Hunter is trying to avoid the gun charge by claiming that the diversion plea deal is still in place

[HisArpy]

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/rebec...to-make-moves-on-delaware-gun-charge-n2632276

Apparently Hunter's lawyer is insisting that the diversion part of the plea agreement is still in effect.

Personally I think his lawyer is scrambling and trying to figure out a way to avoid looking like a loser because there's a problem with this entire line of reasoning.

From the article:

The Indictment against Mr. Biden must be dismissed because it violates a Diversion Agreement that is in effect between Mr. Biden and the prosecution," Lowell argued in the filing. "In exchange for Mr. Biden giving up various rights—including his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent..."

The problem here is that Hunter was just indicted again for the tax fraud stuff. Some people believe that this indictment was done so that he could assert his 5th Amendment rights at his upcoming deposition to avoid answering questions about his dad getting paid off.

But...

If the plea deal is still in effect as his lawyer claims, then he WAIVED that right.

Oops.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

But the courts are corrupt.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Damn, now he'll never be President!

 

[DeluxAuto]

But the courts are corrupt.

Don't forget the Soros-funded DAs and judges!

 

[Fuzzy1975]

If the plea deal is still in effect as his lawyer claims, then he WAIVED that right.

Oops.

So his Lawyers argument is correct and should prevail. Because if the deal is not in place, he can plead the 5th in the upcoming trials. Fuck Arpy, agreeing with the Defence of Hunter....I'm shocked, shocked I say!