. Within these areas, there are older men sitting down and forming their own political parties. They are under the belief that they will have the right to run for office like in any other democratic society, and that the US and Britian will not stay in their country. That they will be able to sort out a new era for themselves, and control their own oil and wealth.
Bush has tried to portray the Iraqi people as a warm and loving society under a brutal dictatorship. That dictatorship is no different to any other form of government around the world, it is just within countries like Iraq, their laws differ somewhat to the western world, but at the end of the day, the people within any country must abide by the laws.
The stories that are coming out of Iraq are used to paint the picture of presenting the US led invasion as being right.
Maybe the US needs to look at their own ways of dealing with chaos within their nation. Vigilance within any nation is crushed. The world looked on in horror at how the Chinese dealt with the situation in Tianamen Square. The dili massacre in East Timor? How about Rwanda and Somailia? Let's look to South America and various coup attempts crushed by the respective governments within these nations.
But let's not forget the LA riots or the Waco disaster. Much like many other anti-establishment rallys or protests. How about various cult or people that want to form their own little independant states or towns? I have seen quite a lot of footage of police or goverment institutions within the US and Britian brutally clubbing people in the streets or in fact drawing out their guns and shooting unarmed citizens. Of course these are just accidents and always covered up somehow.
Make no mistake, Saddam Hussein is indeed a man that has run a regime of terror and oppressed the people there, but before we point fingers, maybe have a look at the type of people that live under his system. Maybe look into the laws of Iraq and other Arab nations and try to understand things a little better before comparison's can be made as to how they should live. The death penalty still exists within the US, and even if they don't kill criminals, more than likely you get a sentance of 100years for crimes that elsewhere would get you 10 - 20. Cuba is a prime example of how the US seems to deal with people they feel are criminals or terrorists. Their interogation techniques are no different than the methods used by those they are now in the process of removing from power.
Saddam is not innocent and is most definitely in the same league as Ida Amin, Pol Pot, Pinochet and others in their hey day. But name a Middle eastern country in the last 50 years that has not been ruled in the same vein as how he has operated since he came to power. Let's not forget he has been aided in his oppression by those who went to overthrow him.
The US has created an unstable future for Iraq and the whole region. It has stuck it's nose where it is not wanted once again, and I am sure soon enough, the American people will be gripped by some sort of terrorist action.
This time, it maybe wise for the American public to do what they should have done before as in the 9/11 disaster. Hold your fucking government accountable. Riot like the black community did in LA, and show the world that you don't wish to stand behind future governments that are good at getting you to support their ideals or what they feel is right, yet 9 times out 10, when they try to put into practice what they preech, they fail miserably.
Whilst you all work hard over the coming months, and pay your taxes and struggle to raise your families from the restrictions your governments system places upon you, have a look at all the grins on the faces of people like Bush, Cheney, Powell, Rumsfeld and the whole entrourage of cunts that went off to war, lied consistently to their own people, yet are now toasting one another in the halls of the White House, patting each other on the back, and will soon hide in their little forcefields,protected from future terrorist attacks whilst counting all the money they are set to make in the future from the new Iraqi government that dangles to the tune of Yankee Doodle Dandy.
You lot have to go to Walmart, Disneyland, McDonalds and other outlets praying a car bomb doesn't go off, or the plane you are on isn't hijacked or that underground subway does come under a chemical attack.
Saddam is alive and well.
So is Osama.
Your government would like you to believe they are dead.
Their power base maybe be gone, but they are still alive and like your politicians, they are sitting back living off the millions they make out of other people's suffering.
Good luck citizens of America. And may God bless the cunt that walks up and put's a bullet between the eyes of George W Bush.
